Royal Gossip
December 06, 2016, 05:52:23 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 05:46:34 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by windsor2
There's no proof as in pictures but as stated, the question came up at KP. The only thing that'll make sense is that this is to show that Jason isn't experienced enough to deal with being the communications director for the royals as now it looks like he's a liar after assuring the press that Harry wasn't going to see Meghan. He has to go regardless because he seems too busy being Harry and Wills mates instead of some one who drum into their heads that his job isn't to lie to the press about them to the extent that it's beyond fiction.
This is so out of character of Harry because this will hurt the queen and Charles that he's gone off and thrown KP in a tizzy and overshadowed the tour that he was on on behalf of the queen.  dontknow

 2 
 on: Today at 05:43:42 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by YooperModerator
^What's the deal with these invitations?  Does this mean that they'll actually show up?  Or is it just an announcement that they've been invited.  It'll be interesting to see if Kate shows up, for me.

 3 
 on: Today at 05:36:31 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by YooperModerator
Hold on.  Do we have any actual proof that Harry did this or is this an article of supposition of "this is what should happen and how much it costs and so on"?  I'm not reading anything that confirms this.  It would be pretty much impossible for Harry to go without being noticed from even London,  let alone Guyana, straight to Toronto and nobody sees him?  Nobody?   And for what?  Two-three days?  It seems too unbelievable.  But, IF true, pony up, buddy, for the entire cost and the media should hammer him mercilessly about this one.  If he can dish it out, he'd better learn to take it if he's going to be this foolish and wasteful.  I'm still questioning the veracity of this story, tho.

Fly, the December 14, 2016 was on the Royal Diary or CC but it's now gone.  I swear!  Something to do with the guards.  Shoulda taken a screen shot.  I'll say this much, every time I go there I see just how much the Princess Royal/Anne does.  So under-reported.  The rest, except for HM look like complete losers/slackers by comparison and I hope she kicks royal butt whenever she sees any of them whining or complaining.  Ok, back on topic.

 4 
 on: Today at 05:36:21 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by Rosella
A new engagement for Harry and the Cambridges on December 19th. The next day is the BP Christmas lunch for the extended family, hosted by the Queen.

https://mobile.twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/806176624320331777?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

 5 
 on: Today at 05:36:00 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by Fly on the wall
Kensington Palace ‏@KensingtonRoyal
The Duke, Duchess, Prince Harry and @heads_together have been invited to join @TheMixUK Volunteer Christmas Party on 19 Dec.

 6 
 on: Today at 05:28:57 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by Ariel
after Vegas people stood by him, now - I don't thing there will be anyone from the "internet trolls" nor the "intrusive media" to back him up.

 7 
 on: Today at 05:02:05 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by windsor2
Oh, this is much worse than Vegas. He lied. KP let it known that he wasn't going to see her anytime prior or after the tour but there he is going off to see her. He's thrown everything in a tizzy because of this. He shouldn't be told off. He should be kicked out on his arse. There's no going back now. He's going to face the press on his first public engagement tomorrow and all they're going to want to talk about is him lying to the palace about her. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he comes back with her and tell the palace that he married her. KF, I've got to hand it to you because you called him out a while ago. It's just a bit much to believe that he's worse than his brother as he's very reckless. First the end of a political dynasty, the Clinton's, and now the end of the monarchy as their shining bright star who was the bridge between the palace and the people is really just a selfish unemployed boy who wants what he wants when he wants it.

 8 
 on: Today at 04:53:29 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by Rebecca
Prince Harry's Meghan Markle detour came AFTER Kensington Palace denied he would see her
PRINCE Harry's dash to see his girlfriend Meghan Markle in Toronto came despite Kensington Palace's insistence that he would not be seeing her en route to or from the Caribbean tour.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/740432/Prince-Harry-detour-Meghan-Markle-Toronto-Kensington-Palace-denial



Well at least he paid for the flight to Toronto. He must be really feeling Meghan to do this



The Prince will fund the extra cost himself, although his police bodyguards' costs will be paid for by taxpayers.

Quote
Combining a taxpayer-funded flight home from an official visit representing the Queen with a trip to see his girlfriend also appears to be in breach of assurances given to the National Audit Office by the Royal Household in 2004 during an investigation into Prince Andrew's travel.

There was a user who use to post here and say just watch Harry will turn into the next Andrew .looks like Harry might just be



^^Harry has an event on Dec. 14 in London as well, doesn't he, fly?


Don't know .

He must be really stupid to do this.....  I really don't even care anymore at this point, but how can he not see that he is looking like a total fool here and is being soooooo played??

 9 
 on: Today at 04:50:30 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by Mandosiel
Somebody will definitely be hearing it when he gets home if he isn't already. This is as bad as Vegas all over again. sigh

 10 
 on: Today at 04:47:33 pm 
Started by dianab - Last post by Mandosiel
Rodean looks right from what I can see. Crap I didn't interpret that right....what womans uni/college is AS GOOD AS Oxford but still exclusively female? Oxford was shown to represent level of academia it holds itself to not Oxford the city itself hence why I saw only the Radcliffe(?) building and then immediately after the all female campus, level of academia not city stupid. easter-James Mary something I think so something like St.Mary or something like that just Mary. dontknow

I've no idea about college's in UK besides Leeds Uni, Cambridge and Oxford. I'm certain it was a womans college though no mistaking that. dontknow

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!