Royal Gossip
November 25, 2017, 01:44:48 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Establishment and Child Sex Abuse  (Read 11158 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« on: February 11, 2015, 04:45:03 pm »

This whole child sex abuse situation seems to be leaking out all over the place now. 

THE PAEDOFILE: MI5 ‘gave Geoffrey Dickens Michael Portillo’s name’ for his dossier

https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2015/02/08/the-paedofile-mi5-gave-geoffrey-dickens-michael-portillos-name-for-his-dossier/
Logged
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5079


« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2015, 06:22:09 pm »

Yes, it is all coming out now and everyone of them needs naming and shaming.   They have got away with it in the past but now with so many coming forward with the same story and people ready to listen the perpetrators are shaking in their boots waiting for that knock on the door.
Logged
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5079


« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2015, 07:41:51 am »

Much talk on other forums about below

Insiders working for the BBC claim that there is an atmosphere of fear surrounding the Jimmy Savile child abuse scandal that the corporation was enveloped in from 2012, with staff saying that nobody dares mention the scandal for fear of losing their job.

A small group of executives at the BBC are firing or demoting any journalist who was or is currently involved in the exposure of Jimmy Savile abusing thousands of children.

http://yournewswire.com/bbc-fire-staff-who-exposed-jimmy-savile/
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2431



« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2015, 11:20:56 am »

More coming out

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166722/Man-raped-Cyril-Smith-sue-Lib-Dems-250-000-Victim-claims-delivering-leaflets-alleged paedophile-MP-time-effectively-employee-party.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166708/Senior-MP-accused-child-sex-abuse-Two-MPs-report-serving-Labour-politician-police-sex-attacks-corruption-claims.html
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2015, 04:48:38 pm »

The leaks are coming out all the time now, that little crack in the dam must be getting wider and wider by the week.  Take that lot out of the Government and how many would be left, not a lot by the sound of things these days.
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14123



« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2015, 07:10:32 pm »

The most interested thing I've read this week

Quote
The surveillance on the suspected alleged paedophile - codenamed Operation Saturday - caused him concern, he says, because he couldn't understand why MI5 was doing it.

"It involved extremely powerful, wealthy people. It was a very need to know job... We were given the scantest of briefings on it. All of a sudden the job stopped. I did actually question why were we doing paedophiles - it wasn't in our remit.

"The trouble with the police is they move from job to job. Special Branch only do it for three or four years. Then they go onto CID or some other job. There was a strong suspicion of corruption within the police, whereas MI5 was more highly trusted."

The operation ended after a few weeks - Acott says the target was using drugs and prostitutes, but he saw no signs of child abuse.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33543352

Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2015, 08:34:22 am »

Seems to be more and more articles coming through now

http://news.sky.com/story/1523577/key-westminster-figures-in-child-abuse-papers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3171095/Senior-Westminster-figures-1970s-1980s-named-government-child-abuse-files.html

About time too, when I think of all those poor little souls abused for the pleasure of these vile people it makes me want to vomit, big time.  Little souls have their lives ruined forever, and for what, just for these depraved people who know what they are doing is wrong, but rely on their mates to cover it all up for them.  The whole lot are rotten to the core, and these are the people who run our country.  You couldn´t make it up.  They need to be found out, and get punished.  But at least we get to know who some of them are, and no matter what they say mud like this sticks.  Even hardened criminals can´t stomach paedophilia, it is well know in prisons that they have to keep them separate, as the other inmates would "sort them out".

One of them names appears to be a cousin/uncle or something to Tom van Straubanzee, godfather to sprog II and a pal of bill medd  How nice to have such lovely connections, not.
Logged
Countess of Holland
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2050


« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2015, 09:19:58 am »

The connection between the two Straubenzee's isn't very close.

William van S. (1924-1999) -> father Arthur Bowen van S. -> Arthur Hope van S. -> Bowen van S. -> Thomas van S. (1782-1843).

Thomas van S. (1982-) -> Alexander van S. -> Henry Hamilton van S. ->Henry Turner van S. -> Turner van S. ->Henry van S. -> Thom van S. (1782-1843)

So the William van Straubenzee that is named in the article is a 3rd degree cousin of the grandfather of Thomas van Straubenzee. Hardly a close family connection. I am sure that if we are looking this deep into our own family tree we all find 3rd degree cousins of one of our grandfathers who has done something unsavoury or downright illegal.

I am not a big fan of the Cambridges and I question the sanity of all who choose to be friends with the couple, but to declare Thomas van Straubenzee as 'guilty by association' of sex-crimes of a distant cousin/ uncle that is pushing it a bit too much for me.

PS Edited by me: the information on the Van Straubenzee-family I found at this website:
http://www.thepeerage.com/i3368.htm#s48792
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2431



« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2015, 02:09:38 pm »

Sky News has been trying to get these papers for ages and now the last person named in them is dead someone suddenly finds the papers??!!  Forgive my cynicism but the the trouble is TPTB lie so often these days I wouldn't trust them to give me the correct time of day
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2015, 04:39:18 pm »

Still a Straubenzee family link though, whatever way you look at it.  A lot of aristo families are quite close, or at least a lot of them are in the UK - they like to stick together, have a good idea why but won´t put it on here.
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2431



« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2016, 01:50:18 pm »

I thought investigations linked to Janner was shelved as he had died but it appears not



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3483918/Lord-Janner-abused-position-MP-sexually-assault-30-victims-hotels-children-s-homes-1955-1988-inquiry-historic-abuse-hears.html
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2016, 03:57:03 pm »

Easy to go after the dead ones.  However, if nothing else, it is still getting it out there that he was a alleged paedophile, that in itself is worth something, and some sort of retribution for the poor souls he disgustingly used and abused for his own pleasures.
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9578


« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2016, 04:55:49 pm »

Quite shocking really  -  over 130 MP*s/councillors on child abuse register.


https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/12832430_1690575221214163_4182139135159727803_n.jpg?oh=ac01f354697962cc5a3c551563a760e7&oe=5752B343
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!