Royal Gossip
October 23, 2018, 12:25:29 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 50   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are engaged II  (Read 49542 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13199


Lady of Threads


« Reply #140 on: January 07, 2018, 05:34:19 am »

Yeah I'm going go with Meghan just had lunch with friends ,but that's too boring so the DM had to spice it up a it .



Meghan Markle Is ‘Super Exhausted’ After First Christmas With Prince Harry And The Other Royals – Here’s Why!

Apparently, even though Meghan Markle seemed to do really well during the royal Christmas celebrations alongside her fiancé Prince Harry, she is now really exhausted and is hopeful that she’ll be able to get a breather really soon. The American actress carried on with a smile but she was tired nevertheless, a palace source told us.
Markle managed to carry her first ever royal duties with a lot of grace, but following the busy holiday season, she is already exhausted!
Ever since she and Harry confirmed their engagement back in November, the pair has been attending many events, and she’s been non-stop meeting members of Harry’s family.
‘Meghan’s feeling utterly exhausted right now. Spending Christmas with the Queen of England is as daunting as you’d expect, despite the Queen going out of her way to make Meghan feel comfortable and accepted, as she always does. Meghan has never had to be this mindful of every single thing before, and it’s incredibly draining,’ the insider dished.
http://celebrityinsider.org/meghan-markle-is-super-exhausted-after-first-christmas-with-prince-harry-and-the-other-royals-heres-why-99648/?tag=meghan-markle
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
meememe
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2526



« Reply #141 on: January 07, 2018, 05:34:43 am »

My sister-in-law organised her bridal lunch the day before her wedding, back in 1982, because her family lived in Queensland while she and her husband to be lived in Sydney and his family lived in rural NSW. As a result the only time both families could do anything 'pre-weddingish' was the day before the wedding and the only person who could organise it was my sister-in-law as she was the one 'on the spot' while everyone else in the wedding party wasn't arriving in town until the Friday morning with the wedding on the Saturday.

As Meghan, no doubt, will want family and/or friends to attend from the US but she will be the one on the ground in the UK it makes sense for her to organise it - she will know the places to go etc and can be the 'go-to' person.

I have friends who had to do the same thing when family members had to come from overseas for the wedding.
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #142 on: January 07, 2018, 06:25:05 am »

MEDIA ADVISORY: Will the IRS Know What Gifts Prince Harry Gives Meghan Markle for Christmas?
http://www.capdale.com/media-advisory-will-the-irs-know-what-gifts-prince-harry-gives-meghan-markle-for-christmas
The royal family/Harry has to deal with the IRS.
 
It seems all of this wedding planning is all from her. KP did say that only her and Harry are doing the planning, and we know Harry's not going to talk to the press, so..The artcles are still very sarcastic though even though she seems to be paying for the pr push.

Meghan Markle Was Reportedly Totally On Board With Nude Scene, Claims Director Who Was ‘Pressured’ Into Writing It
Quote
Meghan Markle dodged a bullet that could have been a major embarrassment for the royal family. In the 2015 film, Anti-Social, director Reg Traviss was pressured to write a nude scene for the Suits star. While Traviss rejected the push to get Markle naked for the cameras, he believes she would have signed off for the nude scene if asked.
http://celebrityinsider.org/meghan-markle-was-reportedly-totally-on-board-with-nude-scene-claims-director-who-was-pressured-into-writing-it-101759/?tag=meghan-markle
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3200



« Reply #143 on: January 07, 2018, 07:48:07 am »

For sure, especially if she's already under audit for fraudulent expense claims and it's easy to raise suspicions because the articles were stating that PH is taking her out to dinner, to the theater,etc. and it's not her and her Tig exploring London. Any gift ...like let's say a $75K engagement dress is not a free gift in the eyes of the law.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Online Online

Posts: 9143


« Reply #144 on: January 07, 2018, 12:37:30 pm »

The DM never said that full price was paid, they did say there was a possibility the dress was sold at discount. I believe MEghan will honor her debts to the IRS regarding dress and other possible gifts. She probably has a CPA on call. Generally, the actual price paid rather than assessed value is what needs to be declared.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 12:39:23 pm by sandy » Logged
Little light
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1247



« Reply #145 on: January 07, 2018, 01:32:04 pm »

^^^^^^Ariel

Diana married on 29th July 1981. She was born on 1st July 1961, so that made her 20 years old when she was married. Still very young.

 And she was a star then too. Some say even before she married when she was dating Charles.

That aside, I agree with your comments.  flower
Logged
YooperModerator
Super Moderator
*****
Online Online

Posts: 14654



« Reply #146 on: January 07, 2018, 01:37:37 pm »

^^She has no choice.  It's either pay up or a boat load of trouble with the IRS.  Nobody gets a trophy for following tax guidelines.  They'll find out exactly how much everything cost, was gifted, or wasn't reported.  Including tax.

The thing with that dress is, Sparkles is used to having anything she wears fall under a business expense or promotion.  This is not.  This is personal income or outlay.
Logged


\\\"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\\\"  Thomas Jefferson
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #147 on: January 07, 2018, 04:02:28 pm »

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'DENIED' their choice of reception venue as royal aides opt for a more 'practical' option
Quote
But the pair have reportedly been denied their chosen venue for the wedding reception - the 'dreamy' Frogmore House.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5243595/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-denied-choice-venue.html#ixzz53VzE4jym
Quote
A source said: 'They would have loved Frogmore for the party, particularly Meghan who has called it 'dreamy', but they have been told St George's Hall is far more practical.
Quote
'One person who would have readily approved of their choice was the Queen, for whom Frogmore is a very special place.
thumbsup
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5243595/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-denied-choice-venue.html#ixzz53VxuUoAz
Nice one, keep smacking this mess down and downgrading until the whole sicke wedding's denied; not oficaially approved.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 04:04:34 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
lesken
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1001


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #148 on: January 07, 2018, 04:18:21 pm »

We have a new tax law starting this year which Megan's enemy Trump got passed and will help her make even more money as her tax bracket will go down.  But a lot of her deductions are going to get taken away here. However people making a lot of money are supposed to doing better with this new tax law. So maybe she should invite him to the wedding. He won't go for many reasons but one of them is I don't think Britain wants him there and I think he's sensitive to that since he cancelled the State trip.  In any event I still can't believe this is really happening and how Harry can make such a bad choice.
Logged

The only constant is change.
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #149 on: January 07, 2018, 05:40:28 pm »

Revealed: The Christmas present Meghan Markle gave the Queen that left her in 'HYSTERICS' (and it was almost stolen by the corgis)
Quote
According to the Daily Star Online, Meghan, 36, bought Her Majesty a singing toy hamster which, according to the paper, left the the monarch in 'hysterics'.   
A source said: 'Meghan bought a little hamster that sings with a little rope for Her Majesty.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5243909/Meghan-Markles-Christmas-present-Queen-revealed.html#ixzz53WMTOZym
Rubbish. IMO, Christmas was only about the pr photo op.

‘It hasn’t been easy. Meghan’s relationship with Harry has shone a spotlight on our family’: Meghan Markle's half brother blames drunken New Year's Eve brawl with his fiancee on scrutiny from his sister’s engagement
‘We’ve been under a lot of stress because of all the attention. At some point you find yourself drinking too much to escape the pressure.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5243881/Meghan-Markles-half-brother-blames-brawl-scrutiny.html#ixzz53WNNAATq
 tehe maybe he just likes to drink and brawl.
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13199


Lady of Threads


« Reply #150 on: January 07, 2018, 05:52:13 pm »

Yeah blame it on the alcohol .maybe just maybe if they stop going to the press or giving the press what  they want they will be left alone .

Singer hamster,cute
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4008


« Reply #151 on: January 07, 2018, 06:07:51 pm »

^^^^iF this report is true (of Frogmore being denied for a reception) the reason is far more likely to be for security. Things have changed since 2008 when the Phillips had their after-wedding celebrations there.

 St George's Hall is no downgrade. It's actually part of Windsor Castle, which is far more prestigious than Frogmore, lovely though Frogmore is. St George's is a magnificent setting for any reception.
Logged
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #152 on: January 07, 2018, 06:20:02 pm »

^true. He should learn the words; no comment.
Quote
For the gravest threat the Crown faces today isn't republicanism but Hello!-ification: the excruciating way in which the younger Royals have joined in the appalling commercialised celebrity culture which dominates our benighted age.
"The Firm", as our monarch likes to say, turned out mob-handed, led by the Queen herself and Prince Philip.
Did they know that 60 pages of photographs of the wedding would immediately appear in Hello! magazine?
They can scarcely have failed to notice the cameras inside the chapel and then at the reception at Frogmore House, all for a reported £500,000 as a nice little wedding present.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1021316/Peter-Phillipss-Hello-wedding-Autumn-grasping-vulgar-damaging-Queen.html#ixzz53WVnrW1j
Gossip is that Meghan's been denied the carriage ride like Autom and Peter had at their wedding. Peter got int trouble because he sold the right to the wedding to Hello magazine. Don't be surprised if therre's an article regarding Mehgan wanting exclusive press coverage from the same magazine. The artice's really critical of the House of Windsor being dragged down to celebrity types. It did ook bad to see the whole affair spread accross the pages of Hello magazine though. Hard to believe that was a mere 10 years ago and the cost for the reception was £500,000. That couldn't be right unless they had to pay for the rental and the company to kit it out. Anyway, the royal family will get creamed the longer this farcegoes on and Mehgan seemingly demanding expensive things like the brides have gotten before her.
http://people.com/royals/you-will-never-believe-how-this-strange-smelling-harry-and-meghan-portrait-was-made/
This is a very dirty innuendo regarding skid marks on the carpet. It seems like every article regarding her alludes to sex or something crass.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 06:22:06 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4008


« Reply #153 on: January 07, 2018, 06:50:03 pm »

^ Gossip from whom? From Tumblr and Twitter, other online gossip sites? Autumn and Peter just had a carriage ride to Frogmore from St George's Chapel. They didn't go around the streets of Windsor, (in another direction) which is what will follow Harry and Meghan's church ceremony, and which followed Ed and Sophie's. As, according to this article, (and we don't know whether it's true) the reception is to be held within the Castle complex, then there'll be no need for a carriage ride to Frogmore.

As with other Royal weddings pub hours are likely to be extended on that weekend. The Home Office is beginning a four week consultation on various planning measures for this wedding including security arrangements.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-42595480
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 06:57:37 pm by Rosella » Logged
lesken
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1001


Live, Love, Laugh


« Reply #154 on: January 07, 2018, 07:04:15 pm »

I would like someone to answer my question either Pro or anti Meghan as to why the royal family is accepting her given all the junk and baggage she has compared to other people. The fact that she found the Royal Christmas exhausting is telling. I think she was on her good behavior obviously and that took a lot of effort to try and please that many people. Actresses are not used to having to please people they're used to being pleased unless it's a director or producer and depending on the weight of the actor they may not listen to them either. This is going to be a big lesson to Megan because when she goes out on Royal assignments she has to be humble to the public whether she likes it or not and that goes for any state functions excetera. This is something she's not used to now having been on Suits. And she is not going to like being dictated to. But that doesn't mean she won't  get used to it And tow the line.  Anything is Possible. Just explain to me why the royal family doesn't seem to see all of this or maybe they do and just don't care but why don't they care is my question. Is it because they're scared Harry's going to bolt. Thank you for listening.
Logged

The only constant is change.
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #155 on: January 07, 2018, 07:30:10 pm »

^IMO, it's been about race from her from the beginning. That idiculous statement regarding her being attacked by social media and press trolls and basically calling people in the UK racists is why she's seemingly getting "accepted". It's smoke and mirrors thugh becuse I believe the royal family's playing the race card right back at her and when this farce comes to an end, she'll not be able to accuse anyone of racism. or anyone else as it seems like the world's gone pc and diversity mad. 
**the Home office should be using their time with sorting out the failed asylum criminals that need to be booted out of the UK. Besides, she'll not be able to get a spuse visa and it'll cause a justified riot if she's passed over the usual demands for a foreigner to marry a British person. Also, she'll need to again convert to COE, not to mention the IRS pocking around.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 07:36:57 pm by windsor2 » Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
HRH Tiana of NOLA
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2785



« Reply #156 on: January 07, 2018, 07:33:31 pm »

If we're going with the theory that the Firm really isn't for this union, they can't show public disapproval without running the risk of being accused of racism. Add to that the stigma of Diana and it's pretty obvious why they would walk around on egg shells.
Logged

"You just keep your eyes at one of of the biggest gaudiest floats with a Mardi Gras princess about to kissed herself a... a frog." - Princess Tiana
windsor2
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10958


Harryite #21


« Reply #157 on: January 07, 2018, 07:50:46 pm »

She might be a sociopath narc who threatened to harm herself if Harry dumps her. She reminds me of Amber Heard and Jodi Arias; crazy scary, cold.
Logged

Keep Calm and Carry On
Rosella
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4008


« Reply #158 on: January 07, 2018, 09:01:31 pm »

Harry is popular among members of the Royal Family, including Charles's siblings. They aren't afraid he's going to bolt. If he was going to do that he would have done it before now. IMO Meghan has been on her best behavior when meeting them and exhibited some charm and politeness, and interest in them all.

Charles smiled at her on the church steps. Waity and William were talking to her. I don't believe the BRF, especially the older members, read online gossip, or the Fail. Charles certainly doesn't, nor can I imagine the Queen doing so.

IMO they've welcomed Meghan because they believe she and Harry are happy together and will be happy together in future years, but I don't expect my explanation of why she's been accepted to be believed here on the forum.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Online Online

Posts: 9143


« Reply #159 on: January 07, 2018, 09:51:02 pm »

Despite all the naysayers, the royals might actually like Meghan. What goes on behind closed doors is known only to them.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 50   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!