Royal Gossip
June 26, 2017, 11:28:17 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Edward & Sophie losing security.  (Read 16152 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thtregoddess11
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 200



WWW
« Reply #40 on: April 11, 2012, 09:27:05 am »

SOPHIE UPSET AS BODYGUARD AXED

http://www.express.co.uk/ourcomments/view/283356/Adam-Helliker

thought that Bea&Eugenie didn't have bodyguards anymore?

At this time, only Sophie's were axed. IMO, if you're a WORKING royal or dependent of one, you deserve it. Otherwise, no. Sophie did roughly 300 engagements on HM's behalf last year, both at home and abroad, solo and with her husband, and Beatrice & Eugenie?

Let me see...barely passing uni...falling out of London clubs in the wee hours of the morning...smiling at events that all of the BRF show up at...acting like high priced socialites at Paris Fashion Week (Princess Beatrice's security to another attending Princess who tried to introduce herself: "The Princess does not wish to meet other princesses":rollseyes:)...nope....no official royal duties there....

They recently (well, Beatrice anyway, Eugenie's losing hers after graduation) lost theirs too-but Daddy's paying from his civil list $$ for them to have former/retired guards come back {Source}, so technically, the tax payers are still footing the bill for it!
Logged

June
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3700


« Reply #41 on: April 11, 2012, 09:33:22 am »

Prior to her relationship with Edward what she did was her own business.

Kate modelled underwear to snare a prince - she goes on official duties wearing no underwear and wears dresses so that we can see that - hardly the image of a future Queen.  She sets out to show us her altogether while Sophie has been a model of propriety since being with Edward -there is a difference.

I absolutely agree.  thumbsup And let's now add the vulgar display when she was with the Queen.  bignono Kate's clothes have always been for the benefit of men: skimpy, tight, revealing. Her jeans must have been so uncomfortable, always showing Will what awaited him behind closed doors.  ick
Logged
thtregoddess11
courtier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 200



WWW
« Reply #42 on: April 11, 2012, 09:37:42 am »

Prior to her relationship with Edward what she did was her own business.

Kate modelled underwear to snare a prince - she goes on official duties wearing no underwear and wears dresses so that we can see that - hardly the image of a future Queen.  She sets out to show us her altogether while Sophie has been a model of propriety since being with Edward -there is a difference.

I absolutely agree.  thumbsup And let's now add the vulgar display when she was with the Queen.  bignono Kate's clothes have always been for the benefit of men: skimpy, tight, revealing. Her jeans must have been so uncomfortable, always showing Will what awaited him behind closed doors.  ick

I couldn't agree with you more.
Logged

June
Duchess
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3700


« Reply #43 on: April 11, 2012, 09:43:46 am »

Once again: thankyou
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!