Royal Gossip
April 26, 2019, 01:19:27 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Diana was pregnant?  (Read 19320 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kolkomilko
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3197



« on: January 11, 2015, 02:47:47 pm »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2905239/Diana-pregnant-Dodi-s-child-died-Paris-car-smash-sensational-West-End-play-claim.html   huh
Logged

Countess of Holland
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2050


« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2015, 06:09:10 pm »

Isn't this the same play that stirred up the rumors about Harry and Hewitt by having an actor portraying Hewitt telling the audience that he knew Diana two years before Harry was born?

Sounds to me like the writers of the play just added a lot of innuendo and fake scandals in the play to get more press-attention and as a result more visitors.
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2015, 09:45:11 pm »

This is not new in any case, wasn't there also a rumour that they take out her uterus?
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6873


« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2015, 10:48:01 pm »

Yes, they took out all of her organs. That is horrifying. Why did they do that?
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2015, 10:54:23 pm »

^I've never understood it either, I doubt it's some kind of british tradition like the austrian did with the heart.

Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11197


« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2015, 06:53:19 pm »

They embalmed her very fast. Supposedly on orders from the royals which was very odd since Diana was no longer married to Charles.
Logged
spanishlover
Baroness
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 577


want to find real love at last!


« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2015, 12:54:47 am »

Yes, they took out all of her organs. That is horrifying. Why did they do that?
creepy!! wonder if they also took them out to hide the evidence  spy
Logged
mrharrywales
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1029


Harryite #24


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2015, 01:10:19 am »

But what did they do with her organs anyway?

Do you guys think that hadn't they taken her organs someone would come out confirming her pregnancy?

She died in Paris, and her body staid over there for hours before being returned to England, so if she was really pregnant the french doctors would know, and they wouldn't have a reason to keep that information from the public, imo.
Logged


Don't worry, be Harry
Keep calm and Harry on
What happens in Vegas, not always stays in Vegas
CathyJane
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5377


« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2015, 03:49:08 am »

For what's worth my opinion is Diana wasn't pregnant; she may not have been the brightest cheese in the pocket but she wasn't about to risk losing her boys by getting knocked up and single. As for the embalming I think it was MI-5 and Chucky's  way of discrediting her so promote Camster, as always.
Logged
mrharrywales
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1029


Harryite #24


WWW
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2015, 12:49:05 pm »

At that point she was already divorced, so why would she lose her boys if she got pregnant from another man?

Doesn't make sense to me :/
Logged


Don't worry, be Harry
Keep calm and Harry on
What happens in Vegas, not always stays in Vegas
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11197


« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2015, 02:20:24 pm »

Had she been pregnant, I think she and Dodi would have gotten married. She had indicated she very much wanted another child.

It will never really be known however. I don't get why Charles had a say in anything after she died--he had divorced her. It should have been up to her sons and the Spencers, what happened.
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15304



« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2015, 04:28:18 pm »

They embalmed her very fast. Supposedly on orders from the royals which was very odd since Diana was no longer married to Charles.

do you know if it's typical of the windsors or spencers or something like that? All that happened after the crash is odd really.

Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Countess of Holland
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2050


« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2015, 05:11:50 pm »

Most royals are embalmed. The Spanish are the odds one out, theyr are first left in a kind of anti-chambre for 30 years and after that the bones are placed in a small casket and that casket is put in the Royal Panthenon.

But the Dutch royals are always embalmed after death, and IIRC Queen Ingrid of Denmark was also embalmed. So that makes me believe it is a Danish tradition as well.

It has been done for ages to royals so that the body would remain relatively 'fresh' for the days between death and funeral. Sometimes there were weeks in between death and funeral as to give relatives as well as subjects time to visit the body of the deceased. And all before cooling installations, it would have given quite the stench.
And with embalming the stench is much less, especially when done properly.

The Egyptian pharao's were the first to do it. Years ago I was in Egypt (when it was still pretty stable and safe) and there was a wall-carving in one of the old temples and all the instruments used for the embalming process were carved into the wall. Our guide explained the use of all instruments...pretty gruesome so I won't repeat it here  tehe
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11197


« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2015, 06:04:03 pm »

Diana was not married to the Prince of Wales anymore so her situation was different. 
Logged
mrharrywales
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1029


Harryite #24


WWW
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2015, 07:26:59 pm »

Most royals are embalmed. The Spanish are the odds one out, theyr are first left in a kind of anti-chambre for 30 years and after that the bones are placed in a small casket and that casket is put in the Royal Panthenon.

But the Dutch royals are always embalmed after death, and IIRC Queen Ingrid of Denmark was also embalmed. So that makes me believe it is a Danish tradition as well.

It has been done for ages to royals so that the body would remain relatively 'fresh' for the days between death and funeral. Sometimes there were weeks in between death and funeral as to give relatives as well as subjects time to visit the body of the deceased. And all before cooling installations, it would have given quite the stench.
And with embalming the stench is much less, especially when done properly.

The Egyptian pharao's were the first to do it. Years ago I was in Egypt (when it was still pretty stable and safe) and there was a wall-carving in one of the old temples and all the instruments used for the embalming process were carved into the wall. Our guide explained the use of all instruments...pretty gruesome so I won't repeat it here  tehe

Ohh yeah that's right.

I had forgotten egyptians paharos did that! But I had no idea the BRF did that too Tongue
Logged


Don't worry, be Harry
Keep calm and Harry on
What happens in Vegas, not always stays in Vegas
KGap
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 481


« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2015, 11:56:38 pm »

I doubt the entire truth about Diana will ever be revealed.

I've read she was dead on arrival to the hospital, which I can believe. I know the ambulances in France operate differently. But I wish she was scooped and rushed to hospital, It may have saved her life.

I don't think she was pregnant. Diana was a smooth operator. Not going to get knocked up by some random playboy.

I do believe it was an accident. I think the windsors were exhausted dealing with her and kind of relieved at the time.

Is she really buried at althorp? I doubt it.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11197


« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2015, 01:05:14 am »

Diana was still alive when the ambulance go to the hospital. But she had a heart attack as she arrived there.

The Windsors are a bunch of cold fish. Charles was relieved because he got the heirs from her and also had the mistress.

The slow trip to the ambulance was suspicious particularly since they went by a hospital closer to the accident scene.
Logged
KGap
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 481


« Reply #17 on: January 14, 2015, 01:33:32 am »

She was not an average patient. She should've been rushed to hospital. I still can't believe she is gone.
Logged
meememe
Duchess
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2663



« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2015, 02:22:05 am »

That have a different protocol in France and the rushing to the hospital isn't their way. They had to stop a couple of times to revive her alone the way - so if they had rushed her there and not stopped then she would have been DOA. They past one hospital to get to the one that had the specialist care she would have needed and because the actual specialist doctors worked there. Not every hospital is equipped equally to handle every type of emergency. She died because her injuries were too extreme because she didn't wear her seatbelt.

Charles went to collect her body, with one or two of her sisters (can't remember) as the representative of her underage next of kin. Surely no one is suggesting that a 15 and 12 year old boy should have been sent?? Charles as their father and the man with whom they were staying at the time went in their stead.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11197


« Reply #19 on: January 14, 2015, 02:26:42 am »

It is not known if she would have lived with a seatbelt. The car hit a wall--hard and at high speed and I doubt she would have made it in unless she had a timely trip to the hospital. There were rumors that the seatbelt malfunctioned. The bodyguard has amnesia and is no authority as to why the seatbelts were not used much less if they even worked.

Anybody bleeding to death needs to get to a hospital ASAP. The "rules" of the ambulance protocol could have been broken to save someone's life. Anybody who had a relative treated in that fashion could have sued for malpractice and won the case.

The slow ambulance doomed Diana.

I think the Spencers could have represented Diana's and Charles' sons  instead of her ex who was done with her years before she died. No nobody is suggesting anything of the sort about William and Harry going  but when I saw Charles I thought what's he doing there? Frances was never even allowed to see her daughter's body before she was buried but Charles gets to call the shots. Something wrong with this picture.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2015, 02:29:38 am by sandy » Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!