Royal Gossip
September 24, 2017, 04:57:35 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The new Princess of Asturias  (Read 1670 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Countess of Holland
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2050


« on: June 26, 2014, 07:57:33 am »

Found this on the English pages of El Pais. I don't think it was posted here before.

http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/06/04/inenglish/1401890774_944817.html?rel=rosEP
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9550


« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 11:32:50 am »

Princess Leonor is a gorgeous little girl.  Fell in love with her when Infanta Sofia was born, quite the star of the show visiting the hospital and a great hit with the crowd.  She looked like Queen Sofia then at that tender age.  Thanks for posting. great to see.
Logged
FrederickLouis
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2017, 10:24:28 pm »

Princess Leonor is the heiress to the throne. When she becomes the Queen Regnant, what will her regnal name be? Would she be Queen Leonor I or Queen Leonor II?     
Eleanor (Leonor) of Navarre (1426-1479) was the daughter of King John II of Aragon and Queen Blanche of Navarre.   
This Leonor was the Queen Regnant of Navarre in 1479. She reigned January 28, 1479 to February 12, 1479. Her coronation occurred January 28, 1479.
Logged
Joanna
gossip insider
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


Isabella of Portugal, Holy Roman Empress


« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2017, 01:08:14 am »

She will be Leonor I, because she will be the first queen named Leonor after the Kingdom of Spain's unification, as far as I know, I could be mistaken though.
Logged
FrederickLouis
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2017, 09:42:59 pm »

Queen Isabella I's husband was King Ferdinand II of Aragon. He was also known as King Ferdinand V of Castile. 
When King Philip V's son Ferdinand became King in 1746, he reigned as Ferdinand VI. He did not use the Roman numeral III and be known as Ferdinand III. Would it have been possible for him to be Ferdinand III instead of Ferdinand VI?
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14037



« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2017, 10:23:05 pm »

^They will go for whatever they think best. Not much interest in protocol or history or anything.
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!