Royal Gossip
April 19, 2019, 09:51:41 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Prince Carl Philip and Sofia expecting first child ~ Christening 2016  (Read 16508 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kolkomilko
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3197



« Reply #60 on: May 13, 2016, 01:05:08 pm »

Beautiful, charming and natural photos. I agree, Sofia does her best and I think she will precede Waity.
Logged

gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10107


« Reply #61 on: May 13, 2016, 01:08:10 pm »

She appears to have achieved more in her first year of marriage into the Swedish rf than council cath has achieved in 5 years, and never will achieve.  Sofia wants to fit in  -  council cath wants to take the rf down to her level (succeeding right now) and wants it all her own way, break traditions, flash her body, shows little intelligence when she goofily talks to the public.  Without the two sprogs these days she has no small talk, and we don´t buy the busy mother/housewife, we know the nanny minds the sprogs 24/7 and there is a housekeeper and full team of staff to do all the housework, cooking etc.  And still she cant string an intelligent sentence together.
Logged
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6863


« Reply #62 on: May 13, 2016, 02:04:51 pm »

I'm telling you there is some brain damage going on with The Potato Head and The Duke of Dumb Dork.
Logged
Miss Hathaway
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2493



« Reply #63 on: May 13, 2016, 03:18:20 pm »

Well, I have to disagree that Sofia has changed or will be an asset to the SRF . . . Sofia quietly formed a business with her father and sister (Sofia's family is the Swedish equivalent of the Middletons, and perhaps worse):

http://www.svenskdam.se/2016/05/prinsessan-sofia-har-startat-hemligt-foretag/

". . . Aftonbladet that now reveals Princess Sofia secret business. The company goes by the name "SKB Sweden AB," was formed in November last year, writes Aftonbladet. Board are two people from Sofia's family: Princess Sofia's father, Erik Hellqvist is a director and his little sister Sara Hellqvist's deputy. The company's address is H. M. King the Royal Treasurer of the Court. The castle. Although it has been on the court's information department no idea when the company Aftonbladet first contact them. Later will come the court's CFO Jan Lindman and confirms that it is Sophia who is behind the company.   This is a brand newly established limited company. It's just like you're saying that the board consists of Erik and Sara Hellqvist, says Jan Lindman Aftonbladet.   According to documents sent to Companies Registration Office, the company will have several areas of activity, as consulting in leadership and business development, sales in the textile and clothing industry and management of movable and immovable property, and related business."

Now Daniel, who married Vic, the Crown Princess, received lots of criticism over his health clubs and Chris, married to Maddie, has received lots of criticism for his business dealings. Sofia just keeps popping up with lots of "goodies" such as the house in South Africa, and now this company . . . who knows what else?   But, then, she is consistent.  She used her body to grab a prince, and now she is going to grab all the money and influence she can because I believe she knows her days as a member of the SRF are numbered.  She cannot keep up the pretense, and when Vic ascends the throne, it won't be worth her staying in. 

Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #64 on: May 15, 2016, 02:26:56 pm »

From what I read in other forums they can be a partner in companies but they can't have managing functions. Though here it sounds super weird that these three are now experts on these areas.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #65 on: September 06, 2016, 10:05:11 pm »

Reminder that tomorrow that the christening is the 9th of september
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Miss Hathaway
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2493



« Reply #66 on: September 07, 2016, 02:24:26 pm »

I have read that all of the king's sisters have declined their invitations to attend the christening of the former porn model's child.    Hi
Logged
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6863


« Reply #67 on: September 07, 2016, 08:31:53 pm »

That would be really stupid.
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10107


« Reply #68 on: September 07, 2016, 10:04:29 pm »

If she is good enough for her husband then the family just need to get on with it.  We have council cath, the stalker, killing kittens frequenter, yacht "entertainer", flasher extraordinaire of the higherst order of all her intimate parts. always looking to hump Ben Ainslie´s leg.  No difference really between her and Sofia.  If his family want to boycott the christening of a child who had nothing to do with all that then they really are very sad people.
Logged
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6863


« Reply #69 on: September 08, 2016, 12:17:35 am »

The Swedes are way above the British RF in all areas.
Logged
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 38563



WWW
« Reply #70 on: September 08, 2016, 03:12:21 am »

If she is good enough for her husband then the family just need to get on with it.  We have council cath, the stalker, killing kittens frequenter, yacht "entertainer", flasher extraordinaire of the higherst order of all her intimate parts. always looking to hump Ben Ainslie´s leg.  No difference really between her and Sofia.  If his family want to boycott the christening of a child who had nothing to do with all that then they really are very sad people.

Amen! This kid needs love and deserves support and these two old cows are snubbing an innocent kid. As for the Swedes, at least Sofia isn't a hypocrite about her past life and has been a wife who has done her bit and is around her husband all the time, not her family. She looked beautiful at her wedding and certainly in love. Her gesture for everyone to join her on the dace floor was poignant and showed good generosity of character.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
Miss Hathaway
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2493



« Reply #71 on: September 08, 2016, 04:23:48 am »

Oh, but Sofia is not good enough for her husband.  She's a porn model.  Among other unsavory things.  She is a hypocrite about her past life and has had much removed from the internet.  But much has been saved, too bad for her.  She is not in love with her husband, in my opinion, based upon her body language and behavior.  She is rumored to be the one behind the hit pieces on Madeleine and Chris.   No one wants her to work for their charity and so early this year, the king took the honorary chairmanship of Sophiahemmet University from his sister, Princess Christina and handed it to the former porn model. Two of his sisters married commoners and so lost their royal titles, while the porn model got the full title and one of their jobs.

It is no wonder that the royal princesses are showing their disapproval of the way things are being handled by the king.  Good for them.  The sooner Victoria can ascend to the throne, the better, in my opinion.
Logged
kolkomilko
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3197



« Reply #72 on: September 08, 2016, 08:01:25 am »

We have spoken about Sofia a lot here. She has mistakes and she is followed by her past, that's true. We can't see behind the door but she seems to try to adapt herself to the Swedish RF. As for me they seem to love each other and their child. People seem to take notice of the fact that she is Philip's wife and the SRF received into the family. People like and respect them. Sofia hasn't had trespasses and hasn't had been a disgrace to RF as Waity did several times. To tell the truth Sofia was a porn modell but Waity doesn't do anything definitive, doesn't try to adapt herself to the RF and they didn't receive her into the RF. This situation is a shame, I think. Waity's best peculiarity that she wasn't a porn modell but nothing more.
Logged

gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10107


« Reply #73 on: September 08, 2016, 10:08:48 am »

^ Agree.  She pleasant woman who is trying her best to be a good member of the family. She appears to love her husband and child, they seem quite happy together.  Many people make mistakes, it does not mean you can´t give them a second chance. As for council cath, she has had many chances, more than she should have been given, and still she dresses like a slapper and wants to expose her body any chance she can get.  Slept her way through boys to get to bill medd.  Might not be porn, but it certainly is not something to be proud of.  Like her sister, went around the block a few times to stalk what she wanted.  I personally do not consider council cath any better then Princes Sofia, both have behaved shabbily in their past, but one thing I will say for Sofia is that at least she has not continued her vulgar shenanigans into her marriage. Council cath 5 years down the line and still not mended her ways, if anything she has become worse in that time  -  her mishaps are no longer mishaps, she apepars to have an obsession with exhibiting her naked personal parts.  Bhutan War Memorial a prime example, Bhutan a very windy place, a public memoiral service, under international scrutiny, and she wears the frock that has more scope than Marilyn Monroe´s famous pose for the wind to lift it up and procure another flashgate.  Apart from the flashgate viewpoint there is the major insult to Bhutan and their War Memorial.  Full marks to Sofia trying, I cannot say the same about council cath, she is still trying to expose as much of her body as she can, not given up on that front yet.

I hope Sofia continues to move forward and live a full and happy life with her husband and son  -  gorgeous little chap, image of his bio father.
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3126



« Reply #74 on: September 08, 2016, 10:18:30 am »

^Considering waity's lifestyle etc before she was married is she any better than a porn model ?
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10107


« Reply #75 on: September 08, 2016, 10:23:09 am »

^Actually no, she used to "entertain" on those expensive yachts didn´t she, among many other things.  NO difference at all, other than Princess Sofia is doing her best in her new life to fit in and make good, whereas council cath is also doing her best  -  to continue dragging the rf into the gutter  -  maybe that is her mission in life, who knows.  Give me Princess Sofia any day, she sure outshines council cath in every way.
Logged
kolkomilko
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3197



« Reply #76 on: September 08, 2016, 11:29:00 am »

^ I do believe it, too. Let's give her a chance.  thumbsup
Logged

Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #77 on: September 08, 2016, 01:30:11 pm »

I haven't seen Kate naked or with a snake between her nude legs. Because x princess is not appropriate for her role does not mean x is.

I defend the right of having a republican head of state that is a porn model or whatever. I am feminist and I do mot think that being a sex worker means they are worse than me or inferior. Everyone has the right to do with their body whatever they want.

But monarchy sells a hiatoric image and it needs it to survive for this reason Sofia is a wrong choice. Also people cannot choose their their representants so the less the royals could do is choose someone who has the right qualitites. And this is the reason most if not all princesses are wrong for their role in this generation.

If you have lots of righta you also have obligations.

Sofia is a bad partner to an already bad prince. Maybe there will not be a lot of controversies in their life but they already have hurt the monarchy image.

Still I am curious if they will give this christening more pomp than to Madde's children.

CG obsession with CP must have caused a quite toxic family relations so who knows what is going on with his aunts.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
HRHOlya
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5023



« Reply #78 on: September 08, 2016, 01:59:39 pm »

 goodpost

CP marrying S has hurt the mage of the SRF quite a good bit, as has CG. The republicans are considerably on the rise, even though Vic & Dan are well liked.
S has made interesting (to say the least) comments re violent physical attack since marrying in, has frequently made gaffes, offended and no charity wants her, which is why she is still with playground and why she was given Sofiahemmet. She is said to talk to the press and be behind the bad rep Madeleine & Chris get, and she has more than once given the SRF the big ole middle finger with disrespect and not following orders and the wish of CG & Silvia.

The RF that seems to be watched the most here are the Brits, but when you go elsewhere where people keep as close an eye on the Swedes as we do here on the Brits, you'll see that Sofia is as unsuitable as Kate is, and not simply because of her saucy past. They both should not have married in and both are causing damage and are disrespectful, unapologetic about their discrepancies and do little to better themselves and their image.

I will give Sofia that she did impress on her engagement yesterday, as she was for once better dressed and learnt her speech, ie she did not read it but only glanced at her notes every once in a while, as it should be.

PS: Quite funny though that some who watch the SRF closely but not the BRF say that Kate is better than Sofia, and those who watch the BRF closely but not the SRF say that Sofia is better. Those who keep an eye on both know that both are terrible choices as additions to any RF. The grass is never greener elsewhere!
« Last Edit: September 08, 2016, 02:04:28 pm by HRHOlya » Logged
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 13797


Lady of Threads


« Reply #79 on: September 08, 2016, 03:32:21 pm »

Prince Carl Philip and Princess Sofia attended a symposium at Royal Palace

http://www.newmyroyals.com/2016/09/prince-carl-philip-and-princess-sofia.html
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!