Royal Gossip
March 23, 2018, 04:46:05 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
 on: Today at 04:44:41 pm 
Started by deGuernsey - Last post by Little light

Why is George called PGTips please?

I don’t get it. Mike Jr, sure, as he’s his double, but not PGTips.

Thank you

 on: Today at 04:02:30 pm 
Started by deGuernsey - Last post by Val
*nasty* pandy for P Andrew
The Loser for James Mid
Betty for QE

 on: Today at 03:49:40 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by sandy
It makes me laugh at the sycophantic comments that the woman "never put a foot wrong."

 on: Today at 03:46:36 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by sandy
I would not say "all" the public "loathes her." As I said before, some may not care and some may just want a royal wedding (no matter who is involved) and the public will have two royal weddings this year. Some may enjoy the hype and some may collect those royal wedding souvenirs.

 I would not put Class and Camilla in the same sentence, KF but that's for another thread. Harry made the decision to marry Meghan as his fellow royals made their choices. Harry is not exactly someone to write home about. I don't buy into the royals being "superior beings" based on my observations of their not so savory behavior (by some of them) and embarrassing incidents. There to me is no such thing as a Golden Prince of the UK.

 on: Today at 03:45:55 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by YooperModerator
Another wrap coat?  Really?  Still allergic to a comb, I see and, overall she looks shredded/stressed and older than her years.  Harry no better and unpolished.   Straight outta bed look continues.   eating cookies

 on: Today at 03:41:58 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by gingerboy24
She has many photos that show her true colours

Not sure wearing kanickers here

Let us not forget Bhutan War Memorial  -  talk about a lack of respect for memorial and country  -  and this is the alleged future queen consort of the United Kingdom  ick ick

Can´t find the piccie but there is one on here somewhere with council cath falling out of a taxi showing her naked crotch full front  -  forerunner for the infamous photo when she went to NZ and flashed an infected crotch to the world, full frontal.

And this is with photoshopping the darker area for modesty under orders from the rf.

Yes, one classy, elegant lady oops, common as muck apology for a lady, council cath and lady should not be used in the same sentence.

 on: Today at 03:38:04 pm 
Started by Fly on the wall - Last post by HRHOlya
^ The worst was the leaked email on knighthood/ charity, such a fiasco, was a major scandal and PR damage for brand Beckham, also showed their true colours beautifully, sth people have said for ages was there for all to read with proof. Surprised Murkles is allowed and chose to wear a Beckham piece for her engagement photos and now again.. Together with the overpriced fugly Marchesa gown (which has a whiff of the Weinstein scandal; can't help but think of Weinstein whenever mentioning Marchesa), yikes! Double strike! ick

 on: Today at 03:17:31 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by Kuei Fei
The united front is why Kate and Meg are so eager to join; since joining, Kate's image has been brushed up and cleaned up and she's been protected from more than even Diana was. Meg is getting the same treatment, her mediocrity is being hidden and even though the public loathes her, she's going to get that ring. I do believe that there will be a shot at more coming out, but realistically I am certain that I'll enjoy watching the propaganda 'documentaries.'

Petulant Charles would never let HM snub her own grandson. HM is weak. And it's too late for her to stop the Megster. Ever since they let Waity in the RF has become a gutter family.

Definitely. Even Camilla is classier and was part of the gentry and has been kept firmly in her place. Kate however has dragged the RF into the gutter and Meg will drag the BRF into the sewer. I wonder how different things would be if William had kept Kate firmly out of his life after 2007 and had decided to just get her out once and for all. I believe his life would have been easier and I am certain that he would have easily adapted earlier to his life as a prince. Sick how he threw all that away.

 on: Today at 03:13:28 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by Kuei Fei
Amazing how ten years of being a beck/call girl and drunken party girl have been determinedly erased as if it never happened; the shameless dolt clearly has been cleaned up by the palace PR (at hefty expense no doubt) and I am certain that this is why Kate is so determinedly prim and proper and wears flouncy laces and ruffles. Throw in promoting early marriage/parenting and this is what she's determined to cover up. Thankfully we live in a digital age where it can't be easily erased.

I don't think Kate thought she would have to wait a decade to get that ring and didn't anticipate having to go out and get drunk at clubs on a regular basis. I also don't think she anticipated being called "Waity Katie" and struggle to get invited to places and didn't think her family would come under such scrutiny.

 on: Today at 03:00:48 pm 
Started by Alexandrine - Last post by Miss Hathaway
^^ It's not so odd . . . they have to keep up pretenses, after all.   Do you really think the Queen is going to make a public statement about what horrible women William and Harry have chosen?  Of course not.  Stiff upper lip, and all.   But she damns with faint praise. 

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!