Royal Gossip
October 23, 2017, 09:01:29 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Were Charles and Diana Taken in by Sir Jimmy Savile?  (Read 34338 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #160 on: November 20, 2014, 08:56:58 am »

Interesting article

http://yournewswire.com/royals-and-thatcher-to-blame-for-jimmy-savile-scandal-says-noel-edmonds/
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9559


« Reply #161 on: December 03, 2014, 01:31:17 pm »

VERY INTERESTING STORY.  Not sure if posted elsewhere, couldn´t find it  -  if so please delete this comment mods  -  thanks.


Royal cover up: Police censor Jimmy Savile interview transcript
alleged paedophile Jimmy Savile named the royal family in his bombshell interview with police but any mention of them was removed from the released transcripts.


http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/346148/Royal-cover-up-Police-censor-Jimmy-Savile-interview-transcript

Look at chucky´s face here last night, not a happy bunny is he, wonder if he knew the story was about to be printed?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/12/02/23AEB48600000578-2858178-image-12_1417563850534.jpg
« Last Edit: December 03, 2014, 01:34:45 pm by gingerboy24 » Logged
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #162 on: December 03, 2014, 07:13:14 pm »

There are so many stories/rumours about the RF's involvement (and more) with Saville.  Before it all came out there were 'photos everywhere of them socialising with him and they also even awarded him a Knighthood!!!!   It suddenly all went quiet and people were asking why but received no answers of course.  I personally always thought him to be the most revolting specimen and could never understand his closeness to the RF.
Logged
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #163 on: December 07, 2014, 04:47:08 pm »

This pic seems to be popping up everywhere.
If in wrong thread please change Mods.

http://yournewswire.com/jimmy-savile-and-prince-charles-the-alleged pedophile-connection/

Logged
Fly on the wall
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11627


Lady of Threads


« Reply #164 on: December 09, 2014, 08:51:35 pm »

delete
Logged

NEVER *despise* correction,for those who correct you ,truly LOVE you .They are willing to displease you and possibly lose your friendship ,rather than see you destroyed. Those who *despise* you ,on the other hand ,will allow you to FAIL...because what do they care ?

Every praise is not good and every criticism is not evil..!
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #165 on: December 14, 2014, 10:48:35 am »

Last few paragraphs of an interesting article by Tom Mangold, investigative journalist in today's Sunday Mail.

'Take the slow boiling scandal involving paedophilia rings and Westminster notables, and, this week, the row over the cover up of the CIA’s torture interrogation techniques — some of which were learned from Britain’s brutal behaviour in Northern Ireland — which were well known to Westminster governments of both stripes at the time.
Which is why I would argue that investigative journalism, for all its occasional dreadful mistakes, bad apples and cock-ups, is still a crucial part of the DNA of our democratic genes in Britain.
When establishments seek to control us, we should recognise that this is the thin end of the wedge. It is important to note that the Leveson Inquiry — set up to look into the ridiculous follies of phone-hackers (they even bugged my phone to find out what Panorama was up to, for Heaven’s sake!) — have led to serious attempts to constrain the Press and introduce an element of political involvement in our editorial freedom.
But this will merely take us back to where we were 40 years ago. I strongly believe there is one thing that we must remember above all. When any citizen wants help to expose corruption, hypocrisy, wrongdoing or corrosive inefficiency, there must be a newspaper, magazine or broadcast office which he or she can contact for help.
The British Establishment’s protective walls of secrecy of the Seventies will never be completely breached, but we can try to remain truly independent, vigilant and deserving tribunes of the people. That is our democratic duty and happens to be what we do best.'
Tom Mangold was senior correspondent of BBC TV Panorama from 1976-2003.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2872344/From-Thorpe-alleged paedophile-MPs-torture-ruling-elite-try-cover-sins-bids-constrain-media-insidious.html#ixzz3Lrrp2FFw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9559


« Reply #166 on: December 14, 2014, 03:11:33 pm »

Could agree with him more Val, the press are gagged far too much, and we all know why.  Paedos, *nasty* politicians, the royal family, they do not stand up to scrutiny, hence they want the press silenced.  Be interesting to see what happens when the tories are no longer in power, and chief butt sniifer to the royals  -  "call me dave" is no longer around to protect them - does beg the question doesn´t it.  No doubt "call me dave" would never have done away with Royal Yacht Brittannia.  "call me dave" has done the voters no good at all as far I am aware, and many are defecting to the Republic Campaign.
Logged
Alexandrine
Super Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14097



« Reply #167 on: December 22, 2014, 07:05:41 pm »


If the abuse of children by politicians is a conspiracy it needs to be put to rest
The reported disbanding of the abuse inquiry panel suggests that facing up to the truth is low on the government’s list of priorities

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/22/abuse-children-politicians-conspiracy-panel

good article
Logged



“Three things are to be looked to in a building: that it stand on the right spot, that it be securely founded, that it be successfully executed.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #168 on: December 22, 2014, 08:26:40 pm »

It is alleged that it is definitely low on the government's list of priorities because it involves many politicians and members of The Royal family.  Fortunately there are many other groups working behind the scenes who are determined not to let it rest.
Logged
dianab
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1435


« Reply #169 on: June 12, 2015, 11:02:26 pm »

How Savile seduced the royals: As it's claimed he nearly became godfather to Harry, how the predatory DJ wormed his way into the very heart of Palace life
-Serial alleged alleged alleged alleged alleged paedophile inveigled himself into Prince Charles' life as a mentor
-He was granted unprecedented access across all of the royal palaces  
-Even the Queen couldn’t resist his charm — or so he liked to claim
-But Diana found him 'creepy' and recoiled after he once licked her hand

Quote
After inveigling himself into Charles’s life as a mentor and adviser, Savile was granted unprecedented access across all the royal palaces upstairs and downstairs.

Quote
‘He was in and out of Buckingham Palace,’ recalls a footman. ‘He would often ask if there was any gossip about the royals, and when you look back, maybe he was building up information which would be useful to him if he ever needed leverage. Lots of people were taken in by his fame, which he used to get people to open up to him. I never heard tales of any sexual abuse, but it was perfectly normal to see him with an arm round the young housemaids and other female servants.

Quote
However, it was the patronage of Prince Charles which was to provide him with his passport to the royal household, and to weasel his way into the circle of one royal after another.
Savile was so close to Charles that not only did he advise on the appointment of a senior aide, but also sacked another figure because, I was told, the Prince didn’t have the stomach to do it himself.
Astriking indication of Savile’s reach — and the Prince’s questionable judgment — came in 1990 when Charles asked him for advice before choosing Major-General Sir Christopher Airy to be his private secretary. Savile and Charles then met Airy before he was offered the post.
Around that time, Savile took it upon himself to deliver the coup de grace to another prominent aide who had fallen under royal disapproval. Princess Diana insisted to me that Savile did the firing because ‘my husband couldn’t bear to’.
Unlike Charles, Diana was suspicious of Savile, the only man the Prince permitted to smoke in his home. ‘She was wary because she worked out that he was using the royals for his own publicity,’ the Princess’s former bodyguard Ken Wharfe tells me.

Quote
‘He would turn up unannounced at Kensington Palace,’ recalls Wharfe. ‘He would bamboozle the police on the gate and just breeze in. He would tell Diana he was on a mission “from the boss”, in other words her husband, but he just wanted to check up on her.’
He even arrived out of the blue during a walkabout the Princess was doing in Leeds. ‘He wasn’t meant to be there and we didn’t want him there, but there he was,’ says the ex-policeman. ‘He turned it into a Jimmy Savile visit. She was right to keep him at arm’s length.’ Later, Diana herself told me she had always found Savile ‘creepy’. She said that she had once recoiled from him when he went to greet her with a kiss to her hand, but had instead licked it.

Quote
‘Like the Fool in King Lear, he was allowed to say things to Prince Charles that other courtiers were not,’ Diana’s former private secretary Patrick Jephson told me.
On one occasion, Charles was getting tetchy because the royal train was running late. Savile, who was with him, asked: ‘What do you want me to do? Shoot the station master?’
He used the same easy familiarity to persuade staff to let him come and go as he pleased at St James’s Palace.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3122130/How-Savile-seduced-royals-s-claimed-nearly-godfather-Harry-predatory-DJ-wormed-way-heart-Palace-life.html

 Tongue ps.I dont want/wish be on the skin of Charles when the Queen be gone...  eating cookies that's for sure laundry
« Last Edit: June 12, 2015, 11:09:58 pm by dianab » Logged
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3195


« Reply #170 on: June 13, 2015, 01:57:36 am »

Sounds like a truly creepy guy, and that Diana was a good judge of character.  thumbsdown
Logged
Val
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5015


« Reply #171 on: June 13, 2015, 08:31:23 am »

Another one PC won't live down, like wanting to be a tampon.
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2321



« Reply #172 on: June 13, 2015, 10:48:14 am »

^ Be careful what you wish for  springs to mind - do you think he believes in reincarnation? laundry
Logged
gingerboy24
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9559


« Reply #173 on: June 13, 2015, 12:20:21 pm »

IMO chucky is not a nice chap, and has some very sordid "past times".  AS for that DM article re SAvile, just about says it all really, and very revealing about chucky, and I for one am not sorry it was published, paedophilia is a big no no for me, not just with the rf and MP´s, but anyone. The harm they do to those poor kids is, in most cases, life long.  Good on the DM for publishing it.  He is such a disgusting individual.  They do say that often abused children  turn into abusers. Does make you wonder with chucky.  thumbsdown

« Last Edit: June 13, 2015, 12:23:35 pm by gingerboy24 » Logged
Miss Hathaway
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1418



« Reply #174 on: June 14, 2015, 07:53:24 pm »

The BRF, in my opinion, tend to be superficial in whom they associate with.  Do they have money, do they have connections, are they amusing, do they keep a secret?   If so, they're in.  They don't concern themselves with people's deep, dark pasts unless the media exposes it.

Logged
Tpearl
gossip insider
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 167


« Reply #175 on: June 17, 2015, 02:56:24 am »

True^^^
Logged
dianab
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1435


« Reply #176 on: June 17, 2015, 10:01:24 pm »

IMO chucky is not a nice chap, and has some very sordid "past times".  AS for that DM article re SAvile, just about says it all really, and very revealing about chucky,

And because Savile had the run of Stoke Mandeville, Broadmoor and other hospitals, Charles believed him to be an obvious person to tap for advice on Britain’s health authorities.
But health chiefs were said to have been ‘gobsmacked’ to arrive for a meeting at Highgrove to find Savile at the table. He apparently threatened the officials after the Prince left, saying making them unhappy could cost the officials a knighthood.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3122130/How-Savile-seduced-royals-s-claimed-nearly-godfather-Harry-predatory-DJ-wormed-way-heart-Palace-life.html
 ick Shocked ick

The BRF, in my opinion, tend to be superficial in whom they associate with.  Do they have money, do they have connections, are they amusing, do they keep a secret?   If so, they're in.  They don't concern themselves with people's deep, dark pasts unless the media exposes it.
Well said
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!