Royal Gossip
April 22, 2019, 05:54:43 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 ... 46   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Duke and Duchess of Sussex: Press Articles & Random Chat 2019  (Read 43326 times)
sanka and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15369



« Reply #600 on: March 17, 2019, 03:23:00 pm »

^I hope that’s true (second article).  How many times must it be said that the BRF is apolitical?
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010



« Reply #601 on: March 17, 2019, 04:05:10 pm »

^^ You know the article is written by Markle and her team when there are claims that she'll transform the rf, break the internet etc etc and her name is before her husbands ... kind of disrespectful but if he doesn't get rid of her - delivery of baby or not, he's going to sink with her.

^ Every time Meggy tries to blurt something political there will be such an article. I believe she'll try to use every opportunity now that the Queen is vetoing her getting separate from BP and doing her own thing at taxpayer expense.
Logged

windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #602 on: March 17, 2019, 04:19:09 pm »

This is so stupid the fact that we're to belive that Harry is with this crzy grifter of his own accord; that he didn't see what a cold hearted narc she is. The sppoks, MI5/6 has to be involved in all of this because it's not only Harry reputation that's being affected, but the whole royal family. What's the point of having them surrounded by heavy security if someone like Meghan can be easily picked up at Soho House after using her services?  huh dontknow
Now she's still running around placing crzy pr pieces in the press as if she has power to defy the ryals and do her own thing like throwing a 2nd babt shower for herself and other such nonsense. She wants to show that she can't be told what to do by anyone. How's this making any sense?

However to try and stop Kate's woodland space from being eclipsed by the vibrant African design, Camfed were reportedly asked not to use a picture of Harry surrounded by Zimbabwean girls to promote its garden, reports the Sunday Times.
A source from the charity told the paper: 'It's because the Duchess of Cambridge is co-designing a garden... The palace is worried about mixed messaging.'
However Kensington Palace have denied this, saying the decision about the picture was made by administrators as the Duke of Sussex had 'no official interaction with designing the Chelsea garden', although he is 'incredibly supportive' of the charity.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6818767/Kate-Middletons-Chelsea-Flower-design-against-Meghan-Markles.html

So technically, Meghan has nothing to do with the design of the garden and is only a suporter of the charaty.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2019, 04:23:01 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010



« Reply #603 on: March 17, 2019, 04:37:00 pm »

Nope, she just wants to steal the spotlight from Kate, not being super jelly and all that. Looking at the DM comments - epic fail for Megan's PR, again.
Logged

windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #604 on: March 17, 2019, 05:01:52 pm »

Petition to stop funding their lifestyle.
Stop UK funding for Meghan Markle & Prince Harry's lifestyle
Since the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle we, the people have been shocked by the exorbitant spending of this married couple. It is said that Meghan Markle (now the Duchess of Sussex) has spent well over one million pounds (£1000000.00) on just clothes in just under one year. Britain is facing Brexit and economic hardship. Many thousands are homeless and children are going to school with no breakfast, times are undoubtedly hard for working class Brits. Yet, the taxes that we pay, is going towards an American ( not even British)  woman's wardrobe allowance, also this allowance is not supporting British designers,  but mega expensive designers in America, Canada, or Europe. She has shown little or no understanding of British culture, traditions or history.
Since writing this petition, It has been suggested that Meghan Markle should NOT be allowed to use the name "Duchess", at the very least until she becomes a British Citizen. Currently she is neither a British subject not a member of the Commonwealth. Therefore it could be argued that she has no right to the title of "Duchess"
https://www.change.org/p/uk-parliament-stop-uk-funding-for-meghan-markle-prince-harry-s-lifestyle?recruiter=938120088&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4621


« Reply #605 on: March 17, 2019, 08:33:53 pm »

That petition, just a long rant, wouldn't be considered by Parliament, even if it got there. And it won't. Who's going to sign it, a lot of Americans and non British citizens like last time?

The styling of Duchess comes from Meghan marrying Harry, a Duke. It's not a separate title. All wives in the UK take on their husband's styling/title. And Charles largely funds their lifestyle from Duchy money, (as he does the Cambridges,) aside from Harry's inheritance from Diana,) not Parliament. So Princess Michael shouldn't have been a Princess, taking her husband's styling, as she wasn't British? Birgette, the Duchess of Gloucester, was Danish, shouldn't have been a Duchess, then? Not to mention all the other foreigners who for centuries married into the BRF!

This is a ridiculous petition, written up by someone who apparently doesn't understand British law, British custom, or the way the BRF operates.
Logged
lesken
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #606 on: March 17, 2019, 09:24:52 pm »

^The petition is he least of this con girl's problems.
Logged

The only constant is change.
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #607 on: March 17, 2019, 09:33:51 pm »

Prince Harry 'plans to take two weeks of paternity leave' after the birth of his baby because 'he thinks it's a very modern dad thing to do'
The royal is expected to take a break from official engagements in order to help his wife look after their baby because 'it's a very modern Dad thing to do'.

Meghan could give birth as soon as next week if she has her baby prematurely and medics are watching the 37-year-old closely.  eating cookies

But as soon as the baby is born Harry is expected to take time away to fully support his wife.  bored3

Harry's last paid job was as a captain in the army for ten years with his commission ending in 2015.

Now the royal's duties are co-funded by the Queen and the Prince of Wales.

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: 'I'm sure Her Majesty will accommodate a break from duties.'

Until the royal couple's baby is born medics will regularly test the Duchess of Sussex for high-blood pressure and protein in urine to check for any conditions.  Cool

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6819415/Prince-Harry-plans-two-weeks-paternity-leave-birth-baby.html
Umm, so she’s not assigned proper doctors as this is a high risk pregnancy because of her age but random medics.  tehe
Comments:
TDLeeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 7 minutes ago
How will we cope without him "at work"? Someone should tell him he hasn't worked for ten years since being booted out of the army for unbecoming conduct.

Dolly Parton, Nashville, United States, moments ago
I can't stand this dude now.

WildCherrymoonshine, Suffolk, United Kingdom, moments ago
Oh dear couldn't make this stuff up. Two weeks off what?

Royal rift: Princes William and Harry HAVE fallen out says expert - ‘It’s becoming PUBLIC'
PRINCES William and Harry have fallen out, rather than their wives as had been widely reported, according to a Royal expert and documentary maker.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1101205/Meghan-Markle-Kate-Middleton-Prince-Harry-Prince-William-Royal-news-The-Queen
Pleeze  bored3
« Last Edit: March 17, 2019, 09:41:11 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #608 on: March 17, 2019, 10:29:14 pm »

 flower

A royal christening! Meghan joins new godfather Harry and the Queen at church service for Zara Tindall's ten-month-old daughter Lena - just weeks before they are due to become first-time parents
    EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry has been made a godfather to ten-month-old Lena weeks before his first baby is due
    Meghan covered her bump with a buttoned-up burgundy coat in a low-key ceremony in Gloucestershire
    The Queen and Princess Anne were in attendance but Prince Philip, William and Kate did not show
Prince Harry is not due to become a father until next month – but yesterday his cousin Zara Tindall showed her faith in his parenting abilities.

She made him godfather to her baby Lena at her christening at St Nicholas Church in Cherington, Gloucestershire.

The event was also attended by the Queen, whose presence will have surprised some royal-watchers because she did not attend the christening of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s third child, Prince Louis.



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6820105/Prince-Harry-godfather-cousin-Zara-Tindalls-little-Lena.html
« Last Edit: March 17, 2019, 10:32:30 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15369



« Reply #609 on: March 17, 2019, 10:31:15 pm »

^^Have to add an Amen to the last comment.  “Leave” means you actually work (or open your own car door, take the bus, live on a tight budget, cook for yourself, etc), so, thanks for pretending to be ‘just like us’ in text only.  Again.  
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #610 on: March 18, 2019, 03:18:50 am »

Charles started his Caribbean tour. He’s going to the countries that I believe wanted to boot the queen from being head of state.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6820347/Hair-throne-Charles-begins-12-day-tour-Caribbean-bit-do.html

Usually when the queen gets involved, it signals the end.  eating cookies

Her eye brows aren’t done, but looks like she trawled on the bronzer as her hands are whiter than her hands.
https://66.media.tumblr.com/900ebe42f4ac00ca628b9504a6c26ca2/tumblr_inline_poji20mhsJ1vh0s4w_1280.png
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
dianab
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2422


« Reply #611 on: March 18, 2019, 02:43:52 pm »

Queen vetoes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s philanthropy plans
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle are itching to set up a global “philanthropy brand” without the pesky oversight of the royal family — but the Queen and Prince Charles have put the kibosh on their plans.

Instead, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will set up an official household of aides and staffers within Buckingham Palace, under the Queen’s watchful eye.

“They wanted their household to be entirely independent of Buckingham Palace, but were told ‘no’,” a royal source told the Sunday Times of London. “They can’t just go off and do their own thing.”
meghan attitude is written all over that
Logged
SouthernBelle
gossip insider
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


« Reply #612 on: March 21, 2019, 12:18:08 am »


Her eye brows aren’t done, but looks like she trawled on the bronzer as her hands are whiter than her hands.
https://66.media.tumblr.com/900ebe42f4ac00ca628b9504a6c26ca2/tumblr_inline_poji20mhsJ1vh0s4w_1280.png

[/quote]

Terrible complexion — greasy, uneven pigment, and blemishes.  With all that money, one would think she’s have perfect skin. 
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #613 on: March 23, 2019, 01:52:34 am »

EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: Queen brings back one of her most loyal lieutenants to 'keep an eye' on ambitious Meghan and Harry
I hear she has quietly appointed Sir Christopher Geidt as her Permanent Lord in Waiting. He resigned as her private secretary after an alleged palace coup two years ago.  eating cookies

‘Her Majesty values Lord Geidt’s wise counsel,’ a courtier tells me. ‘This new role gives him a formal status again.’

It’s a non-political appointment and was made at the Queen’s personal discretion. Geidt will be involved in ceremonial events and greet heads of state, such as President Trump, when they visit Buckingham Palace.

Importantly, Sir Christopher will be working closely with the Duchess of Sussex at the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, of which he is chairman. The Queen made Meghan vice-president of the organisation, which she holds dear, earlier this month.

‘This was all part of the plan to introduce the Duchess to royal life,’ explains the courtier. ‘Lord Geidt will be Her Majesty’s eyes and ears.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6841115/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL-Queen-brings-loyal-lieutenant-eye-Meghan-Harry.html

The big guns are coming out to support the queen and somewhat slag off Meghan. Dickie Arbiter and now the queen bringing back Lord Geidt in this high rank capability.
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4621


« Reply #614 on: March 23, 2019, 02:07:08 am »

A Permanent Lord in Waiting is a ceremonial court role sometimes given to those who have given long service to the Crown. This appointment is more likely to be a soothing gesture to Lord Geidt than anything else. The Queen probably did not want the then Sir Christopher Geidt to leave as her Private Secretary last year but clashes with CH staff made it inevitable as Charles is taken over the helm more and more. So there was a big shakeup of senior staff at BP.

Geidt is hardly likely to be doing any spying on Meghan. She'll be on maternity leave for at least four months after the birth of baby Sussex, the Queen's Commonwealth Trust is only one of Meghan's causes and when she does do engagements with them later Lord Geidt will probably not be there on all occasions.

Not to mention that Eden Confidential and the Fail are about as credible as a two bob watch!
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #615 on: March 23, 2019, 03:06:22 am »

Will they get the Markle sparkle? Meghan's stylist best friend Jessica Mulroney surprises a couple with their dream tropical wedding - and reveals she will be planning the ENTIRE thing
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6839651/Meghans-best-friend-Jessica-Mulroney-surprises-couple-free-wedding.html
I dodn't think that I'd see her on the show again especially after the reports of losing out on the baby shower scoop and her lack of fashion styling skills.


Anonymous asked:
the sex tape was on the news in the Netherlands too.
https://skippyisheretostay.tumblr.com/

Torontopaper
https://twitter.com/torontopaper1?lang=en

Palace coup involving Christopher Geidt and Prince Charles.
https://skippyisheretostay.tumblr.com/post/183641150128/palace-coup
Hopefully he's been brought bck in by the queen as the Meghan issue should be resolved. The monachy can't have a vapid d list Aerican celebrity as their representative, who's seen to give the finger to the British people as she continues to do her own thing and "spend'/merch expensive attire and claim to be a humanitarian.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 03:08:57 am by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
lesken
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #616 on: March 23, 2019, 05:34:55 am »

I finally watched episodes of Suits. Murks is somewhat attractive but no beauty, mediocre acting and a mediocre role. There is no way she got to Harry without backing as Skippy says. what a joke she is and anyone supporting this needs to rethink their support. She is gross.
Logged

The only constant is change.
HRHOlya
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5041



« Reply #617 on: March 26, 2019, 11:03:50 am »

'Hen-pecked' Harry was made to 'banish' former wingman Tom Inskip because the royal's childhood friend advised him NOT to marry Meghan, Tatler claims

    Duke of Sussex reportedly 'banished' his childhood friend Tom 'Skippy' Inskip
    Previous reports suggested it was because he wanted to remove 'bad influences'
    However a new Tatler piece claims it is because Mr Inskip opposed the marriage 
    Palace has dismissed similar reports and said the article is 'patently untrue'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6850947/Prince-Harry-Harry-banish-former-wingman-Tom-Inskip-Tatler-claims.html
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12333


Harryite #21


« Reply #618 on: March 26, 2019, 11:49:23 am »

Wynstay1, Wrexham, United Kingdom, 2 minutes ago
Henpecked? Really? In an era of Mental Abuse being classified as Domestic Violence under the 2015 Control and Coercion Act, isn't identifying someone as 'Henpecked" actually identifying a DV victim?

MGTOW1, Deplorable, United States, 3 minutes ago
Harry's mates told him you're supposed to rent the party girls, not marry them...what a total buffoon, a couch stain on the monarchy.

Marsali , East Coast, United States, moments ago
It seems as if Harry at this point has no friends around him as he once had. Of course the optics are that he's no longer a single man and he's married now but, the sparkle and mischievous behavior that made Harry stand out from all the other royals, is gone. Meghan's influence, IMO, is not for the better for Harry or the family, it's for the worse. Before Megs came into the picture, there were no articles daily about the royal family in this vein. But now, everyday some new article is published, ripping apart certain people and the monarchy. As someone who loves the monarchy from afar, it is very sad to see how a woman, a feminist, could have married into this extremely traditional family and is destroying it with her greedy, bossy, controlling and narcissistic ways. It's a true shame.

Nocticula, New Orleans, United States, moments ago
Just before Inskip's wedding Harry had dumped the z lister, but she stalked him all the way to Jamaica. Their photo's from that wedding are saying all one needs to know about the hustler and the halfwit.

DuchessSerengeti, Cornwall, United Kingdom, moments ago
This was the same Tom Ukip who's wedding MM crashed? seen in photo's often by herself since she didn't know anyone there and working over a poor tipsey Harry?

McAdamia, Lisbon, Portugal, 8 minutes ago
It's getting quite heated now. More revelations to follow I'm guessing. The world can see through her eyes so no one is surprised anymore.

pendragon25, Christchurch, United Kingdom, 8 minutes ago
Marry in haste, repent at leisure, Harry!  tehe

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6850947/Prince-Harry-Harry-banish-former-wingman-Tom-Inskip-Tatler-claims.html#comments-6850947
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11176


« Reply #619 on: March 26, 2019, 12:57:33 pm »

Petition to stop funding their lifestyle.
Stop UK funding for Meghan Markle & Prince Harry's lifestyle
Since the Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle we, the people have been shocked by the exorbitant spending of this married couple. It is said that Meghan Markle (now the Duchess of Sussex) has spent well over one million pounds (£1000000.00) on just clothes in just under one year. Britain is facing Brexit and economic hardship. Many thousands are homeless and children are going to school with no breakfast, times are undoubtedly hard for working class Brits. Yet, the taxes that we pay, is going towards an American ( not even British)  woman's wardrobe allowance, also this allowance is not supporting British designers,  but mega expensive designers in America, Canada, or Europe. She has shown little or no understanding of British culture, traditions or history.
Since writing this petition, It has been suggested that Meghan Markle should NOT be allowed to use the name "Duchess", at the very least until she becomes a British Citizen. Currently she is neither a British subject not a member of the Commonwealth. Therefore it could be argued that she has no right to the title of "Duchess"
https://www.change.org/p/uk-parliament-stop-uk-funding-for-meghan-markle-prince-harry-s-lifestyle?recruiter=938120088&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

I've always said Meghan's expenditures are a drop in the bucket. Why not go for the ones who spend enough money to support a small country, like Charles and Camilla and why not stop having royals use private copters when they can take trips more inexpensively. I don't think Will and Kate come "cheap" either.

The petition won't go anywhere since the people don't have the power to strip someone of a title. She got Harry's titles automatically upon marriage. And Princesses from other countries who married British royals did not have to wait. They got the titles upon marriage.

And the exact amount spent is still not known. The DM just puts retail costs of those items.

I don't know why Meghan is said to "steal thunder from Kate". Kate has not had the best work ethic. If she had been out there more, it would have been better for her.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2019, 01:02:42 pm by sandy » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 ... 46   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!