Royal Gossip

The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Kate Middleton => Topic started by: Fly on the wall on February 09, 2017, 06:36:53 pm



Title: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Fly on the wall on February 09, 2017, 06:36:53 pm
Kensington Palace ‏@KensingtonRoyal 
The Duchess of Cambridge will visit two Action for Children projects supporting vulnerable families in Wales on 22 Feb.
This will be The Duchess's first engagements with @actnforchildren since becoming Patron.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: buflesse on February 22, 2017, 12:41:31 pm
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/11/3D85533300000578-4245822-image-m-16_1487763799443.jpg

Cringeworthy. Who curtsies like this nowadays. Waity loving it


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Alexandrine on February 22, 2017, 01:09:01 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4245822/Duchess-Cambridge-visits-children-s-charity-Wales.html

She still dresses like a twenty something.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on February 22, 2017, 01:21:56 pm
There were what - 9 people there?


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: deGuernsey on February 22, 2017, 01:26:47 pm
I see the bimbo is stuffing her bra again but this time not padding the bum. It reminds me of the you know what she's worn twice before :o in that the sizes of her non existent bum and tatas keeps changing sizes. I wonder if her tatas ever deflate when she bends over or moves the wrong way? Does the bum lose shape and move a tad sideways when she stands up from sitting in a chair? :laugh:  Gosh, she is disgusting. I am going to have to stop looking at pics of this bimbo so I stop seeing this stuff. Its gross. :ick: :bored: She really shouldn't be doing this at children's charities. Children are a lot more perceptive than she might think. :thumbsup: esp the young boys. :ick: Yes, I am going to boycott her pics for a long while.  I might haave less nightmares. .... ewww... gross.....


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Fly on the wall on February 22, 2017, 02:00:13 pm
@BBC WalesNews
When you get to cuddle the future queen...
https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCWalesNews/status/834396071862337540/video/1


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: YooperModerator on February 22, 2017, 02:00:58 pm
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/12/3D856AB000000578-4245822-Kate_s_hair_was_styled_in_a_half_up_do-a-53_1487766325320.jpg (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/12/3D856AB000000578-4245822-Kate_s_hair_was_styled_in_a_half_up_do-a-53_1487766325320.jpg)

 :stop:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Rosella on February 22, 2017, 02:34:15 pm
I see we've got the detachable jaw thing going again. In one of those photos Kate looks like a boa constrictor that's just gulped down a delicious rat. And her skirt is far too short IMO for visiting kiddiewinks. If she bends over too much to speak to them those behind are going to see a lot more of Kate's tights than they need to.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on February 22, 2017, 03:10:37 pm
^^ Several photos like that, where the wind makes that skirt look like a second skin.  I read on another blog that if not for the thick tights there would have been another flash gate, no idea what that news came from, must have been someone on the ground.


^^^ That Twitter vid  -  you can see she was uncomfortable having the "hugs" - lasted 2 seconds flat, after that must not have realised camera still rolling, face dropped, boredom set in and that was it.

Scathing remarks on DM.  Below is one of the kinder ones.  That suit, one commenter said she is not just wearing a suit from 5 years ago, but she is thinner than ever and the suit is hideous on her, let alone the style fit for a cheer leader in her early teens.  Another comment was how bored she looked, how ill put together the outfit was, how inappropriate for the occasion, burn the boots, recylcle the suit to a homeless bin, and that is all the tip of the iceberg.

She does look bored and fed up, if that hair do cost 300 GBP then whoever did it is getting money for old rope, the hair looks lank, boring and unsuitble.  Many questioning the jaw hang.  I notice she has been heavily photoshopped, so the real deal must have been bad.  Many comments on how few people turned out, crowd practically non existent.

To me she looked as though she woke up late, fell out of bed, threw on the first thing to hand and off she went thinkinkg what the h*ll, don´t want to go anyway, what they see is what they get, don´t like it, tough luck.

denisebiddy
If Kate were to be judged by her outfits, then I'd hazard a guess that she's immature for her age, is desperate to show off how thin she is, and is not very regal in manner. It all just smacks of informality and looks like stuff that you might wear to your first job in your early twenties.



My question is this  -  why on earth does HM allow this charade to continue, it is not improving, nothing about it is improving, in fact it gets worse all the time.  Her outfits are hideous, her face looks as though she is "medicated", she always looks as though she doesn´t want to be there, the list is endless.  HM knows the score, what is she dragging her heels for.  I would imagine she was unimpressed looking at the pix from today, yet still she will allow it to continue.   

Poor charity, used to royalty turning up and they get the meddleton sink estate slapper instead, a real big slap in the face for them. That ra ra skirt looks shorter than anything else she has worn in years, I shake my head in disgust and amazement that the rf are hanging on to this thing is all I can say.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Spitfire on February 22, 2017, 03:23:29 pm
^ She really didn't like those little girls hugging her, did she?  Her false bonhomie towards them was dropped as soon as possible and it was good to see her play-acting caught on camera.

Her outfit is horrible!  It looks as if she has dug out her old hockey skirt, which is far too short for a windy day in Wales, from the back of her wardrobe.  Fortunately, she was wearing thick tights otherwise and when the wind blew, the residents would have been given another Royal Flash.  And how much longer is she going to wear those shabby and scuffed suede boots?  She looks a complete mess and, IMO, that clothing tells us her opinion of this visit - it wasn't a red carpet bash with the film stars, so why bother to look smart?


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: YooperModerator on February 22, 2017, 03:57:13 pm
^Everything's wrong with her unpolished and inappropriate attire.  Maybe a small nod to the color but that's blown away by every other aspect of this mess.  What an insult to those she is supporting and meeting.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 22, 2017, 04:09:24 pm
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/11/3D85533300000578-4245822-image-m-16_1487763799443.jpg

Cringeworthy. Who curtsies like this nowadays. Waity loving it

That woman wasn't curtsying; she was sitting on sidewalk, I suppose, to be at same height as the boy.  Kate leaned over to shake her hand.

This is just about the worst I have ever seen Kate look.  The outfit -- horrible!  The hair -- messy.  The boots -- nasty looking.  Her personality -- non-existent.

It's time for the RF to kick her out.   If William wants to go with her, that's fine.  She is a disaster.

Unless . . . maybe she IS being kicked out and that's why she isn't even trying anymore????   Hmmmm . .  . . .  :bored:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Stephanie on February 22, 2017, 05:29:15 pm
Waity touching her vadge.
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-mist-a-child-and-adolescent-picture-id643721210?s=594x594
And her butt.
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-caerphilly-family-intervention-picture-id643739388?s=594x594


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Val on February 22, 2017, 06:03:07 pm
^

Another poor chap looking as if he is about to be swallowed by that protruding pelican like underbite.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Little light on February 22, 2017, 06:19:59 pm
^^
At the merest glimpse of a uniform, her hands swing into action like a reflex.

No. That's not quite true. At the merest glimpse of the opposite sex, regardless of age, off she goes like Pavlov's dogs!

She has no class. That's why I don't like her. And the fact she's bone idle.



Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: HRHOlya on February 22, 2017, 06:58:30 pm
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-caerphilly-family-intervention-picture-id643741434?s=594x594

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/11/3D8559A500000578-4245822-image-m-3_1487763585505.jpg

Knife knees Scarole passed on her knife kness to her daughter

http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wenn31051413-745x1024.jpg

http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wenn31051326.jpg

The knife knees were so hard at work, that her tights were quite crumpled in the knee area.

The outfit is really bad, highly unprofessional. Skirt way too short and boots too casual. At her age to dress so inapropriately and casually. D at that age had her professional down pat, wearing wonderful suits and apropriate shoes.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: india on February 22, 2017, 08:09:53 pm
^^^^Can this escapee from a mental institution go anywhere without touching her private parts?!?!?!!!!!!???? Will someone PLEASE put a net over its head and drag her out of the public eye!!! This has got to stop!!!


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: CathyJane on February 22, 2017, 08:12:15 pm
@BBC WalesNews
When you get to cuddle the future queen...
https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCWalesNews/status/834396071862337540/video/1

She really doesn't like kids touching her, does she?   :thumbsdown:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: CathyJane on February 22, 2017, 08:17:26 pm
Waity touching her vadge.
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-mist-a-child-and-adolescent-picture-id643721210?s=594x594
And her butt.
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-caerphilly-family-intervention-picture-id643739388?s=594x594

Always.  :bat:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Lady Bucklebury-Bucket on February 22, 2017, 08:30:51 pm
The job is far too big for her and she definitely knows it now, how unsuitable she is and always was.

She's absolutely hopeless. It's well known windy weather was forecast, so what does she wear? A flipping ra ra skirt ready to show the next week's washing at any moment.

She's visibly cringing when that poor little girl hugs her, couldn't look more awkward and embarrassed if she tried.

She's relishing that cringeworthy curtsey.

Gurning and grinning like an utter lunatic, I'm embarrassed for her.

Hair looks a mess, again windy weather, tie it back!

It would have been far better if she'd been made to work and see something of the world other than Mustique before she married, then she might not have appeared so inept at each engagement she's forced to undertake but the cat's out of the bag now, Waity is a dud.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 22, 2017, 08:58:44 pm
You know, she's taken the RF for a real ride, hasn't she? After all, she put up a front that she would work after being married during her twenties (when there was no guarantee of an engagement) and then she promised all sorts of things during the engagement interview, then put off work all the more. The woman has done nothing to commend her and frankly just not working at all was a huge mooch since she basically pushed William to take care of her. She placed herself on his hands and he LET her be carried into his life. She made all sorts of promises and she then took gross advantage of him and his generosity.

The RF didn't just let her on track, she led William up the water-path and frankly she's no different from any rookie who puts up a front and then basically let the mentor down and served the mentor up on a silver plate. She would be NOTHING without William and now she's discarding him now that the situation has become too 'real.' Look at how she let William go  to the palace after that nude scandal and retreated back to Berkshire.

Its a relief that no one is fooled into thinking that she actually wants to be there, or that she's good with kids, or even likes them. No one thinks she does this out of her heart or to find fulfillment, but to basically fulfill a pre-vacation quota. Her genuine interests are now out of the bag and she can no longer front that she gives a rat's behind about charity and no one thinks she actually wants to make an effort to engage people and get along with them.

Duchess Kate repeats a burgundy Paule Ka suit: too girlish or just fine?
http://www.celebitchy.com/524932/duchess_kate_repeats_a_burgundy_paule_ka_suit_too_girlish_or_just_fine/

http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-visits-caerphilly-family-intervention-picture-id643741434?s=594x594
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/11/3D8559A500000578-4245822-image-m-3_1487763585505.jpg

Knife knees Scarole passed on her knife kness to her daughter

http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wenn31051413-745x1024.jpg
http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wenn31051326.jpg

The knife knees were so hard at work, that her tights were quite crumpled in the knee area.
The outfit is really bad, highly unprofessional. Skirt way too short and boots too casual. At her age to dress so inapropriately and casually. D at that age had her professional down pat, wearing wonderful suits and apropriate shoes.

^^^^Can this escapee from a mental institution go anywhere without touching her private parts?!?!?!!!!!!???? Will someone PLEASE put a net over its head and drag her out of the public eye!!! This has got to stop!!!

Thing is, that she's so used to showing off her wares that it's an old habit that will take a long time to die out.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: livylivy on February 22, 2017, 09:31:24 pm
^ I agree!!
Again a childish look, that skirt is really too short!
She always looks so unprofessional, and that' s why she never had an actual job in her life before getting married, she never had to face the struggle of everyday life


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Lady Bucklebury-Bucket on February 22, 2017, 09:33:30 pm
It's ridiculous that she ever thought that outfit was remotely suitable.

Off the top of my head I can think of a couple of outfits of hers that would have been far better. It's not that difficult Waity.  :sigh:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on February 22, 2017, 10:29:58 pm
Her wardrobe choices directly reflect on the fact she's mentally and emotionally stunted.  There's really no grey area - she goes between schoolmarm and teenage girl.
I want to burn all of her clutches, her jeggings, her wedges, her suede boots, and her ugly arse hats.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on February 23, 2017, 08:48:44 am
What is it with those hideous black gloves?

http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wenn31051413-745x1024.jpg

For a start they are heavy and thick, they are too big for her, go well past the wrist and they look like something out of a horror movie.  She wears a barely there ra ra skirt, a short jacket, and then puts on heavy gloves, what on earth did she do that for. 

As for the hair, it looks awful, and if the taxpayers lashed out 300 GBP for that then we want a refund.  In an event, what about that hairdresser she has had around for yonks, she went to Bhutan with them, one of the trio of tarts she took with her.  If she is being paid as the hairdresser of council cath then why are we shelling out 300 GBP a pop for a hair do?  Doesn´t fit does it.

The "crowd" was practically non-existent, the way she h"hugged" those kids was ridiculous, couldn´t wait to get them off her, and then as she walked off and thought no cameras the looked miserable as sin, and had that "get me out of here fast" look.  As an alleged royal engagement with the charity for the first time she was a 100% dismal failure.  And to think of the money it costs to have the good for nothing go there, you could feed a family of our for a couple of months or more.  Outrageous and disgusting.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: livylivy on February 23, 2017, 09:44:42 am
 ^ lol Look how short that skirt is  lol


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: kolkomilko on February 23, 2017, 02:15:33 pm
^ I agree!!
Again a childish look, that skirt is really too short!
She always looks so unprofessional, and that' s why she never had an actual job in her life before getting married, she never had to face the struggle of everyday life

^ I do agree.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Glimmery on February 23, 2017, 03:11:10 pm
I'm not hugely into fashion but surely there was a more appropriate option available     :dontknow:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on February 23, 2017, 04:31:03 pm
^^  Look how enormous the hands look, man hands they are, huge and very unladylike, and tak about putting the arm out early. Streuth, she has no idea does she.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: memyselfandroyals on February 23, 2017, 04:56:13 pm
Her smiles reminds me a manic  bignono


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: HRHOlya on February 23, 2017, 08:31:48 pm
The Duchass wouldn't be *the duchass* if she wouldn't flash!

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/Kate-Middleton-Duchess-of-Cambridge-burgundy-dress-838715.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/22/12/3D857B6900000578-4245822-New_role_A_spokesperson_for_Kensington_Palace_said_in_a_tweet_on-m-52_1487766306859.jpg

http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-duchess-of-cambridge-arrives-for-a-visit-to-caerphilly-family-picture-id643716378

Can you imagine, Waity is announced, the princass, she comes and doesn't show off what she has? That would be a most disappointing visit, but luckily she never disappoints anyone!  :*butt*:  :kate-catwalk:
 :wellduh:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: livylivy on February 23, 2017, 09:15:43 pm
http://lookdavip.tgcom24.it/kate-middleton-gonna-corta-e-vento-birichino/#gallery/73668/kate-visita-un-centro-per-bambini-con-difficolta-emotive-e-comportamentali

Kate the serial flasher  :stop: No disappointment indeed

http://lookdavip.tgcom24.it/kate-middleton-gonna-corta-e-vento-birichino/#gallery/73671/kate-visita-un-centro-per-bambini-con-difficolta-emotive-e-comportamentali
Nearly flashing  :tehe:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: logically on February 23, 2017, 09:30:21 pm
I could have sworn the DM ran a picture early on when the skirt was swirling and lifting and you could clearly see the lining of the skirt and up her thighs.  Thank goodness there was a bit of lining


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Little light on February 23, 2017, 10:51:03 pm
And just think of all the photos the DM has taken today that didn't show off her lady bits.

It must be a hard job being editor when KM is out 'working'.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: CathyJane on February 24, 2017, 02:18:08 am
 I had a skirt like that when I was 12; I would still wear it when I was 22 but I didn't. She is a total loss.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: india on February 24, 2017, 08:20:14 am
Again, she needs to be hauled off. She is not fit to be let loose on the public.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 24, 2017, 08:44:47 am
Those kids are instinctively not trusting her; kids are able to sense this stuff and basically want to have nothing to do with her. I think she's clearly losing her mind.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: HRHOlya on February 24, 2017, 10:06:48 pm
>> Kate Middleton’s Masks

“Virtue has a veil, vice a mask.”
-Victor Hugo

Kate Middleton is a woman with multiple pairs of nearly identical court shoes and even more virtually indistinguishable masks she wears to her official engagements, casting them off and forgetting about them until she needs to show up in public again to convince the masses she is keen on doing whatever her Communications Secretary proclaims is close to her heart.

Tom Sykes wrote a piece recently in which he discussed growing disenchantment with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.  Sykes noted, “If William and Kate do slip up, the press, who have showed Olympian levels of restraint in their coverage of the royals in recent years, will eat them alive, so heavily built up is the resentment from a series of sleights, non-co-operation and attempts to cut them out of the picture.”

At Kate’s last two engagements on Wednesday for Action for Children, a patronage passed to her by the Queen, there was a curious lack of royal correspondents discussing the events on Twitter.  I wasn’t the only one who noticed.

Rebecca English from the Daily Mail was supposed to be there but had to cover an event at Clarence House instead because of a “childcare crisis” but overall the general Twitter hum generated by a Kate engagement was more of a ho-hum.

Kate wore a burgundy suit by Paule Ka which she first debuted in 2012.

Not only is the skirt surprisingly short for official engagements requiring a lot of crouching down, it looks surprisingly like my Christmas tree skirt that disappeared several years ago.  Now, I’m not accusing the designer of breaking into my home and raiding my holiday decorations, but it’s good to know there are replacements out there for it.  Quite frankly, it might be best covering the base of a tree because I noticed a number of photos with this happening on Kate.

Once dubbed a modern fairytale princess, Kate no longer draws crowds like she once did.

Comments on the Daily Mail article about Wednesday’s engagements made observations that Kate “seems like an empty soul” and “looks so insincere”.

Despite the usual photo props of cute children and lovely bouquets, all was not grins and roses.  BBC Wales News posted a video with the kind of kid hug footage that’s usually instant PR gold.

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/BBCWalesNews.png

Unfortunately, they missed the frames in which Kate was switching masks, like when Kate turned away from the cute cuddlers and made an annoyed face with her eyes shooting daggers.

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KateEyeDaggers.png

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KateEyeDaggerExpressions.png

And of course there was the face she made when she realized she would have to turn back to the adorable tykes to say goodbye and thank you.

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KateDisneyVillain.png

I’m not sure why becoming a Disney princess ranks highly for so many, but I guess I’m cool with it as long as becoming a Disney villain ranks lower.

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KateVillainExpression.png

If Kate can’t handle these mini bursts of engagements without being able to convincingly feign an appearance of not being resentful towards her duties, there’s little hope for the monarchy marathon.  Kate got her prince but it seems it never occurred to her that after her wedding she wouldn’t be able to disappear into the words “and they lived happily ever after”. <<

http://lovelolaheart.com/?p=3995

The pics are the best bit


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: livylivy on February 24, 2017, 11:24:28 pm
^  :thumbsup:
That one by Lola was such a great post  :cookie:!
I really love lovelola  :flower:!!


http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KateDisneyVillain.png
 :nervous: :nervous: :nervous: :nervous:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on February 25, 2017, 10:23:57 am
^ Defo a Disney villain  lol  Her face, either been crying all night or so puffed up with fillers, looks like a squirrel stashing away too many nuts in his cheeks, what a complete mess, head to toe.  Time they got rid of her, she really does get worse all the time. 


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Val on February 25, 2017, 04:33:06 pm
^

She looks very sly in that one but then I suppose she is.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on February 25, 2017, 05:41:20 pm
I think we can safely say she is a very sly person, appears to be in her nature.  You only see the real her when she thinks there are no cameras on her. As they say, the truth will always out.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 25, 2017, 11:33:41 pm
She's afraid of revealing her true self, no wonder she's either hiding or attacking the press. At least no one is under any illusions about her anymore. We saw her from the get-go, but now the wench is unable to hide herself and the public has to face the reality of their fairy-tale duchess.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Southern Belle on February 26, 2017, 12:25:22 am
What a ridiculous outfit!  Skirt like a cheerleader's and the color and fabric are so blah.  Nothing like the beautifully tailored suits and dresses Diana wore.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: CathyJane on February 27, 2017, 04:11:26 am
It's just disheartening to see all the opportunities she has squandered. A fine education and she's sounds like a moronic baby. I pity the kids that have to spend time with her.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on February 27, 2017, 04:17:16 am
^ She's completely out of her element and she knows it.  She probably knows that everyone else thinks so too.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 27, 2017, 06:40:38 am
It's just disheartening to see all the opportunities she has squandered. A fine education and she's sounds like a moronic baby.

Universities NEED to up their admissions criteria and need to make a solid stable work history as part of the admissions process. Chrissake she had no business being in school and neither did William. If universities want to be taken seriously again, something new must be done.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: HRHOlya on March 03, 2017, 11:00:18 pm
A Waity Flashbridge classic
http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/wenn31053001.jpg


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: india on March 04, 2017, 04:57:01 am
Just look at the hideous old filler inflated face of a hag grinning as she exposes herself. She is DISGUSTING.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Val on March 04, 2017, 08:12:59 am
^

It was was well known some years ago that the universities in the UK would take anyone as it boosted their income from the government.  Teachers had to ajust their reports to universities  to only reflect the positives in a student or at least use general non negative phrases.  In my college any negative reports were sent back by the Principle to be rewritten.


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on March 04, 2017, 11:46:44 am
Well, we knew she cheated, and what you have just said is par for the course.  Basically any village idiot with money can get a degree, they are not worth the paper they are written on. We also know bill medd cheated and had one of his staff write up his essays-

^^^ Good find that photo, we knew there had to be one like that, windy day, mega short skirt, what a *lowlife* she is, a true 100% exhibitionist of her body, in regions we have had no desire to see but sadly got pushed into our faces.

What is it with bill medd, how many men would want to be out and about with a wife, in such a public situation, and know that virtually everyone there had seen all the private parts of council cath  -  nothing let out  -  naked infected crotch full frontal head on, her naked butt, her naked boobs (such as they are, more like fried eggs).  And he stands there, looking totally gormless and thinking we should all this they are both wonderful.  Not to mention the many shots we have had of his odd weeny, and in front of kids too. That camel toe very evident.  My husband would not be going out of the door showing his wares that much I can tell you, and for an alleged royal, in such a public position, off the both trot showing their private parts to one and all.

Those two are both disgusting, HM really is weak keeping them on.  I know many say she wants to end her reign on a high, but they have taken her to gutter level already, how much lower does she want to go is the burning question.  She looks an utter and complete fool for doing nothing about it.  Too late now, so few people turn up at their engagements it is an embarrassment, even the oldies don´t want to be bussed in any more, not even for a lovely cream tea.

Wonder what other piccies there are of council cath at this event that haven´t surfaced.  Surely there was a photographer behind her, he must have had an eyeful. Can´t resist flashing can she, if if only to the poor little chidren she goes to see.  Council caro spawned three vile sprogs, and trained them in such vile and disgusting ways she should be hung, drawn and quartered. 


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: Stephanie on March 07, 2017, 10:15:17 am
http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/wenn31052993.jpg :stop: :stop:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: gingerboy24 on March 07, 2017, 11:27:22 am
^Bet the person behind her had a right eyeful  :ick: :ick:


Title: Re: Action for Children February 22
Post by: india on March 07, 2017, 02:52:06 pm
^^She looks like a creepy pervert who has escaped from a mental institution and is about to pounce on some poor unsuspecting soul.