Royal Gossip
July 16, 2018, 03:44:55 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 21   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Duchess Meghan: News and Random chat 2018  (Read 17953 times)
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
HRH Tiana of NOLA
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2584



« Reply #180 on: June 20, 2018, 01:02:13 am »

^That Hepburn reference is not a compliment.
Logged

"You just keep your eyes at one of of the biggest gaudiest floats with a Mardi Gras princess about to kissed herself a... a frog." - Princess Tiana
CathyJane
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4905


« Reply #181 on: June 20, 2018, 03:32:53 am »

No freaking way.
Logged
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13002


Lady of Threads


« Reply #182 on: June 20, 2018, 01:37:25 pm »

Meghan Markle is turning into a Kate Middleton mini-me and that's the last thing she needs

Stella McCartney was right.


Just days ago, she declared that the high neck silk crepe gown she designed for Meghan Markle’s second wedding look was her “last moment of joy” before joining the “austere...and serious royal life”. The comments sounded slightly hyperbolic - after all, what measures of austerity do one of the wealthiest royals in the world adhere to?

But Meghan’s slow dissolution of her individuality just weeks after her wedding doesn’t bode well for her future royal life, one which we were promised would be a form of female driven intelligence in Christian Louboutins; a sort of Amal Clooney with a crown type.

The royals’ limits aren’t financial ones, but personal boundaries, and that family acts as an effective vaccum that sucks up every bit of your personal identity.

After nearly 20 years with Prince William, Kate Middleton has mastered the complexities of life in the fishbowl, one which requires women to look, dress and behave in a certain way to honour traditions of the past while remaining just ‘woke’ enough for younger fans.
https://www.independent.ie/style/fashion/style-talk/meghan-markle-is-turning-into-a-kate-middleton-minime-and-thats-the-last-thing-she-needs-37026222.html

easter-lol the last thing Kate is woke same goes for Meghan .
« Last Edit: June 20, 2018, 01:44:53 pm by Fly on the wall » Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14722



« Reply #183 on: June 20, 2018, 01:43:26 pm »

^ easter-lol it is a good article but it expects too much of Meghan. She will never be as perfect as fans expect and less of all a fashion icon unless she employs a good stylist. She has never dressed well.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13002


Lady of Threads


« Reply #184 on: June 20, 2018, 01:50:50 pm »

they put these celebs on such a high horse like the can't be touch,and no one is perfect and we all have flaws
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
lesken
Baroness
***
Online Online

Posts: 697


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #185 on: June 20, 2018, 03:51:33 pm »

 In Meghan case it wouldn't hurt her to look more like Kate Middleton because at least Kate has some taste in style. Like I said before her style is sex kitten Hollywood LA bohemia.  she doesn't look bad in that type of dress. But she can't wear it where she is now so she's just going to have to have someone help her dress.
Logged

The only constant is change.
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 8510


« Reply #186 on: June 20, 2018, 06:25:03 pm »

I am not so sure Kate has taste in style at least all the time. Kate took a while to learn the ropes about weighting her skirts. I don't think the new generation of royal wives are all that in the fashion department.
Logged
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14226



« Reply #187 on: June 20, 2018, 08:11:06 pm »

The issue with Sparkles is that I believe there were certain expectations that she’d be more mature, experienced in public attire and savvy on public/media display.  She is not.  The fact is, she had wardrobe people who managed her better in Hollyweird than the BRF.  Her own sense of style is quite dismal left on its own as his her behavior.  We get slinky catwalk one time then overwhelmed clingy kitten the next.  It’s a shame she’s such a phony because it shows.
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13002


Lady of Threads


« Reply #188 on: June 20, 2018, 09:59:14 pm »

Meghan Markle Pregnant With Twins NOT Confirmed By Palace, Despite Report
Kensington Palace did not confirm Meghan Markle is pregnant with twins, despite a new tabloid cover story. Gossip Cop has actually already busted false claims that Markle and Prince Harry are expecting. Now we can set the record straight again.

The new cover of OK! exclaims, “Meghan’s Twins Announcement: It’s A Boy & A Girl!” The front of the issue also features a teaser declaring, “Palace Confirms.” But Markle did not make any public announcement, nor has the palace issued any confirmation that she’s pregnant. This cover was deceptively designed to lure in readers. After consumers shell out $5.99 for a copy, it becomes clear inside the issue that the tabloid has no legitimate proof at all to back up this narrative. In fact, the allegations are based solely on unnamed, untraceable “insiders,” who claim without evidence that Markle is “already expecting Prince Harry’s offspring.”

It’s alleged, according to these unidentifiable “palace insiders,” that the newlyweds “found out they were pregnant as soon as they returned from their private honeymoon to East Africa.” The couple is described as “so thrilled” that they’ve “already started spilling the beans,” informing Prince William, Kate Middleton, Prince Charles, Duchess Camilla and “even the queen.” A so-called “source” is quoted as saying, “They didn’t expect it to happen so soon, and they were all the more giddy to learn they were having two — one a boy, the other a girl.”
https://www.gossipcop.com/meghan-markle-pregnant-twins-palace-confirmed-false/

How many twins will Meghan be pregnant with before she really is pregnant
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
meememe
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2455



« Reply #189 on: June 21, 2018, 12:33:07 am »

Every couple of months from now until the first baby is born - whether twins or not. Then about a year's rest and it will start again - until she is in her mid-late 40s and no more babies are coming.

It was the same with The Queen - from about 1955 onwards she was 'pregnant' every other month according to various magazines. They were right twice of course.

Same with Kate - with each pregnancy she has been pregnant with twins and with Charlotte and then with Louis allegedly George and then George and Charlotte let is 'slip'. Of course they were wrong.
Logged
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3450


« Reply #190 on: June 21, 2018, 06:51:40 am »

Unless Meghan was pregnant before the wedding, I think it's too soon to tell the gender.
Logged
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2817



« Reply #191 on: June 21, 2018, 11:38:29 am »

There are tests you can run especially if the twins are IVF twins which at Meghan's age is the only way she can get twins.
Logged
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3794


« Reply #192 on: June 21, 2018, 12:45:39 pm »

Meghan will be 37 in August. Crown Princess Mary of Denmark had twins Josie and Vincent in January 2011. She was 39 years old the next month, having been born in February 1972. I've never read she had IVF to conceive them. And a sister in law had boy twins at 41, and that sure was without IVF!
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14722



« Reply #193 on: June 21, 2018, 01:37:30 pm »

It was rumoured it was IVF but they denied it. It is also different if you had kids before that age or not.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3794


« Reply #194 on: June 21, 2018, 01:58:41 pm »

According to this article though, it's women over thirty (with no family history of twins) who are more likely to conceive them without fertility treatment. And not every women in her late thirties who ends up with twins has them through IVF. I've known several older mothers who had twins years ago without IVF who just happened to marry late.

https://www.verywellfamily.com/what-are-my-chances-of-having-twins-1960180
Logged
lesken
Baroness
***
Online Online

Posts: 697


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #195 on: June 21, 2018, 02:09:57 pm »

I've known several career women who have had their first children in their forties. None of them had twins.  and I only know one for sure that didn't have IVF. I have also know many women including myself that stop being fertile in their late 30s.  but since we had enough kids we didn't need to have IVF to get pregnant again. Megan is almost 37 so she will be trying anyway she can to get pregnant as soon as possible. what surprises me is that she never had any children before because many actresses do.
Logged

The only constant is change.
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13002


Lady of Threads


« Reply #196 on: June 21, 2018, 03:47:02 pm »

Meghan Markle is ‘tending the Queen’s LONELINESS’ following Prince Philip’s retirement

MEGHAN Markle appears to be tending to the Queen’s loneliness at Royal engagements following Prince Philip’s retirement from public life in the summer of 2017, a leading expert has claimed.

James Brookes told Express.co.uk the Duchess of Sussex’s trip with Her Majesty to Cheshire showed the Royal pair “get along well” and Elizabeth II looked “genuinely happy to have some company”.

He said: “The images of them both in Cheshire speak for themselves.

“The Queen looked incredibly at ease and genuinely happy to have some company on an engagement again.

“Although The Queen’s sense of duty trumps all, we have to remember that it will no doubt feel a bit lonely for her, now that Prince Philip’s retired.
“Clearly, she and Meghan get along well and it was good to see them exchanging a few laughs and chuckles.”

The Royal commentator claimed the Duchess of Sussex’s invitation to board the Royal Train is a “big step” and declared the Queen most likely took the opportunity to speak with her granddaughter-in-law.

Mr Brookes also said the Duchess of Sussex was “no doubt slightly nervous” ahead of the engagement but Her Majesty’s “words of wisdom” would have put her at ease.

He went on: “There’s no denying that Meghan being invited onboard the Royal train is a big step, especially given the speed at which it’s happened after the wedding.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/977368/Meghan-Markle-is-tending-to-the-Queen-s-loneliness-following-Prince-Philip-s-retirement


UM the Queen went on many events with out PP and she does just fine she's far from lonely

Meghan Markle consoles Sophie of Wessex after she's ATTACKED by bug during Royal Ascot

Meghan Markle and Sophie Wessex shared their carriage with their respective husbands as they arrived at Royal Ascot 2018.

The Countess of Wessex and the newly-minted Duchess of Sussex were seen chatting amiably before the bug appeared to fly too close to the Sophie' ear, making her flinch.

Meghan can be seen trying to reassure the Countess with a hand on her shoulder, seemingly asking whether she is ok.

But Sophie appeared to recover quickly as she soon laughed the incident off with her nephew Prince Harry and his new wife.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/977568/Meghan-Markle-Royal-news-Sophie-Wessex-Royal-Ascot-2018-bug-attack-watch-video
« Last Edit: June 21, 2018, 03:54:30 pm by Fly on the wall » Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14226



« Reply #197 on: June 21, 2018, 03:52:26 pm »

^Seriously.  How on earth did the Queen manage before the power of Meghan arrived?  Nonsense.  And over-sell bordering on desperate.
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
lesken
Baroness
***
Online Online

Posts: 697


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #198 on: June 21, 2018, 05:17:28 pm »

Wow this is the second bug attack on a royal where Megs
Is around patting them and consoling. Wonder if she has an in with the bugs.
Logged

The only constant is change.
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13002


Lady of Threads


« Reply #199 on: June 21, 2018, 08:11:58 pm »

Meghan Markle - an apology
On 12 June 2018 we published an article under the headline "Meghan Markle's steamy photos used as evidence in court case over Kate Middleton topless pictures."

On 12 June 2018 we published an article under the headline "Meghan Markle's steamy photos used as evidence in court case over Kate Middleton topless pictures."

The article reported that lawyers for Closer magazine were using provocative images of Meghan Markle to support their argument that the magazine had paid too much in compensation for publishing topless photographs of the Duchess of Cambridge.

Meghan Markle's lawyers have informed us, and we accept, that no provocative images of Meghan Markle were used in the proceedings. We apologise for our error.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/corrections-clarifications/meghan-markle-an-apology-12757386
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 21   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!