Royal Gossip
November 20, 2017, 07:01:43 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Charles & Diana's Marriage  (Read 25463 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Stargazer
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 347


« Reply #200 on: June 27, 2017, 01:02:07 am »

'Diana cried, ranted and kicked the furniture for six hours': How Charles's new wife hit out when he left her alone and 'nearly knocked a flunky flying' when she found a bracelet for Camilla (before he ended the romance with a sad glance at their wedding)

Author Penny Junor tells of Diana's paranoia and tantrums over the relationship between Charles and Camilla (pictured wearing a bracelet given to her by the Prince before his wedding).


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4638024/Biography-Camilla-lifts-lid-affair-Charles.html

In response to the re release of the Diana book by Andrew Morton, the Charles camp is hitting back.

It's a real hatchet job on someone who can't respond - this is only one persons account and may well be completely false. What a juvenile, cruel act, considering the recent revelations of Harry and his struggle with coming to terms with Diana's death. No wonder he's gone off to Africa. It makes me even more revolted by Cold & Cruel.
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6848


« Reply #201 on: June 27, 2017, 01:28:07 am »

Junor had this in the works since 2015, a little present for Camilla. So Diana sent a "flunky" flying across the room! Junor sounds like she's hallucinating. Even without Diana in the picture, Charles private life was one sordid mess. He hung out with couples. The PBs and the Tryons. The Tryons took Charles on a vacation. And Charles went on "dates" with the PBs. And of course Charles had a go at the wives: Camilla and Kanga. CHarles is a disgusting mess.
Logged
Stargazer
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 347


« Reply #202 on: June 27, 2017, 01:59:24 am »

 ^It does sound like fantasy, Sandy. If it's been planned since 2015 in order to besmirch Diana"s reputation on the 20th year since her death, it's even more disturbing and IMO completely backfired. It just shows how unstable and vindictive Cruella has become. She must know the effect this would have on Wills & Haza. It's not doing C&C any good at all, only reinforcing people's memories of what Diana had to endure. Vile couple.
Logged
jackiew
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 215



« Reply #203 on: June 27, 2017, 08:54:32 am »

^ITA, its proof of how self-obsessed and unrepentant C&C are.
Logged
india
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6313


« Reply #204 on: June 27, 2017, 03:29:49 pm »

I am so disgusted and sick to God of hearing about all of this.
Logged
marion
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2428



« Reply #205 on: June 27, 2017, 04:01:27 pm »

These latest revelations are sickening - why drag it all up when Diana has been dead for 20 years.  Of course we know the answer to that is to try and make camilla out to be the poor victim and of course she only renewed her relationship with PC when a couple of his friends contacted her as they were so worried about his mental state - I bet she was as pleased as punch and quick enough to whip off her "you know whats" Embarrassed

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4641418/Diana-s-threatening-phone-calls-Camilla-night.html
Logged
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6848


« Reply #206 on: June 27, 2017, 09:03:20 pm »

It's a bunch of lies. There are some writers who say Charles and Camilla resumed their relationship in 1983. I think they were in touch the entire time. Charles is pathetically using the Jane Eyre story spin, With Camilla as virtuous Jane rescuing Charles as Mr Rochester with the "mad" wife. Even down to Diana destroying Charles' art work. What a joke. Camilla IMO is a greedy woman who went about getting what the wife had.
Logged
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3195


« Reply #207 on: June 28, 2017, 01:00:15 am »

I think they resumed their affair in September 1981. I don't think Charles was faithful for very long at all, and how else did Camilla have all that inside knowledge to leak details about C&D's marriage to the press?
Logged
CathyJane
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4364


« Reply #208 on: June 28, 2017, 02:52:10 am »

Just utterly disgusting. imo C&C were never out of touch; he has always been too dependent on Cams; he's a weak willed whiney baby.
Logged
HRHOlya
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2158



« Reply #209 on: June 28, 2017, 09:34:37 am »

It's well known they were never out of touch. Shagging her right before the wedding and then spending ages on the phone to her on the honeymoon.. How he expected any woman to accept that is beyond me. And Camzilla dictating baby plans to him and him following suit is one of the vilest and most disgusting things. It's reasonable to say that she was jealous and didn't want Di to have anymore kids with Chuck. If Camilla was so hurt & devastated by Andrew PB affairs as claimed by Junor (which I don't doubt is true), then why did she do the same to another woman, a young woman barely out of her teens?
Logged
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 36261


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #210 on: June 28, 2017, 10:25:06 am »

^Amazing; a mistress telling a prince how many heirs he is allowed to have. He could have given Diana a houseful of children to occupy her time, but instead only gave her two and left her in an empty nursery by the time she was thirty. Usually princes worked hard to have at least two healthy children, but here was Charles who had a wife who could produce healthy children by the dozen, but refused. If Diana had had one kid each year of her twenties (as she supposedly wanted) then she would have ended up occupied with her children and then happy enough with work and family. As a result of Camilla's meddling, there are no viable heirs to replace the two idiot princes.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6848


« Reply #211 on: June 28, 2017, 03:10:10 pm »

Alexandra had a philandering husband but he did not leave her bed after he got his heir and spare. She had some intimacy with him and they had a houseload of children. His mistresses did not even dare say one bad word about the royal wife nor dared tell him how many babies the wife should have. Though what Edward VII did was gross, he did not let a mistress oust the wife.  Camilla is an absolute disgrace and Charles is a *fool*.
Logged
jackiew
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 215



« Reply #212 on: June 28, 2017, 03:38:11 pm »

^ITA  thumbsup Charles is not only a fool but a weakling of a man.
Logged
Kuei Fei
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 36261


Moderator/I'm so royal I piss blue


WWW
« Reply #213 on: June 29, 2017, 01:00:46 am »

I he had kept Diana pregnant regularly, he would have had a houseful of heirs, Diana would have been too busy with them, and all in all he would have had an active family life. Win-win and I am certain that Camilla wouldn't have destroyed the monarchy in the way that she has. Diana would have been too busy with children and her other issues would have been kept at bay and she would have been more stable. With as many kids, divorce would have been out the window.
Logged

To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
Tatiana
Countess
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1730


I come from a long line of Monarchists.


« Reply #214 on: June 30, 2017, 11:46:12 pm »

  Kuei ,

   Diana was not a breeding rabbit.  Diana was not unstable, even Dr Khan said that.   Kate-Horror-Queen

   Charles started going fox hunting when Diana was pregnant with William,  having more pregnancies would have changed what exactly. ?
   
   Diana had duties to perform as Princess of Wales. 

   Charles has always been a weak and pathetic ditherer, having more children wouldn't have made him otherwise.
Logged

sandy
Princess
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6848


« Reply #215 on: July 01, 2017, 12:41:05 am »

Camilla probably ordered CHarles not to have more children. Which is why CHarles was so disappointed the second one was not a daughter. He knew he was going to ditch Diana and refuse her more children.
Logged
leogirl
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3195


« Reply #216 on: July 03, 2017, 03:08:29 am »

^^ I think it's more about Camilla's influence. Charles and Diana should have worked on their marriage. They could have probably found more things in common if they spent more time together, made an effort to try things that the other person enjoyed even if it wasn't their favorite activity. Camilla should not have been in charge of how many kids they had: not her marriage, not her place. Maybe #3 would have been a daughter and Charles could have had the daughter he wanted and Diana could have had another kid. No guarantee of a pregnancy every year, Diana had a miscarriage between William and Harry and I know a couple that wanted 12 kids but only had four (and they married young too). But a mistress should not have a say in another family's size, nor tell a man to leave his wife's bed.  thumbsdown
« Last Edit: July 03, 2017, 03:10:11 am by leogirl » Logged
Ariel
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2196



« Reply #217 on: July 03, 2017, 07:14:17 am »

from what I read Camilla was in charge of pretty much everything.
Logged
Little light
Baroness
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 940



« Reply #218 on: July 03, 2017, 07:08:04 pm »

^^

She had a miscarriage? I never knew that. Can I ask how you know please? I'm really curious.

Thanks thankyou
Logged
HRHOlya
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2158



« Reply #219 on: July 03, 2017, 08:30:34 pm »

^ One summer (or autumn? winter? no idea tbh, I think autumnish) they were up in Scotland and Diana went down to London (don't remember either anymore whether that was planned or not, but think not) and went to her gynaecologist, and then back up to Scotland or so and the wide assumption is that at the time she had a miscarrage because all of the circumstances allude to pretty much that. I don't remember the details of it (as you can clearly see), but this is the gist of it. If you google "diana miscarriage" I'm sure many sites will come up with the gossip from the time and people's opinion etc, but everyone is pretty much convinced she had a miscarriage!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!