Royal Gossip
April 22, 2019, 05:57:18 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 50th anniversary of the Prince of Wales's investiture March 5  (Read 935 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cali San D
Baroness
***
Online Online

Posts: 760



« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2019, 02:55:08 am »

I have watched the video a dozen times and I still can't get over how the Sussex duo weren't allowed to briefly glance at the table items like every one else.  easter-lol

If it was timing then maybe they should have gone in and taken a seat and waited for the "heirs" to show up like the Earl of Snowdon who sat next to Meg.  tehe

Just awkward.  dontknow
Logged
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4622


« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2019, 04:43:23 am »

Charles is seen waving the Sussexes into the room with William and Catherine but there seemed to be some confusion. The aides were trying to get all the royals into the main reception room for the music recital to start. I hardly think that Charles, knowing that cameras were on them, would have deliberately caused a huge public snub to the younger son he is said to be extremely close to, or to his wife.
 
Charles had moved up to escort the Queen in the absence of the DOE, that left Camilla alone, so William moved up..it ended up a bit of a schmozzle. Harry was sitting next to his father and stepmother, Meghan, his wife, was seated next to him. Next to her was Lord Snowdon, who was there of course representing his dead father who organised the 1969 ceremony. He was, along with Charles, a sort of guest of honour, due to his father's work.
Logged
Miss Hathaway
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2505



« Reply #22 on: March 06, 2019, 05:17:42 am »

Charles was not waving the Sussexes into the room.  It was he and the queen...then Camilla...then the Cambridges.  The Sussexes were guided away from the display by the aides.
Logged
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4622


« Reply #23 on: March 06, 2019, 05:34:37 am »

So Charles wished to give a very public snub to his favourite son and his wife in front of cameras? Don't think so. That's not the way the BRF operates. They do things privately. And if a snub had been intended then the Sussexes wouldn't have been invited at all. That would have been simple. Instead the couple were seated next to Charles and Camilla in the main reception room, which the aides were clearly trying to get the royals into as quickly as possible. The Cambridges had about ten seconds at that table before they were all out, so it was obviously a timing/scheduling thing.

A private moment at thevreception between Kate and Meghan.

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/hidden-moment-between-meghan-and-kate-reveals-truth-about-royal-feud/news-story/6af251545daacfd054d708480f36f967
Logged
Miss Hathaway
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2505



« Reply #24 on: March 06, 2019, 06:58:54 am »

Yes, exactly.  The entire Royal Family snubbed Meggles and Harry.  That was quite clear. 
Logged
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010



« Reply #25 on: March 06, 2019, 11:29:08 am »

They are no longer wanted at the grownups table. Adding to that that imo Harry is not Charle's bio son, I think that it's high time he and his wife are put in their places.

Not inviting them is not the British way of revenge. With finesse. Best to invite them but ignore them. That should speak volumes to Harry who is born and raised in UK. Megs probably will not even get what's happening and how She is responsible for all this with Her actions.
Logged

sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11181


« Reply #26 on: March 06, 2019, 04:31:48 pm »

Harry IS Charles' biological Son. No way would Charles have allowed Harry into the line of succession if he was not his bio kid. Diana and Hewitt began an affair when Harry was 2. And Charles And Diana conceived Harry in December 1983 when both were with the royals at Christmas.  Diana would not have gotten that huge divorce settlement if she presented someone else's kid as Charles' It just does not add up. And Harry has the Spencer red hair.

In looking at photos Harry is strikingly like Charles and his Grandfather Prince Philip. As a toddler he looked more like Charles than William did.

Diana and Harry would have been exiled if Harry were Hewitt's. Charles did not even want Andrew to be next in  line no way in hell would have Charles put someone else's son in the line of succession. I think this is a very cruel rumor and so not true.

Why would Charles put his own son in his place and his daughter in law?

They certainly were not ignored at the event. There is no reason for them to be ignored or snubbed.

I saw no snub at the event.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2019, 04:34:14 pm by sandy » Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3127



« Reply #27 on: March 06, 2019, 06:09:05 pm »

It's quite clear for the video that Charles tld harry and meghan to "stand there" when he walked into the room with ER etc, How did Harry and Meghan get ahead of the rest of them when they would have been following behind. Meghan sys something to Charles and attempt to follow i before this comment then the aides rush in and sterr harry and meghan away from the display. Harry's face was thunderous.He is soon going to have to choose as the RF won;t put up with that little upstart causing any more embarrassment. chaos and disrespect, As soon as they realise how  she is dragging them into the gutter they will act to preserve the monarchy.

As for Harry being Charles's son or not, I do not know,  but he has allowed others into the line of succession (MO thead) who are not true heirs so why not Harry.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11181


« Reply #28 on: March 06, 2019, 06:29:18 pm »

I don't see this as a big deal, I think too much is read into it. And for one reason or another there is a wish to have Harry and Meghan "humiliated." He already got married to Meghan he is not going to dump her now. I did not see any thunderous face.

No way in hell would Charles have let someone else's kid in line of succession. Harry looks like Charles. And it would have been a miracle if Hewitt had sired Harry since Hewitt and Diana only started their affair in 1986.

Harry is not going to have to choose anything. He married Meghan and they are royals.

The chaos IMO is only projected.

It already was dragged down into gutter level in 2005. I'll say no more.

All the people in the line of succession are royals or are of royal blood--and Charles does not "allow" people in. The Line of Succession has been in existence since time immemorial and only the Queen has the power to "control it". Illegitimate people are not allowed in.

Harry is Charles son. Period. By blood.
Logged
buflesse
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3620



« Reply #29 on: March 06, 2019, 07:04:56 pm »


If you actually watch the video, Kate doesn't smile at Meghan. The DM ran an article about it, with the video, and all the top comments were pointing out the same thing, that Kate was smiling at the man who spoke to her, and Meghan tried to join in. Kate wasn't looking at Meghan.
Logged
CathyJane
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5370


« Reply #30 on: March 06, 2019, 07:33:08 pm »

Yes, exactly.  The entire Royal Family snubbed Meggles and Harry.  That was quite clear. 


That's my opinion also. Chuck quite clearly said "You stand there" to Harry and MEggles.

I firmly believe Harry is Chuck's son. He is looking more and more like Philip as he ages.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11181


« Reply #31 on: March 06, 2019, 08:12:24 pm »

Harry is like Philip in that both made politically incorrect statements in their lifetimes.
Logged
meememe
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2661



« Reply #32 on: March 06, 2019, 08:34:24 pm »


All the people in the line of succession are royals or are of royal blood--and Charles does not "allow" people in. The Line of Succession has been in existence since time immemorial and only the Queen has the power to "control it". Illegitimate people are not allowed in.

Harry is Charles son. Period. By blood.

I agree that Harry is Charles' son. He was the spitting image of Philip's father when he was a child and has the same thin face features of that Prince Andrew (not the current one).

A correction if I may - the Queen doesn't control the line of succession. Parliament does and has done so since the Act of Settlement in 1701, when the line was formally legislated. That is why it took so long to get the Succession to the Crown Act passed - as it wasn't only the British parliament that had to pass the legislation but the governments of many of the other realms. In Australia it meant the states passing the legislation first and then including a formal request - once all the states had passed it - for the Federal government to pass it.

Illegitimate children would be in if no one knew they were illegitimate and in the UK a child is legitimate IF the father acknowledges paternity and the parents are married at the time of the birth of the child. That is why it is treason for the wife of the king or the wife of the heir apparent to ever sleep with anyone other than their husband - to ensure that all children that close to the throne are legitimate.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11181


« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2019, 08:49:46 pm »

Charles would never acknowledge someone else's child. Harry was very much planned by Charles and Diana.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!