Royal Gossip
May 28, 2017, 07:19:46 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Guess the Next Scandal! II  (Read 42416 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 35302


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #280 on: January 26, 2017, 07:27:31 am »

That won't matter.

She's destroyed enough careers and I am sure the press has a lot of dirt they're dying to release. She had no business being naked in the first place.

I do think that Uncle Gary will be providing fresh messes to enrich tabloids and it will provide a pretext for further investigation into his activities.

As for France, I think this is overstepping the bounds. Kate isn't French (or a victim) and certainly has no business using French laws against anyone; this isn't even a lawsuit like Caroline of Monaco, this is a criminal trial. That is what makes this so out of line on Kate's part.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2951


« Reply #281 on: January 26, 2017, 07:39:49 am »

She was naked in view of the street. It doesn't matter what lens was used, anyone could have seen her. It's not like she was inside and they used a drone to fly over and get a photo, or peeking in through the window. This is ridiculous that she's allowed to do this.
Logged
meememe
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2126



« Reply #282 on: January 26, 2017, 09:18:49 am »

She was only in view of the road, not a street with other houses etc, but a road through countryside, with long-range lens. The house is barely visible with the naked eye from the road let alone specific individuals and that is an invasion of her privacy. She was on private property and far enough from any public road to expect a level of privacy. That is why the photographers are facing charges - because the privacy laws in France do give that degree of protection.
Logged
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 35302


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #283 on: January 26, 2017, 09:45:15 am »

She needed to keep her clothes on and not expose herself; we live in dangerous times and it could have easily been someone with less friendly intentions. There are security guards looking for this kind of stuff, it's not their job however to look for photographers. I actually think her prosecuting photographers is the new scandal really. She needs to let it go and get on with her life and not keep this going.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
Sheridan_is_appalled
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 495



« Reply #284 on: January 26, 2017, 01:55:09 pm »

^^ Also in plain view of any RPOs present and other household staff, plus any security cameras on the premises.  Maybe even Google Earth.  laugh
Logged

I haven't played since I stopped
deGuernsey
Baroness
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 798



« Reply #285 on: January 26, 2017, 02:37:52 pm »

^ I still say KM was in on it, she knew the paps would take her picture and even called the paps or knows who did with her consent. Yes, I believe she was in on it from the start. Perhaps the paps should be suing and exposing HER!!!  eating cookies No pun intended.
Logged
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5997


« Reply #286 on: January 26, 2017, 04:07:12 pm »

The Obscenity Loved Doing It. She gets off on it. Nut Job.
Logged
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2951


« Reply #287 on: January 27, 2017, 05:18:29 am »

She was only in view of the road, not a street with other houses etc, but a road through countryside, with long-range lens. The house is barely visible with the naked eye from the road let alone specific individuals and that is an invasion of her privacy. She was on private property and far enough from any public road to expect a level of privacy. That is why the photographers are facing charges - because the privacy laws in France do give that degree of protection.

If that's the case then all cameras and photographers need to be banned. Why does it matter what lens was used? Anyone could have taken that photo if they were at the right place at the right time. They did not trespass in order to obtain the photos. Kate should have kept her clothes on, nasty, disgusting woman.  thumbsdown
Logged
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 35302


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #288 on: January 27, 2017, 06:24:16 am »

^ I still say KM was in on it, she knew the paps would take her picture and even called the paps or knows who did with her consent. Yes, I believe she was in on it from the start. Perhaps the paps should be suing and exposing HER!!!  eating cookies No pun intended.


She was looking straight at the photographers numerous times! There is no way she didn't see or know a photographer was there!
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
kolkomilko
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3085



« Reply #289 on: January 27, 2017, 09:37:38 am »

^ Yes, that's my opinion, too.
Logged

LadyVi
gossip insider
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 159


« Reply #290 on: April 01, 2017, 02:21:09 pm »

Does anyone think we'll ever get something like this again when/if there's another scandal?

This is the most PDA I've ever seen them do even if it was for PR. I forgot what the scandal was though

http://theduchesscambridge.tumblr.com/post/87019651322/credit-to-whomever-made-it
Logged
HRHOlya
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1008



« Reply #291 on: April 01, 2017, 03:07:21 pm »

^ The day before uncle Fester's interview went public, so they did this, trying to distract public & media from said interview.
I don't think we'll get any kinds of PDA for scandal distraction, esp not this "level", that's what the kids are for these days...
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9276


« Reply #292 on: April 01, 2017, 06:15:31 pm »

Body language not that warm either even then.  The really do not seem to appear to have a warm kind of bond, they are just two people, end of.
Logged
Whiffy Leaks
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 397


« Reply #293 on: April 01, 2017, 07:47:00 pm »

Imagine how embarrassing it could be for her if part of the paps defence is that she's flashed her foofoo and arse repeatedly and anybody that wants to could just google and see that. So it's not as if they're showing anything new. And she's certainly got no boobs so showing them isn't really an issue.
Logged
Sheridan_is_appalled
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 495



« Reply #294 on: April 01, 2017, 08:15:01 pm »

Kate will become the patron of the Legs Together charity, the entire UK is afflicted with nonstop laughter.
Logged

I haven't played since I stopped
HRH Tiana of NOLA
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1821



« Reply #295 on: April 02, 2017, 09:32:10 pm »

^Hahahahahahaahhaha!!!!!  laugh laugh laugh laugh
Logged

"You just keep your eyes at one of of the biggest gaudiest floats with a Mardi Gras princess about to kissed herself a... a frog." - Princess Tiana
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 35302


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #296 on: April 02, 2017, 10:09:15 pm »

Imagine how embarrassing it could be for her if part of the paps defence is that she's flashed her foofoo and arse repeatedly and anybody that wants to could just google and see that

I do think after this, the European press will likely never forgive her or give her indulgent press coverage. It'll be all over for her and a criminal conviction over a set of photographs will only lead to a lot of unofficial condemnation and this whole thing reeks of the BRF bullying the French judicial system around. Kate is just doing this because she can, along with being able to get away with shoving so many people around. This is such a violation of national sovereignty and I am certain that this will have behind closed doors  pushback via the French and other powerful people.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
One of the Peasants
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1935


Neighhhhhh, this recipce needs oatssssss


« Reply #297 on: April 20, 2017, 12:18:06 am »

Wasn't this video of a polluted couple coming out of Bouji's, drunk PDA doesn't count/it is all beer goggles from that moment on
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 [15]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!