Royal Gossip
April 20, 2019, 02:03:58 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 ... 31   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Wedding Day May19th  (Read 33472 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dianab
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2409


« Reply #440 on: May 24, 2018, 05:58:58 pm »

I think you're right but for someone as insecure as murky this is not good
chelsy too was reported being insecure and needy during her time/years with harry... i've always found her and harry too similar to their own good, highly wild, free-spirited pair as well insecure and needy people ... she obviously has a ULTRA-RICH daddy and dont needs (really she has NO GOOD REASON TO) join the crazy, stiff and out of touch Windsor world.

I dont believe in this story because Harry is obviously madly in love with Meghan IMO and in all likelihood she'll be his (WELL DESERVED) karma re:he being a awful boyfriend to Chelsy and Cressy
« Last Edit: May 24, 2018, 06:05:26 pm by dianab » Logged
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010



« Reply #441 on: May 24, 2018, 10:52:22 pm »

Here is more gossip about the wedding. Juicy gossip.

The Beckams's marriage is a sham. They are together as part of the brand they have built but he's apparently a ladies man

Quote
Blind Item #16
It used to be that this long time married foreign born permanent A list celebrity the whole world knows would keep his indiscretions far from home. Then, they got closer but with very discreet people who ensured that everyone remained silent through the threat of force is necessary. Then, he got involved with someone closer to home who told a few friends which is how we know about her. Now though, he has just become kind of semi-public with
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/05/blind-item-16_24.html

The second one is about Meghan. Apparently she invited all the A list Hollywood, just like I suspected. She invited people she has never met but wants to associate with and naturally the A-listers didn't come. They just haven't met her and unlike her and the bunch that showed up people still believe in marriage being a friends and family affair and not a networking event for a power crazed unsuccessful actress.

Quote
Blind Item #13
Apparently, this former actress turned bride invited a whole slew of A+ list celebrities to her wedding she had never invited because she wanted to meet them all. They are the same celebrities who would never have given her the time of day previous to this. Most of the people she invited said no because they thought it was weird to be invited if they had never met either person. One of those people is this A+ list mostly movie actress who is an Academy Award winner/nominee who showed the invitation to friends.
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/05/blind-item-14_24.html

The third one is the juicy one. Apparently Meggie has a celebrity crush on someone and she wanted her on the wedding. Invitation sent out and everything. But she didn't know that this celebrity had a thing with her now husband. Who would that star be.

Quote
Blind Item #14
Speaking of that wedding, it was pretty interesting that one foreign born A list mostly movie actress who is an Academy Award winner/nominee wasn't invited. Oh, our actress wanted her invited but doesn't know about the three day weekend her groom spent with the A lister. Apparently that is one weekend he doesn't want to relive. He treated the A lister like crap and she got some revenge two years later although she won't say what the revenge was.
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/05/blind-item-14_24.html
Logged

HRHOlya
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5027



« Reply #442 on: May 25, 2018, 12:03:19 am »

The Royal Nanny Made the Royal Wedding Work

Borrallo is that kind of one in a million ninja nanny.

https://images.fatherly.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Maria-B-Header.jpg?q=65&w=600

[...]

The true and unheralded hero of the royal wedding is finally getting some justified praise in the wake of the coverage glut that followed Saturday’s ceremony. Maria Borrallo, who hails from Madrid, Spain and has been in the employ of the royal family for four years, stepped into her current role shortly after the birth of Prince George. As you can imagine, Borrallo isn’t the sort of sitter who’s number you put on the fridge. She was educated at Norland College in Bath, England, where students are specifically given childcare training and has been employed by several high-profile families (none higher than the Windsors). She is frequently described as devoted to her gig.

By the end of the royal wedding, attendees were reportedly calling her “the child whisperer.” Her strategy? Bribing kids with candy. Why? Because you do what it takes on the big day. She wasn’t setting precedent; she was helping set a scene.

It was a good thing Borrallo was on the ground on the day of the ceremony. According to a report by The Sydney Morning Herald, the wedding rehearsal was a huge mess with toddlers freaking out all over the place. So next time you see a bunch of little rich kids out and about and their behavior seems just suspiciously good, look around. There probably a nanny lurking in the shadows somewhere. 

https://www.fatherly.com/news/royal-wedding-nanny-maria-borrallo/

---------

Harry and Meghan asked Kate Middleton to mind 'misbehaving' kids after chaotic first Royal Wedding rehearsal

Meghan and Harry had bravely picked 10 kids aged two to seven to be part of their wedding (all godchildren or children of close pals)

[...] Royal insiders revealed the first rehearsal was so chaotic that the tiny attendants had another practice on Friday… when it was decided their mums should ­accompany them into the chapel. [...]

They wore ivory silk frocks by Meghan’s dress designer, and white leather Aquazzura shoes, monogrammed with their initials and the wedding date. Their flower crowns and posies matched Meghan’s bouquet.

George’s fellow pages were Jasper Dyer, six, and twins Brian and John Mulroney, seven.

They wore miniature versions of the Blues and Royals frockcoats worn by Harry and William, with their initials embroidered in gold on their shoulder straps as a memento. [...]

The bridesmaids and pages held hands up the aisle behind Meghan, who handed her bouquet to the eldest girl as she reached the altar.

Cheeky Rylan, seven, wiped her hand across her brow in a “Phew” gesture, relieved they’d all made it.

The youngsters then went into a side chapel. When they re-appeared to follow the new Duke and Duchess down the aisle, George had come over all shy and tried to hide behind mum’s legs.

Unlike Charlotte, who skipped outside and stood at the top of the steps waving off Aunty Meghan and Uncle Harry like a real royal pro.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/royal-wedding-rehearsals-went-badly-12567035

-------

^ Talk of the town has been for years that the Beckhams are only together for 2 reasons: 1. a divorce would cost them too much, the division of assets etc, going on together kinda keeps their fortune and lifestyle going, and 2. it would also cost them the value of their brand, as it would over night disappear, nowadays it's even worse because their kids are also a part of their brand, it would completely ruin it.
He's a serial cheater and it seems he doesn't hide his flavour of the month even from Vic anymore, she's sometimes in his company when he talks up women. It was in the dm the other day, a woman bragging about David buying her drinks at Soho Farmhouse, Vic was there too that same evening.
See here, the comments are revealing http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5762169/David-Beckham-bought-shots-partied-socialite-night-Royal-Wedding.html

The blind on Meg inviting all of Hweird doesn't surprise me and is likely what happened. So much for "only family and friends", but "we'll axe a good bunch of family off anyway and invite Oprah and the Clooneys! Yaaay!" No wonder those 3 showed up, they are hungry.

The 3rd one is wowzers!! Who could it be and what is the revenge?
H treating a woman like crap isn't news on a whole, it's not like he was a gentleman with Chels or Cress. Chels got physically attacked and provoked by paps and was often crying and pictured so (over years!) and H never wrote an idiotic statement for her. But for "paps broke into my house, hound my street, go through my rubbish bins and call me the n-word!" (for all of 5 minutes that she was exposed as H's gf and boom) Murkles did. What a man.
Diana got spat on for a reaction by the paps, Camilla got quite a beating from the paps and public, Chelsy got a beating over years and Murky can't last 5 minutes (with totally made up claims!) before crying "wolf" and Hazza came straight out and strikes with his statement of dumb.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 12:08:17 am by HRHOlya » Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11159


« Reply #443 on: May 25, 2018, 12:21:01 am »

The parents are responsible for the children. And of course the nanny. I don't think they need to be "ordered" to do it. Kate and Nanny Maria were visibly taking care of the children at Pippa's wedding too. Where Kate had a meltdown over George.
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12320


Harryite #21


« Reply #444 on: May 25, 2018, 01:59:02 am »

Prince Philip soldiered on through the royal wedding despite a cracked rib following a fall in the bath just days before Harry and Meghan tied the knot
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5769605/Prince-Philip-soldiered-royal-wedding-despite-cracked-rib.html#ixzz5GTEnnddc
Wow.

Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15366



« Reply #445 on: May 25, 2018, 02:09:41 am »

^Honor is duty.  What a man, really. 
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11159


« Reply #446 on: May 25, 2018, 02:18:16 am »

I hope he has a bathtub that is safe for elderly people.  If not equipped with guard rails, etc. it's very dangerous.
Logged
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13797


Lady of Threads


« Reply #447 on: May 25, 2018, 02:21:02 am »

Yikes
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12320


Harryite #21


« Reply #448 on: May 25, 2018, 02:50:43 am »

Meghan's £200k gown was identical to one of mine, says designer who created the wedding dress for the Duchess of Cambridge
Quote
Designer Emilia Wickstead — a favourite of the Duchess of Cambridge — claims the Duchess of Sussex’s wedding dress is identical to her own £7,000 gown.
Created by Givenchy’s Clare Waight Keller, Meghan Markle’s £200,000 dress was kept under wraps for months until the big day.
‘Her dress is identical to one of our dresses,’ says Wickstead.
‘Apparently a lot of commentators were saying, “It’s an Emilia Wickstead dress.”’
The designer went on to have a bit of a dig at Meghan’s look.
She says: ‘If you choose a simple design the fit should be perfect. Her wedding dress was quite loose.’
And she didn’t approve of the bride’s relaxed hair style: ‘I was like, “Hold the wisps [of her hair] back — it’s a Royal Wedding for God’s sake.”'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5769693/Meghans-200k-gown-identical-one-says-designer.html#ixzz5GTRDjld5
 eating cookies
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15366



« Reply #449 on: May 25, 2018, 02:56:17 am »

^They’re not identical but her waist design is perfection.  With a modified neckline, it’s much nicer than Sparkles’.  And she’s right sbout the fit and her sloppy hair.  Dead right.
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
HRH Tiana of NOLA
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2788



« Reply #450 on: May 25, 2018, 03:09:56 am »

^^Not even a week in and she's already getting dragged.

The dress was also identical to the one Angela of Liechtenstein wore at her wedding.
Logged

"You just keep your eyes at one of of the biggest gaudiest floats with a Mardi Gras princess about to kissed herself a... a frog." - Princess Tiana
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 12320


Harryite #21


« Reply #451 on: May 25, 2018, 03:47:43 am »

It seems like the wedding was rushed because and was requested to go through by the government because it made the royal family and the UK look accepting of all faiths and ethnicities that'll be good for trading post Brexit. This is, IMO, why the royal family was seen bending oer backwads to be nice to Meghan. By having Meghan now under the control of the royal family, there won't be the chaos on KP social media pages like there was during the engagement. IMO, her being booted out by Charles from the BP garden party and her getting a senior staff member to train her for 6 months, gives the perfect excuse to keep her hidden and also her family away from the press so that they can get KP offices and personnel on track and look serious and competant as well as prepare Wills for his visit to the Middle East.
quote]While individual royals have visited Israel in a private capacity, there has never been an official trip on behalf of the Government.[/quote]
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5769295/Prince-William-visit-West-Bank-official-trip-Israel.html#ixzz5GTbfRxf3
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 03:55:14 am by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
buflesse
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3620



« Reply #452 on: May 25, 2018, 08:02:17 am »

Meghan's £200k gown was identical to one of mine, says designer who created the wedding dress for the Duchess of Cambridge
Quote
Designer Emilia Wickstead — a favourite of the Duchess of Cambridge — claims the Duchess of Sussex’s wedding dress is identical to her own £7,000 gown.
Created by Givenchy’s Clare Waight Keller, Meghan Markle’s £200,000 dress was kept under wraps for months until the big day.
‘Her dress is identical to one of our dresses,’ says Wickstead.
‘Apparently a lot of commentators were saying, “It’s an Emilia Wickstead dress.”’
The designer went on to have a bit of a dig at Meghan’s look.
She says: ‘If you choose a simple design the fit should be perfect. Her wedding dress was quite loose.’
And she didn’t approve of the bride’s relaxed hair style: ‘I was like, “Hold the wisps [of her hair] back — it’s a Royal Wedding for God’s sake.”'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5769693/Meghans-200k-gown-identical-one-says-designer.html#ixzz5GTRDjld5
 eating cookies

Love it.
Logged
HRHOlya
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5027



« Reply #453 on: May 25, 2018, 11:27:56 am »

^ Me too, Emilia's comments are spot on. Esp the hair was bad. Though K's was too on her day... Kate-Horror-Queen
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #454 on: May 25, 2018, 11:55:40 am »

Weird she said this. She must have had a problem with Meghan??
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11159


« Reply #455 on: May 25, 2018, 12:28:40 pm »

It seems like the wedding was rushed because and was requested to go through by the government because it made the royal family and the UK look accepting of all faiths and ethnicities that'll be good for trading post Brexit. This is, IMO, why the royal family was seen bending oer backwads to be nice to Meghan. By having Meghan now under the control of the royal family, there won't be the chaos on KP social media pages like there was during the engagement. IMO, her being booted out by Charles from the BP garden party and her getting a senior staff member to train her for 6 months, gives the perfect excuse to keep her hidden and also her family away from the press so that they can get KP offices and personnel on track and look serious and competant as well as prepare Wills for his visit to the Middle East.
quote]While individual royals have visited Israel in a private capacity, there has never been an official trip on behalf of the Government.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5769295/Prince-William-visit-West-Bank-official-trip-Israel.html#ixzz5GTbfRxf3

[/quote]

She was not "booted out" of the Garden Party. IMO, for one thing, Charles got a lot of mileage out of playing the wonderful old Gentleman being so accepting of all ethnicities and races, escorting her mother on one arm and Camilla on the other and the coup, escorting Meghan down the aisle. I think Charles can be credited with having enough brain cells not to mess up and evict the same woman he was so "kind to" from a Garden Party. I think even with his big ego, he knows he is on thin ice with some and would be severely criticized. They are not going to hide out Meghan and undo all the "acceptance" and "inclusion" of Meghan. Camilla should be thankful she got in and can't act all "Grand" with anybody no matter how much they dress her up and trot her out.

I notice they are not keeping quiet the loud mouth half sister who caused much of the problem. Will is not going to prepare well for his trip, he admits he doesn't. I hope he doesn't whinge about his kids keeping him up. He can be embarrassing.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 12:30:27 pm by sandy » Logged
Joanna
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 329


Daenerys Stormborn, the true Queen


« Reply #456 on: May 25, 2018, 12:43:07 pm »

Isn't Emilia Wickstead one of Kate's go-to designers?
 I don't know if Emilia has some kind of issue with Meghan, must she must realise that saying these things wouldn't portray her in the best light but it takes courage and honesty to say exactly what you mean, for that I applaud Emilia. The photo of an Emilia Wickstead's wedding dress is really pretty, it would've been better than the ill fitting Givenchy dress. However I believe the ill fitting form can't be blamed on the designers nor the seamstresses.
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #457 on: May 25, 2018, 12:46:30 pm »

Emilia sometimes also makes dresses with many problems and very similars to Meghan's so it is a bit ironic. But she knows Meghan will probably not work for her so it is weird.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11159


« Reply #458 on: May 25, 2018, 12:51:25 pm »

I think you're right but for someone as insecure as murky this is not good
chelsy too was reported being insecure and needy during her time/years with harry... i've always found her and harry too similar to their own good, highly wild, free-spirited pair as well insecure and needy people ... she obviously has a ULTRA-RICH daddy and dont needs (really she has NO GOOD REASON TO) join the crazy, stiff and out of touch Windsor world.

I dont believe in this story because Harry is obviously madly in love with Meghan IMO and in all likelihood she'll be his (WELL DESERVED) karma re:he being a awful boyfriend to Chelsy and Cressy

Ironically, Chelsy was heavily criticized and was often held up in comparison against "Perfect"!!! Kate. But Chelsy did get a degree and is an entrepreneur. I don't think she'd waste her time crying over Harry. IT's been over for years now.
Logged
HRHOlya
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5027



« Reply #459 on: May 25, 2018, 02:12:54 pm »

^ I think so too.

^^ & ^^^ I agree. I like that Emilia had the balls to say her opinion, but it is odd as she's possibly alienating a (high profile) customer. Unless Kate has some hold on Emilia and Emilia is "Team Kate", but I find that theory quite far reaching and doubt very much that's it. Remains still weird to alienate a possible client that way, but props for being honest and not bow to "royalty" in that sense.

A problem sure is that a tonne of clothes are similar to each other and it's hard to determine, never mind claim, intellectual property over a design. That design wasn't novel either, it was done by Givenchy himself for Audrey Hepburn and in more recent years high profile/ royal/ noble women wore very similar dresses by various designers..

That some people thought it was Wickstead's is believable, hers is very similar and people familiar with Em's dress would have made the association quickly.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 ... 31   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!