Royal Gossip

The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Duke William & Duchess Kate of Cambridge => Topic started by: Alexandrine on January 01, 2017, 09:55:04 am



Title: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Alexandrine on January 01, 2017, 09:55:04 am
 :flower:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 01, 2017, 04:52:47 pm
WEll, the Cambs have seen in the New Year with HM losing her good health, ignoring his duties, shunning his family, and officially showing he prefers to be with the mooching Middletons rather than his flesh and blood family, especially after Zara lost her child right before Christmas.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on January 01, 2017, 05:11:15 pm
Tells you a lot about the vile critter doesn´t it.  Could care less about nobody but himself and what he wants, every time. They should kick him out of the rf and take all her perks/luxuries away from him, he is so undeserving it is untrue.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on January 01, 2017, 09:59:05 pm
It's amazing to me that no one has called him on his horrible spoiled brat behavior.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on January 01, 2017, 10:15:48 pm
Several people suggested that he had been totally brainwashed by the Medds as if in a cult.  His appalling behaviour can only support that suggestion.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on January 01, 2017, 10:19:36 pm
^I have heard the same thing. He is so stupid and so easily manipulated by the slithering one that it was a piece of cake to wrest control of his inadequate mind. It's time for him to be hauled off to that mental institution. And then for TPTB to swing into action against the treasonous Middletons.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on January 01, 2017, 10:28:14 pm
^

One thing for absolute certainty is that he is not King material.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on January 01, 2017, 10:42:22 pm
There is nothing kingly about his petulant a$$.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on January 01, 2017, 11:47:52 pm
I think PC should be the last king. PW clearly doesn't want the throne, and seems to dislike the public/press and the royal family with great intensity.  :-X


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 02, 2017, 12:01:07 am
After all the horrible damage that the ducal couple have done, there really is no other way. When a Labor Prime minister arrives, he/she will be forced to clean up the mess that the Windsors have made and certainly, it can't be fixed. The ducal couple isn't functional and at this point in time, the Windsors have done too much damage to the nation's prestige. At some point an accounting has to be made of where money is going and it's ironic that Kate has destroyed the very family that she wanted so desperately to be a part of; she destroyed the man she was desperate to marry and be Queen Consort of. How on earth can the Windsors possibly get back on any kind of track and it's likely become burdensome for politicians to cover up the messes that the Windsors get in. The monarchy is just an added expense that doesn't do anything, not even maintain the palaces that are a part of the nation's heritage. There really is no way forward. Harry is useless too and the Yorkies are too controlled by their mother.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on January 02, 2017, 12:36:06 am
There is always Edward's and Anne's children. Lady Louise is a replica of the queen. Give it to her. Sophie and Edward would love it. And they would probably groom her properly.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 04, 2017, 05:32:53 pm
What jolts me the most is how William is clearly in horrible pain and Kate doesn't care or encourage him to get real help. She's taking FULL advantage and it's clear that to her, this is just one big circle jerk for her family. She's full of misery, but she threw herself at this and cut him off from his support network.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on January 14, 2017, 02:05:14 pm
Why Prince William and Kate Middleton Have A Work Problem

Kate Middleton made her first public appearance along with her husband Prince William on Wednesday, and the British media were quite breathless in their reporting of the event.
Kate and Will, it was reported, had gone back to their “work” of public engagements much earlier in the year than is usual for the royals, and this was a sign of their newfound commitment to their roles as full time royals, a sign of the increased “support” they would be offering the queen after her bout of ill-health at Christmas “focused minds” on the issue.
While it’s quite true that Kate and Will do seem to have decided to forego their annual January jaunt with the Middletons to Mustique this year (although this might have more to do with George’s playschool schedule that any puritanical restraint) the idea that going back to work on Jan. 11 constitutes really putting your back into it is laughable. The fact they did not make a public appearance until Feb. 7 last year doesn’t change that fact.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/14/why-prince-william-and-kate-middleton-have-a-work-problem.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: cate1949 on January 14, 2017, 02:38:34 pm
Sykes used to be a total W and K sugar - but that is pretty hard hitting column.  Jason must have ticked Sykes off!  LOL

They cannot keep ignoring this.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Little light on January 14, 2017, 02:39:29 pm
Good for them in calling them out for their lack of work ethic.   :thumbsup:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 14, 2017, 05:38:11 pm
Sykes used to be a total W and K sugar -
but that is pretty hard hitting column.  Jason must have ticked Sykes off!  LOL
They cannot keep ignoring this.

This has to be the most honest thing people have said about Kate "That she married into." It's not suggesting that she needs more time or didn't think that public appearances were something previously hidden from her. I am fed up with the excuses that she needs to adjust to anything, since the day she was born, she was a subject of HM and she was singing and making oaths of obedience to HM/BRF. She knew from birth how things were and that the BRF did appearances and did a lot of charity work. She was immersed in that knowledge since she was aware of class distinctions. She chased this and she should own up and she should just do her job and stop this childishness. Plenty of time to jet around, plenty of time to pick fights with people and destroy careers, and so she has no business suing the press and destroying careers and basically trashing a system that has been in place for thousands of years.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on January 20, 2017, 06:32:56 pm
Kensington Palace ‏@KensingtonRoyal 
 Kensington Palace has issued an update about The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's plans for 2017
https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/822466351621144576


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on January 20, 2017, 08:17:13 pm
Reminds me of this, I posted it on another thread.  Should have put it on here really, sorry mods.

Found this on social media earlier, it did give ma a good chuckle.

The comment made was

"The enormity of what he has taken  on as a "full time royal" takes its toll on idle Willy

https://scontent-frt3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16142730_736076259877806_2583551220589639072_n.jpg?oh=27e8bec22774a9b2c02f1e1e2e395acc&oe=591B2DBE



Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 21, 2017, 01:39:25 am
If he had been spending time with his people and less time with the Midds, he would be settled into his role and would not at all be stressed out about it. It's not like he's where he wants to be (no surprise there that he isn't trusted with more prominent roles and authority) and it's not like Kate is any real help.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: windsor2 on January 24, 2017, 01:46:24 am
Kate could be banned from the Baftas over fears she 'will OUTSHINE A-list stars': Prince William 'locked in behind-the-scenes row over whether the Duchess of Cambridge should attend the awards ceremony'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4149976/Row-Kate-attend-BAFTA-ceremony.html#ixzz4WdcEEdtl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Rosella on January 24, 2017, 02:00:04 am
Kate outshine film stars, Kate outshine anyone, anywhere?  :laugh:  :laugh: In her dreams! When did Willie last turn up for these awards anyway? He's been MIA for two years at least in spite of being President of the organisation.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on January 24, 2017, 04:47:39 am
I think it's just an excuse to not be seen with Kate.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on January 24, 2017, 05:55:12 am
I don't think she'd outshine them either. The night is about the stars, not the royals. Kate will not be winning any awards that night.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 24, 2017, 07:20:02 am
Something is going on. You would think this would be the perfect place to debut Kate as a 'working' London based royal. It's not like Kate has anything better going on. It could well be that relations are so bad that neither can be around each other anymore and I do believe that this is the situation.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on January 24, 2017, 10:17:38 am
Maybe this is the beginning of waity being side-lined?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 24, 2017, 10:32:00 am
Realistically this could very well be just that.

Kate really can't be taken anywhere anymore. It's not like she is given much of a budget now and frankly I would not bet on Charles feeling generous after they both snubbed HM and the RF during the holidays. William might in fact *despise* her so much that he doesn't want her around. Taking her to the BAFTA is just asking for trouble since she'll be surrounded by endless men who are in their prime and looking their best while the womne will be jeweled and gowned and wearing huge jewels and that will trigger Kate's jealousy.

If he goes, but she doesn't, I am certain it will mean she's no longer going to be welcome at fun stuff.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on January 24, 2017, 11:09:41 am
Maybe he's trying to get rid of her because ge doesn't want her and maybe because a woman told him to...? :P


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on January 24, 2017, 06:38:23 pm
As in previous years he has generally not turned up why all the fuss anyway.  He should resign the position, he has missed at least two years of attending, and always looks boring mess when he has gone.  Council cath could never outshine the celebs, some very attractive, glamorous women in that lot, then you look at council cath, hmmm, no comparison, she is trailer trash unfortunately for her, whatever "it" is passed her by  -  no presence, no charisma, unattractive and masculine looking, anorexic, seen more fat on a matchstick.  Nah, leave her at home, best place for her, behind closed doors.



Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on January 24, 2017, 06:55:22 pm
At the mental health event today she looked like a bright green runner bean from the side.  Usual gurning, guffawing, hand waving and fake interest.  Yes GB best if she stays at home.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on January 24, 2017, 09:39:58 pm
^So few people at EACH today, only a few kids and they were probably bussed in.  Nobody interested in the lunatic.  Yes, I have seen a fatter green bean, she looks so skinny and frail, a wonderful candidate for severe osteoporosis if she makes it into old age, which at the rate she is going will not happen.  White wine and cigarettes and not exactly nutritional are they - or at least they weren´t when I last looked...


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 25, 2017, 02:05:05 am
I think neither can stand one another; I also think that if they went out in public together, there would be an explosion.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: windsor2 on January 28, 2017, 02:15:05 am
Pictured: William and Kate get £20,000 yew hedge to give their new palace home some privacy
Quote
The move, thought to be costing taxpayers more than £20,000, will block the view of anyone hoping to get a glimpse of the family.
It is not clear what their neighbours think of the barrier. That area of the grounds backs on to Kensington Palace Gardens, which is known as Billionaires’ Row and is regarded as the most expensive street in Britain, with houses worth up to £100 million.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4165886/William-Kate-20-000-hedge-privacy.html#ixzz4X1AJC7YI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

People are upset to say the least. They've even dragged harry into this mess and he has nothing to do with this.  :cookie:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on January 28, 2017, 02:18:19 am
Funny how these two nitwits are banging on about privacy and no one really cares to see them in the first place.  If 20 people show up at their engagements, that's allegedly a big turnout. :Kate: :William:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on January 28, 2017, 02:54:26 am
I think they have some sort of paranoia/victim mentality, as if everyone is out to get them. They could really use some help.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on January 28, 2017, 03:00:44 am
They're paranoid because they have a lot to hide and don't want to be found out.  The more skittish they become, the guiltier they look, IMO.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 28, 2017, 03:04:56 am
I think they have some sort of paranoia/victim mentality, as if everyone is out to
get them. They could really use some help.

Serious paranoia and a major persecution complex.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: kolkomilko on January 28, 2017, 08:42:31 am
^ Very serious paranoia, a maniac one. They think to be the centre of the world.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on January 28, 2017, 02:38:49 pm
^ I believe a lot  of this is KM. She knows all of the horrid, evil things she has done to people (including PW/BRF behind their backs) and knows she did wrong. She knows people will want to get back at her and also expose her crap so she must live in fear. I bet she and Scarol (e) feed PWs insecurity in order to protect themselves. They are just using PW as usual. The Midds are really trying to keep PW finding out all they did behind his back but when he finds out he is going to go ballistic and that includes the truth theyve hidden from him their shemanigams re the sprogs and etc. And the whole using PD and copying her etc is totally KM side it was part of her plan and not PW but he needs to stop allowing himself to be used like that and he needs to stop, think about it and wonder just why he agreed to go along with that shyt and why he doesn't just put a stop to it. And then he needs to stop thinking about it so much and just do it/stop this creepy insanity after all it isn't HIS obsession with his dead mum it's one of the Midds way to emotionally blackmaail himand use him. It's just SICK!!!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 28, 2017, 09:39:01 pm
This is totally on Kate, but not just for the reason you mentioned.

Kate seems determined to put up a front that she's in constant demand, like celebs who are trying to become in demand by first setting up a persona and going from there.

As for William putting a stop to her idiocy, good luck there. It's not like he had the spine to prosecute her for stalking him post-breakup and he lacked the spine to cut her out after she insulted his family numerous times. HE doesn't even get her under control when she acts out in public.

William is a doormat, a broken waste of a man. Kate takes full advantage and had a hand in creating William into a broken man.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Alexandrine on January 29, 2017, 09:10:38 pm
I think this is William. Kate would not mind doing Diana like pictures and videos with her children. She only does what he wants.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on January 29, 2017, 10:22:40 pm
Willy Boy's Obscenity is a hideous human being. For all the reasons stated above. She should be removed from the public eye and from the royal coffers. She is a toxic poison.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on January 30, 2017, 06:38:49 am
William won't let go; he won't let go because if he were to start over post-divorce, he would have to work horribly hard to get back to square one, not just smile at the cameras and be boyish. Kate would never leave him alone and she would be even worse post-divorce. He has placed himself in an unforgivable situation with his people and press and surely the aristocrats are seething mad at how he let the Middletons in. To say the least about how he let the press bash them relentlessly. I can't imagine any of the aristocratic women like having their reps smeared in the media. While he was flying high he gave the aristos and gentry the go-by and gave all the courtiers the middle finger and meanwhile, mouthed off about changing how things were done.

Both of them are ruined.

There is no way that either can really redeem themselves. Neither have any credibility and both have made it clear what they think of the public and press.

I give it a few more years until the press turn on them completely and are utterly open about it.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on January 30, 2017, 04:04:59 pm
^

There is so much to come out and it will.  Criminal acts, lies, deception etc etc and no one will escape.  QE is hanging on in there desperately hoping to end her reign in peace before it all goes pear shaped.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on January 30, 2017, 04:43:25 pm
^ Oh Val, laugh of the day, HM end her reign in peace?  Wishful thinking on her part.  Does she really think this situation can continue.  Council cath, bill medd and the medds en masse have done a wonderful job of making the British rf a world wide laughing stock.  The higher echelons in Saudi Arabia for are still using it all as a joke at diplomatic receptions et al, much gosspip about the sprogs too, that much I know for sure.  Gawd alone only knows what China thinks, as for India and Bhutan, after that disgusting visit there last year I can´t imagine what they are thinking.  Russia, well, thanks to press gossip from Russia we know what Putin thinks about the lamebridges and their private life.  End reign in peace  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: best joke of the year so far.  She would end it in peace if she despatched the lamebridges, medds and sprogs on a slow boat to somewhere never to return to British shores.  Unless and until HM does something about this very very dire situation she will never get any peace. The medds are evil, nasty, deceptive, lying good for nothings, the lot of them, including council cath.  Dream on HM, dream on.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 02, 2017, 02:07:15 pm
If HM had exposed the Middletons and dragged them through the courts, prosecuting them under every single law that the Midds broke, while letting William get fried in the world press while letting him get charged and convicted as an accessory, she would have the status of a living legend. Regrettably she lost the chance to teach that arrogant brat a lesson he would never forget. If HM had put her heels in and ordered a prenup to be signed and made it publicly known that the only reason the wedding wasn't going ahead is because Kate refused to sign a prenup and adhere to conditions, HM would be showing strength. HM will be ending her reign on a note of being pitied, not respected. HM has been protecting the Cambs and they've been taking full advantage.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on February 02, 2017, 04:12:33 pm
^Yes, she has been protecting and The Useless Pair have taken full advantage. They are disgusting.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 17, 2017, 12:07:11 am
I find it jolting how low William has come; just six, seven years ago he was riding high and this is what he's shown himself to be. Had it all laid out and now he threw it all away with both hands. He was going down with Kate, but the engagement and up to now has caused a horrendous drop in his PR stock. Will be the best way to have the truth unraveled, but I do believe that there isn't much of them left. You can see how both are coming apart.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on February 17, 2017, 12:20:43 am
I hope they come apart. I hope she has a breakdown and strips at a public event and starts humping every man in sight. Willy The Loser will be grinning exuberantly with his yellow ground down teeth in full display whirling Prince Brute around in the air whilst singing love songs to The Viper and The Viperette. It will be magnificent.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on February 17, 2017, 02:03:39 am
^^ KF it does appear PW is losing it. Have you seen the strange faces he has been giving as of late? And the way he sometimes stand... he seems to be acting rather peculiar. He may be buckling under thew strain. It's sad, really... thee man has enough external resources to kick the vile, loathsome bytch t the curb and a family who will most likely gladly help him but internally he may need to be rescued after all...  :o oh, shyt, I can't  believe I just said that! FFS!!! :o :-


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 17, 2017, 02:19:09 am
I often think that if William in fact runs mad, has some kind of psychotic episode, he would have to be hospitalized and Charles and the rest of the BRF would take over and then end up with the Midds dealt with. William is likely the only reason they haven't been ousted and I think that adds to his strain. It would be a huge blessing in disguise that he would be committed. The marriage could be dissolved on the grounds of insanity/mental illness (something that is in fact a legal and legitimate reason for the dissolution of marriage) and the Midds fixed once and for all. He would in fact end up with his bad PR fixed and it would end a lot of chaos in the RF.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on February 17, 2017, 02:21:22 am
^ I hear what you are saying but he doesn't need to do anything that drastic. And he could annul this farce ssince we all know this didn't start AFTER the "marriage" but years before.
Btw, what is the English/British equivalent of a bogan?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 17, 2017, 05:32:46 am
When my life was spiraling out of control, I checked myself into a psych ward; it was the BEST choice I ever made. A month in a mental ward will do much better than a divorce.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on February 17, 2017, 06:19:24 am
 ^ No disrespect meant  (and I hope you are well) but PWs stress is KM related. Getting rid of runty waity is one thing PW NEEDS as would any and every man in his position. It is unthinkable and absolutely inhumane to expect a man to marry let alone remain married to a woman he never wanted as his wife in the frst place. It is sick. Getting rid of Runt is just the beginning of PWs healing process but it is a major and completely necessary part of the process. It is also unthinkable that a woman can get and remain grasping goodies free to her and at everyone else's expense. Runt is not owed this and doesn't deserve this. End of. PW doesn't deserve this shyt. The people of the commonwealth deserve better than this shyt. It is the best for everyone involved and the most honest and honourable thing to do is annul this so-called "marriage" out the truth and the BRF can then begin to honour the British people as they deserve to be honoured and not lie to and steal their money and prestige and yes, I'll say it, the Brits glory. Everyday this filthy con goes on is another day the good people of UK and the commonwealth suffer indignities which are far, far beneath them and that p*sses me off. Enough has been enough already. Cleanly I am on PWs side of this.  :bat: Okay rant over. bignono kisss


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 18, 2017, 09:54:29 pm
No one made him marry her. HE could have broken up with her in 2010, but chose to become engaged to her instead; he wasn't forcibly betrothed, he wasn't at all forced to marry her to honor a trade/diplomatic treaty. It's not like he HAD to do anything with her he didn't want to. It's not like he had ot save Kate's honor and reputation, since both were shot to pieces long before he hooked up with her. All he had to do was walk away and live his own life.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on February 19, 2017, 03:31:39 am
For me, even after all this time they've been together they still don't seem like a couple.  It's an odd phenomenon.  The vibe just isn't there.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 19, 2017, 04:51:56 am
You're right; no matter how many years she is with him, she always strikes me as there temporarily and as a usurper, not someone who belongs there. For some reason, she's so oddly out of place, as if he being there has thrown the rest of the world out of joint. The press carries on lauding them as groundbreaking and amazing, but now the press is coming across as moronic idiots. It's very clear that this marriage isn't working and the entire hype is being called out by anyone who reads the DM now. She seems so out of place and it's clear that she simply does not belong and it's clear that William is in a way still waiting for her to take the first step of getting the heck out of his life. Yet, she keeps getting more enmeshed the more the RF tries to give her an exit. She could have left for good in 2007 (and it was clear that William was happier without her in his life) and it's clear that she didn't want to leave and it's obvious that she will never go along with a divorce mainly since she's too crazy to make her own way in the world (like Fergie).

She stays mainly because it is incomprehensible to her that there are places in this world where she truly does not belong. William keeps her around since he wants to be 'nice' all the time and basically refuses to man up and cut the wench out for good (as he should have in 2007) and it's just a mess. The two of them are a mess apart, but have been a walking disaster area as a married couple, taking a wrecking ball to so many lives.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on February 19, 2017, 02:55:35 pm
He just needs to unload this lunatic. Get rid of her. Lock her and her vile mother up.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on February 19, 2017, 03:00:27 pm
^ :thumbsup:  That's what I've been saying all along.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on February 21, 2017, 04:07:40 pm
The Daily Beast: Prince William & Kate are ‘very spoiled & indulged’

Quote
    Kate’s schedule following her appearance at the Air Cadets event on V-Day: “The next day the shutters went up, Kate and William retreated to Norfolk and, astonishingly, Kate only has three public appearances between now and that trip to France. The first is next Wednesday (February 22), when she will undertake her first engagement as the royal patron of Action for Children, visiting mental health projects for children in Wales. Kate has another engagement on the last day of February in London, opening the Ronald McDonald House at Evelina London Children’s Hospital. Aside from a church service on March 9, Kate will otherwise be out of public view until the Paris trip.”

    The Cambridges don’t want to give up their life in the country: “Despite extensive counsel to the contrary, it seems William and Kate are not yet ready to give up the leisured life they have for some years been enjoying with their ‘Turnip Toff’ landowning friends in the backwaters of Norfolk, a hundred miles from the capital and any serious, sustained press scrutiny. Their argument is that they are busy working behind the scenes, and raising their kids, and that making sure the next generation of royalty is as sane and balanced as possible is just as important work as cutting ribbons.”

    Sympathy is waning for Will & Kate, especially when they talk about how “hard” it is to be parents: As one well-informed British commentator who wished to remain anonymous told the Daily Beast: “Whenever he talks about how hard parenthood is you realize he has no idea how his choices come across.” The commentator says this is, “partly because no one dares tell him that doing so little looks pathetic; they surround themselves with yes people including staff and friends. They are very spoiled and indulged.”

    The journalists talk among themselves: “Certainly, the persistent chatter among the journalists who cover the royal beat is informed by constant disbelief of how little the Cambridges do, despite regular admonishments in the press… If William and Kate do slip up, the press, who have showed Olympian levels of restraint in their coverage of the royals in recent years, will eat them alive, so heavily built up is the resentment from a series of sleights, non-co-operation and attempts to cut them out of the picture.”

http://www.celebitchy.com/524669/the_daily_beast_prince_william_kate_are_very_spoiled_indulged/


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on March 06, 2017, 04:27:16 am
It's about that time of year where they sneak off to vacation.  Explains Harry being front and center in the press.  So where are they?  Skiing?  Having cosmetic procedures done?  Hiding out at Dingley Dell?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on March 06, 2017, 04:50:37 am
^

Yes same old MO and according to those close they have already had the sunshine holiday joining Ma medd around the time of her birthday.  Easy to flit off by private jet if only for a short while especially as they can now fly by helicopter between KP, Manson Towers and Anmer with no one sure where they are.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on March 17, 2017, 10:38:24 pm
Duchess Kate is ‘less than pleased’ about William’s Verbier shenanigans
http://www.celebitchy.com/528013/duchess_kate_is_less_than_pleased_about_williams_verbier_shenanigans/

^Yeah, like she has a right to go all moral; she won't have her feelings taken into consideration and she won't be able to really set rules since it's clear that while she ruled the roost for the first couple of years, it's clear that she won't be ruling it anymore. He is clearly rebelling against her and the Midds and I wager he'll continue to humiliate her. Thing is, she hasn't been a real wife, or a real mother and hasn't been a good consort; she hasn't held up her end of the marital bargain and now he's making it clear that she and her feelings mean nothing to him anymore.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on March 18, 2017, 05:13:02 am
It's about time but then The Super Dork is a little slow on the uptake.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on March 20, 2017, 08:44:15 pm
I am certain William will be more than eager to remind Kate about her past and that without him, she would be struggling big time to get a life for herself together. Just like Henry VIII reminded Anne Boleyn about how he wouldn't do it all over again for her if he had had a chance to do things differently. I do believe that there isn't any kind of time when he hasn't thrown it in her face on occasion and I think there isn't any love between them. Pity since he genuinely wanted a home life with a warm family of his own and wanted to have someone who basically was a real wife, mother, and companion. Instead he's stuck (again) being a support system for a fully adult woman and an ATM for his in-laws.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on March 20, 2017, 08:59:34 pm
I don't think kate cares the only thing she might be "pissed" about is that's it's out in public and what it looks like. the minute she tries to make a stink all William has to say you know who I was before you married me. So as long as William keeps things on the DL kate will be fine. Carole might be more pissed not at William but at kate for not keeping her man in line


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on March 21, 2017, 01:10:40 am
I don't think kate cares the only thing she might be "pissed" about is that's it's out in public and what it looks like. the minute she tries to make a stink all William has to say you know who I was before you married me. So as long as William keeps things on the DL kate will be fine. Carole might be more pissed not at William but at kate for not keeping her man in line
Funny thing is I have never considered PW to be KMs man and I doubt PW has either. :cookie:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on March 22, 2017, 02:39:36 am
Her parents bought her that marriage and thing is, that kind of thing lasts only so long as the money is flowing. Kate didn't realize that when you buy someone, you're buying the body, but you can't buy the heart. She doesn't have his heart, never did and never will. William never wanted to marry her, but she wouldn't let him go on in life and build a life for herself, she kept pushing her way in all the time, doing horrendous damage in the first place. She really threw a wrench into a lot of plans so many had for her and frankly I do believe that she has no business acting all outraged at anything.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on March 26, 2017, 04:24:10 pm
Kate Middleton and Prince William's love story: How they met, the REAL reason they split and their wedding
http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-feature/1010052/kate-middleton-prince-william-relationship-how-they-met-their-wedding-details-revealed


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on March 26, 2017, 08:56:05 pm
Had to laugh, bill medd not even on the helicopter, as we know he is so rarely at EAAA very little chance of this happening, and if you read the story it is a non event anyway.  Juggers really is scraping the bottom of the barrel.  Near miss  -  ha ha, how can it be that when he was not even on board   :laugh: :laugh:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4349456/Drone-hits-Prince-William-s-helicopter-near-miss.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on March 26, 2017, 09:01:57 pm
^ He was there in spirit!  :William: :laugh:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on March 26, 2017, 09:09:08 pm
Kate Middleton and Prince William's love story: How they met, the REAL reason they split and their wedding
http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-feature/1010052/kate-middleton-prince-william-relationship-how-they-met-their-wedding-details-revealed

The REAL reason there was a split is because he didn't want her in his life anymore; that is the simple reason and the truest. He didn't want her as a wife and he was clearly not ready or under any real obligation to marry her, just because she felt entitled to it. He didn't have to marry her just because the press wanted a 'hawt young royal couple' for them to coo over; strangely, the media and Kate felt she had some right to it since she 'earned' it.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on April 02, 2017, 09:22:29 am
Look who's popped in to meet the in-laws: Pippa invites Kate and Wills to a pre-wedding summit at her hedge fund fiancé's £17m London mansion seven weeks before they tie the knot

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4371670/Kate-Prince-William-meet-Pippa-s-future-laws.html#ixzz4d4vVknEj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 02, 2017, 01:26:16 pm
Awful frock, looks as common as muck in it, and such a miserable face to go with it, plus the hair scraped back.  Looks more like the char lady to me than a married in royal.  She will never cut it, she really is common in every sense of the word.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: logically on April 02, 2017, 01:40:11 pm
Why those shoes on a day off and why with that dress? 


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on April 02, 2017, 05:21:07 pm
^ I bet Waity knew about the paps lurking there, hence the get-up. Same old Meddledoom tactic, nothing's changed.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 05, 2017, 01:43:33 pm
Just occurred to me recently, we got no media info on Mothers Day did we.  No piccie, no they spent the day with the sprogs at AH, Dingley Dell or wherever.   Usually get something don´t we.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Stargazer on April 10, 2017, 02:54:56 pm
 Is your eye makeup ageing your face like Kate Middleton?  The clever guide for applying cosmetics to flatter EVERY eye shape

Your tried and tested method of sketching on some eyeliner and applying a coat of mascara in the morning could well be adding years to your face.

Incorrect makeup technique can make you look years older - but the right one can boost your looks in an instant.

According to International makeup artist, Ariane Poole, women who fail to update their eye makeup technique as they move into their 30s technique are making themselves look older - and the Duchess of Cambridge, 35, is just as guilty as the rest of us. 

Explaining further, she said: 'The reason for this is, as women, many of us learnt to do our makeup in our teens and twenties with the prime objective of making ourselves look more grown up, to give us more authority and confidence.' 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4386434/The-guide-applying-cosmetics-flatter-eye.html

She's not going to like this!  :tehe:



Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on April 12, 2017, 06:23:48 pm
They were never meant to be, but regrettably Kate wouldn't let him go and lead his own life, she insisted on imposing herself into his and then wonders why he looks at her with frustration or increasingly outright hatred. I do think that if he were still single he would be happy, or if he had been able to get a few years of breathing space after the breakup, he might have started dating tentatively and maybe even found Jecca again and married her. It's not like he was supposed to have to fend her off.  I'm not saying she should have dropped off the face of the earth, but she should have let him go and get on with life, no matter how painful it would have been for her.

Look who's popped in to meet the in-laws: Pippa invites Kate and Wills to a pre-wedding summit at her hedge fund fiancé's £17m London mansion seven weeks before they tie the knot
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4371670/Kate-Prince-William-meet-Pippa-s-future-laws.html#ixzz4d4vVknEj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Neither look like they can stand each other and I am certain that at some point they'll start openly quarreling. I just hope they do not start openly arguing and hating each other during their trip to the concentration camps.

I do think that this is a prime example as to why Princess Michael was right about how university couples should NOT date or marry. University isn't a good foundation for a real world relationship. Really, living together and boozing together is certainly not at all a real foundation and four years in the same school isn't the same as the real world. University is an equalizer, but it's not reality. After graduation, William was supposed to start duties and tours and various military training and exercises. Kate was clearly meant to get a posh job and then marry well, not wait a decade and get an irrevocable nickname.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on April 12, 2017, 10:45:07 pm
^ Chances are they'll be summoned to BP to be given a good talking to before they go


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Tatiana on April 13, 2017, 06:08:02 am
 I highly doubt that Sheridan. 


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on April 13, 2017, 06:12:43 am
^ Chances are they'll be summoned to BP to be given a good talking to before they go

Those days are done and over with; they're too old to be lectured and frankly it's clear that any lecture is vieqwed as a joke, to be indulged in until they are out of sight and frankly I think no one has any hope for them. It's clear that the monarchy is slaloming down into self-destruction.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on April 13, 2017, 01:39:22 pm
^ Seeing any lecture as joke is really what it is with them. Otherwise we wouldn't have the (countlessly repeated) disasters with them as we do.

Prince Charles' secret tension with newlyweds William and Kate: How the royal was 'irked' by the couple's 'tasteless' photo opportunities on their 2011 Canada tour

    William and Kate visited Canada and LA two months after wedding in 2011
    Prince felt tour featured too many 'tasteless' photo opportunities
    Couple posed in cowboy hats as they launched the Calgary Stampede
    Kate suffered embarrassing wardrobe malfunction at Calgary Airport 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4405622/Prince-Charles-secret-feud-newlyweds-William-Kate.html

Amongst other things, he supposedly criticised that the two treated the tour like their personal holiday.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on April 13, 2017, 01:45:40 pm
^ That's because it WAS a personal holiday  :tehe:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: buflesse on April 13, 2017, 02:29:36 pm
Interesting that this is coming out now...


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on April 13, 2017, 02:48:19 pm
^ Seeing any lecture as joke is really what it is with them. Otherwise we wouldn't have the (countlessly repeated) disasters with them as we do.
Prince Charles' secret tension with newlyweds William and Kate: How the royal was 'irked' by the couple's 'tasteless' photo opportunities on their 2011 Canada tour
    William and Kate visited Canada and LA two months after wedding in 2011
    Prince felt tour featured too many 'tasteless' photo opportunities
    Couple posed in cowboy hats as they launched the Calgary Stampede
    Kate suffered embarrassing wardrobe malfunction at Calgary Airport 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4405622/Prince-Charles-secret-feud-newlyweds-William-Kate.html
Amongst other things, he supposedly criticised that the two treated the tour like their personal holiday.

It was a holiday; WK were supposed to live quietly in the Welsh countryside and instead they both found an excuse to go to Canada of all places. NO real reason, just because Kate felt like going on a trip and then going to Los Angeles to hang around with movie stars.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on April 13, 2017, 08:04:49 pm
^ Chances are they'll be summoned to BP to be given a good talking to before they go

Those days are done and over with; they're too old to be lectured and frankly it's clear that any lecture is vieqwed as a joke, to be indulged in until they are out of sight and frankly I think no one has any hope for them. It's clear that the monarchy is slaloming down into self-destruction.

Yeah time for lectures and talking to are over. It's too late for any kind of discussion with these two knot heads.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Stargazer on April 16, 2017, 02:34:47 pm
Duchess of Cambridge looks radiant in a recycled cream coat as she joins Prince William, Princess Beatrice and other royals for an Easter Sunday service near Windsor Castle

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge looked in excellent spirits as they walked to St George's Chapel near Windsor Castle for an Easter Sunday service this morning.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4416018/Duchess-Cambridge-Easter-Sunday-church-service.html

They look happy today. No sign of Haza!
 :)


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on April 16, 2017, 02:40:25 pm
No one is having any truck with The Pyscho Potato Head.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 16, 2017, 03:58:21 pm
Not sure I woud describe her as looking happy

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/04/16/13/3F4B809F00000578-4416018-Classic_look_Kate_wore_her_brown_locks_swept_back_in_a_low_chign-a-65_1492345907593.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/04/16/13/3F4CE81000000578-4416018-image-m-66_1492345930797.jpg

Looks to me as though she has been crying half the night.  Look at the second piccie, hard as nails and not a happy bunny, which leads me to suspect it was a three line whip to go to the Easter service.  And no sprog pr tools today either, dear me, bit of a blow for her.  Outfit looks as though it was has been jinxed again with the team of tarts altering it around, fits where it meets.  What looks like a belt effort but is not a bit lower at the front.  And the colour, for Easter, was she having a laugh and giving two fingers to the rf, again.  Not quite the thing to do.

Should have stayed away and saved us seeing that man like, hard faced apology for a female.  She has made herself like that, all that bulimnic anorexia, very unbecoming.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on April 16, 2017, 04:04:50 pm
Bulimics have very puffy faces.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 18, 2017, 12:38:56 pm
I see the bone idle duo could not wait to get in on the act with haza and his emotional problems.  In less than 48 hours he had to get on the bandwago.  They want to bring up "their" sprogs to be open about their emotions, and they think the "stiff upper lip" should be done away with.

Hmmm, got that a bit wrong didn´t they. Do they mean Nanny Maria needs to raise them to be open about their emotions, because the bone idle duo never appear to have a bond with those sprogs, for reasons mentioned on another thread, and I could not see any sprog opening up to either of those two, why would they, their confidante will be Nanny Maria or someone similar.  If juggers put him up to this then he has well and truly lost the plot.  And their four ugly mugs on front page of Express, talk about use your bro and deceased mother for pr, they really are scraping the barrel now.  It always has to be about him doesn´t it, him him and him again and again.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9pQGuaW0AARpeW.jpg


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on April 18, 2017, 01:08:49 pm
I see the bone idle duo could not wait to get in on the act with haza and his emotional problems.  In less than 48 hours he had to get on the bandwago.  They want to bring up "their" sprogs to be open about their emotions, and they think the "stiff upper lip" should be done away with.

Hmmm, got that a bit wrong didn´t they. Do they mean Nanny Maria needs to raise them to be open about their emotions, because the bone idle duo never appear to have a bond with those sprogs, for reasons mentioned on another thread, and I could not see any sprog opening up to either of those two, why would they, their confidante will be Nanny Maria or someone similar.  If juggers put him up to this then he has well and truly lost the plot.  And their four ugly mugs on front page of Express, talk about use your bro and deceased mother for pr, they really are scraping the barrel now.  It always has to be about him doesn´t it, him him and him again and again.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9pQGuaW0AARpeW.jpg

From the behaviour of the kiddies thus far, doesn't seem that they are being raised very well. Sorry, but where is the early religious instruction for them, what with them being future reps of the Church of England, etc. Hmm, Council Caro won't let go of that control?
Willy is the expert of using Mummy to earn sympathy points so he is not to be outdone by Harry in that regard.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on April 18, 2017, 05:27:14 pm
Willy has just been on TV news on his laptop talking to Lady Gaga about her emotional problems! 

He comes across as a completely insincere twat.  There are people who have trained for years to work with those who have problems not a deluded twit who hasn't a clue and just using it all for personal PR.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 18, 2017, 08:45:06 pm
^Well suited then, one as loopy as the other.  No wonder she calls herself lady gaga, very apt.  She is not even an A-lister, mind you, neither is he, defintely on the scrap heap these days.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on April 18, 2017, 09:25:03 pm
^^It seems odd to me Willy now on news about mental health a day after Harry opens up about his issues...it's as if Willy's  riding on Harry's coat tails


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on April 18, 2017, 10:42:57 pm
^Oh, I am sure he is. Can´t have haza hogging the limelight can he.  Just saw the piccie of him in the "office" at KP  -  just like him, ancient, dull and boring.  Oh, and we had to be told he had a mac pro (5) or something like that.  Yeah, and all those people on the breadline who can´t even afford a decent laptop.  Disgusting.  Also the little matter that nothing, absolutely nothing, in KP was bought and paid for with his own money.  Not a gan of gaga but at least she worked to earn what she had.  He really is a dull, boring, jealous, old looking man.  Obviously juggers thought it a good idea to ride on haza´s coat tails, again.  No real surprise, surprised they did not release this rubbish just a few hours later.  Haza on the news, and the papers, dear me no, can´t have that.  So pathetic, bill medd photographed and televised talking to gaga  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:  What a buffoon, he really does not have one decent brain cell.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 11, 2017, 09:33:10 pm
Interesting article from The Spectator re bill medd, haza and council cath

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/made-in-windsor-how-kate-william-and-harry-became-britains-biggest-reality-tv-show/


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 11, 2017, 10:33:18 pm
A comment I found on RD, and I completely agree with it.

Too little too late on the queen's part, imo. I don't see Kate ever ever ever seeing herself as anything but a celebrity, and Billy has long since burned any bridges that would make him credible as a person who cares about others, his role, or doing anything that even remotely benefits Britain. IMO Billy and Cathy are subjects of mockery and derision and the only thing they have is titles, and when supposedly influential people appear in the entertainment section of the news that says it all. Again. JMO The queen has no one but herself to blame, and if this flailing and bailing is an attempt to 're regalize the 'firm' I don't see it as anything but empty talk and a last ditch Hail Mary from a desperate woman. JMO

Could not have put it better myself, very well written.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 11, 2017, 10:41:15 pm
Interesting article from The Spectator re bill medd, haza and council cath
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/made-in-windsor-how-kate-william-and-harry-became-britains-biggest-reality-tv-show/
\

This sums it all up. That video of Kate and Harry and William (I didn't watch it thankfully) talking about mental health issues was making it all about THEIR perspective and about how their adolescent leftover neuroses is in fact just all about them and how THEY are affected. All of this is about their own glory and frankly by hanging only about celebs, it is clear that this is a fun thing, but only for THEM and their privileged clique.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on May 12, 2017, 01:13:02 am
^ I believe PWs problem is he just doesn't want that toad clinging to him. He needs to man up and kick her to the curb already instead of losing another day of his life with that vile jackassss then he would be able to relax and regroup and come into his own. Of course His One will help him tremendously.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 12, 2017, 04:38:52 am
He needs to just divorce her and blast her out of his life; if he had done that in 2007 I am certain he would be married to Jecca by now. He would be a happily married man with actual work history in the military and he would be having two kids of his own with real heirs.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: kolkomilko on May 12, 2017, 01:00:01 pm
^ Agree with every words. Anyway I think Jecca was his real type of girl.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 12, 2017, 01:32:53 pm
Interesting article from The Spectator re bill medd, haza and council cath

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/made-in-windsor-how-kate-william-and-harry-became-britains-biggest-reality-tv-show/

Quite an interesting, and IMO honest, comment on the above article

Sorry, you hit some marks and completely missed others. The gauche-climbing opportunists the Middletons a steadying influence? Please. Photogenic Kate? Not likely -And Brits certainly don't need to be called racists by an interfering American PR lout and the equally nauseating Yank Media Meggie. It's very fair to add that she ought to be deeply ashamed using the Brits so badly - small wonder they don't like her. Remember how she whined and snivelled about the obstrusive media around her house (or more likely the house of the live-in she soundly dumped when she went on the make for richer fry) and there were only a few people? Yeah, so well-known - not.  Like Middleton, she's a phony and a user and out to get what she can out of one half of a pair of disappointing, lazy, stupid and arrogant princes. But I am sure there a few holdouts from the Diana was a Saint era who think they are beyond reproach.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on May 12, 2017, 01:35:58 pm
^YES! Love that on target comment!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 14, 2017, 02:54:32 am
^ Agree with every words.
Anyway I think Jecca was his real type of girl.

I do think that 2007 was the first time in his life where he had to make a sincere effort to steer his life and he welshed on it. If he had pushed back and filed stalking charges I am certain that he would in fact be married to Jecca, but instead he prefers to regress to the part of his life where he didn't have to make an effort or even try. Same with Kate; she keeps refusing to get it into her head that she has to make an effort and get to work.  I am sure that neither are able to cope in this new phase of their lives, where they actually have to make a true effort to make something of themselves, but now at this point in time I do think that neither want to. Both are a media creation and now the reality is shining through. Pity Jecca never wanted royal life, William would have burned cities to the ground to be able to marry her.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 16, 2017, 09:34:54 pm
BP Garden Party  -  what a dreadful frock, so dull and boring, pale earrings, pale loopy head band, pale, badly altered frock dress, just bleughhhhhh. Bet it cost a fortune for her to look like that as well.  And what is that awful clutch bag about, looks as thought a dog just threw up all over it.  Never gets it rights does she  -  at least she is consistent in one thing.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/18/40667F8100000578-4511802-image-a-52_1494955687086.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/17/4065DADA00000578-4511802-image-m-13_1494952330366.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/18/406694DE00000578-4511802-image-a-54_1494955769920.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_9QCqkVwAEsoxE.jpg

I the the trio of tarts must have helped her modify this, the centre is way off

http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll34/Faith7852/Kate%20Back%20View_zpscjjypsku.jpg





Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 16, 2017, 09:57:52 pm
No matter how they stand at attention, no one will ever truly take them seriously.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on May 16, 2017, 11:58:01 pm
^Except PW isn't standing at attention.  He's just standing.  Notice the difference between PP and William.  PP knows how to stand at attention, even if it's uncomfortable at his age.  At least button your coat, PW!

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/18/40667F8100000578-4511802-image-a-52_1494955687086.jpg (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/18/40667F8100000578-4511802-image-a-52_1494955687086.jpg)


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on May 17, 2017, 12:49:17 am
Good find!  :flower:

Interesting dynamic in that picture - wow, Beatrice looks as serious as her grandfather.  :easter-sly:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on May 17, 2017, 02:22:36 am
The Royal Family @RoyalFamily
Around 20,000 slices of cake, 20,000 sandwiches and over 27,000 cups of tea are served at a Garden Party. #BuckinghamPalace

https://mobile.twitter.com/RoyalFamily/status/864525273525518336

Rebecca English @RE_DailyMail
Kate said today she was really looking forward to her sister's wedding - but she was a bit worried about how her children will behave!

Kate told a garden party guest she was hopeful George & Charlotte - pageboy and bridesmaid - would be good 'but you never know at that age'



It's party time! Royals turn out in force for the Queen's first garden party of the season - as Kate reveals she is 'slightly nervous' about how George and Charlotte will behave at her sister Pippa's wedding

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4511802/amp/The-Duchess-Cambridge-discusses-Pippa-s-wedding.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Rosella on May 17, 2017, 03:59:52 am
It wouldn't be a Royal engagement for them without one or the other of the Cambridges making remarks about George and what he likes, planes, cars, trains, dinosaurs, stickers and on and on, and also about his behaviour. It's usually William who complains about him being noisy and or destructive. Hasn't he ever read any stories about himself at the same age? Perhaps he should! At least in his homes and grounds Willie can get away from any noise if he wishes.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on May 18, 2017, 01:13:04 pm
Clips from BP garden party


Kate Middleton: Are kiddies over here as well behaved as they are in Australia
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2b4F8MuVmYY&feature=youtu.be

William hoping to do scandinavian tour


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on May 18, 2017, 04:53:48 pm

A DM commentator called freecat said that the Middletons had a ton of dirt on PW hence his marriage to Waity Katy and someone called Antilles  concurred with that remark.  If only those walls at Maison de Bang-Bang could talk...



Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on May 18, 2017, 06:54:48 pm
^ Surely the dirt that is claimed against PW is also against the medds? So I don't buy it. I am thinking it has to be the absolute worst for PW to cave to pressure which is yet another act of treason by the medds and when PW leaves/kicks her out it and he will the sham they call a marriage would have been for naught. Drugs? Alcohol abuse? Homosexuality?  In this day and age is nothing to hide.. I am willing to bet it has to do with upskirting.... nothing else makes sense here.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on May 18, 2017, 07:01:37 pm
^^^I cannot understand what Kate is saying.  Her accent is so contrived and it's as if she has a mouth full of marbles. 


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: buflesse on May 18, 2017, 07:21:07 pm
She sounds so fake and OTT. No one in the aristocracy actually speaks like that.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on May 18, 2017, 07:44:17 pm
^^^^ I have heard the same thing Val. And some day the walls at Maison de Bang Bang will talk.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on May 18, 2017, 08:52:58 pm
^^^I cannot understand what Kate is saying.  Her accent is so contrived and it's as if she has a mouth full of marbles. 

She sounds like a *fool*.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on May 19, 2017, 07:33:43 am
She sounds like what she is


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 21, 2017, 07:23:45 pm
I came across this on Instagram (katemiddletonvideos).  Think it is from the Tea Party for the kids at BP, looks like it anyway.  Council cath touches the arm of bill medd and he gives her a look, says something and council cath dropped her hand   -  no love lost there.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUDKHjjA86w/


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on May 21, 2017, 09:20:46 pm
^ It's quite funny if it weren't so sad.. I'm not sure if it looks like he thinks some pleb touched him or if he's appalled/ disgusted or if he's surprised, but it does look like he thinks "wt actual f?"..


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 21, 2017, 09:44:46 pm
I was trawling through some photos on google images and came across this one from October 2012  -  a short while ahead of the news sprog I was on the way. Wow, look at bill medd, how young he looks.  I clicked into the photo and it brought up the article it was included in.   Fast forward to May 2017, not even 5 years, and look how old he looks, and how her face has sagged and dropped these days.  Interesting just how much they have changed it was caught my eye.  Can´t say it is the sprogs, Nanny Maria and co. are the ones on 24/7 call for them and got all the teething troubles, sleepless nights etc.  Or worry about money, paying a mortgage, needing a new car  -  they have the most luxurious, free lifestyle, everyone at their beck and call, so how come they have aged so much in such a short space of time.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/10/11/article-2216030-157307E6000005DC-239_634x668.jpg

The full article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2216030/Kate-Middleton-Prince-William-reunite-evening-Loulous-club-Mayfair.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on May 21, 2017, 10:02:39 pm
In these pics, Bill looks as if that other woman is his wife and Kate is some random stranger.
Anyone know who the woman is?
And who the man is with Pip?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/10/11/article-2216030-15728F90000005DC-123_634x576.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/10/11/article-2216030-1572C7D3000005DC-676_634x858.jpg

I'm pretty sure they both look like death warmed over because their relationship is so bad. Some people in a new/ good relationship positively glow & look younger, others in bad relationships look older/ haggard. A neighbour looks 5 years younger since being together with his new gf (another neighbour actually, both around 50 years old).
They look so aged, because they suck each other's blood out and eat each other's nerves. No other explanation and it's the most logical. They are very bad for each other and it shows. He can't escape her anymore as before they were married. Even if they live apart and he takes breaks from her, he's still shackled to her, always married, she's always hovering in the background. And she can't escape him either, which she did only once anyway, that one time when she had a backbone and fended for herself. He was the one always running away, but now, no matter how far he runs, he can't escape the vows he gave. He refused to wear a wedding ring, but he's more constrained through this marriage than a meangingful and symbolic piece of jewellery ever could. He thought if he didn't wear the ring, he could pretend nothing changed, but his face tells a different story. Dumb, very dumb, William.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: deGuernsey on May 22, 2017, 12:02:35 pm
I came across this on Instagram (katemiddletonvideos).  Think it is from the Tea Party for the kids at BP, looks like it anyway.  Council cath touches the arm of bill medd and he gives her a look, says something and council cath dropped her hand   -  no love lost there.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUDKHjjA86w/
It seems as if he says don't touch me and KM removes her hand from his arm. Ouch isn't the word for it. Damn, PW , annul her already! Good find.

Does anyone know who the man with PH is? I wonder what PH thought as he walked away from THAT scene? It should make him think and rethink MMs wanting him to marry her. He should think Long and Hard. And with his brain.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on May 22, 2017, 06:41:44 pm
Living a lie will age you tremendously.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on May 29, 2017, 01:30:24 pm
'It's taken me 20 years to come to terms with my mother's death': Prince William reveals his regret that Princess Diana didn't get to meet Kate or her grandchildren as he poses for family photoshoot

    The family-of-four have posed in the black and white shot for the latest issue of men's style magazine GQ
    Prince William, the cover star, opens up about family life and how he wished his mother could have met Kate
    He reveals how it's taken him 20 years to come to terms with her death as he discusses mental health
    Says he will 'fight' for his children to have a normal life and wants George to grow up in a 'real environment'
    The family dog Lupo also features in the shoot, which sees the royals relaxing in their garden
    Princess Diana was killed in a tragic car accident in 1997 when Prince William was 15
    Prince Harry did a similar interview admitting he fell into 'total chaos' following his mother's death


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4551882/Prince-William-speaks-candidly-Princess-Diana.html

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/29/11/40E870F800000578-0-image-a-3_1496052790278.jpg

First pic in ages of the family, and we get G's ar*e (to show the contempt for the common people) and C looks elsewhere, likely heading off to nanny M..

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/29/11/40E8711C00000578-4551882-image-a-17_1496055266729.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/29/12/40E8710800000578-4551882-Prince_William_is_the_star_of_GQ_s_latest_magazine_issue_and_ope-m-25_1496057634737.jpg

There's a typo, it was supposed to say "William - A Prince Past His Prime".


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 29, 2017, 09:45:22 pm
That photon in the garden is, as usual, photoshopped.   Notice how him and her are ever so clean, and yet again the sprogs are out of focus.  Do they really believe we fall for all this.  Bill medd top half does not look as if it belongs to the bottom half, and look at how odd his right shoulder, as we look at him is all odd, and the arm looks ever so thin.  Must be Christ Jackson messing about with it on a bad day, because that sure is not a proper family photo.  Neither of them looking at the sprogs but at the camera.   Bill medd head looks super imposed and too big for him.  As for the dog, what can I say, looks more like a baby mouintain goat. Very disjointed and very badly photoshopped together, as usual.  They look like two strangers, photoshopped into a field with two unknown sprogs. Not even an ounce of warmth in that photo between anyone.  Hastily cobbled together no doubt.

Comments pretty scathing, and many are sick of his "woe is me, my mother died" programme.. Many kids lose their mothers, in very poor and tragic circumstances.  He really needs to realise that the Diana get out of jail card had long gone and nobody wants to hear about it any more.





Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on May 29, 2017, 10:44:43 pm
Another one to file under "Awkward Family Photos".


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on May 29, 2017, 11:18:53 pm
Yes, very odd photo.

As for the headline, why mention his prime? He sadly has not aged well and looked much better when he was younger. Why not something about 20 years after Diana? I don't think he has any new projects lately and the interview was about losing his mother.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on May 29, 2017, 11:31:56 pm
Likely because using his mother in the headline would have been tasteless and if he has an ounce of an inkling of public opinion he knows that putting her name on the headline would have been too much, same for the editors at GQ. The in his prime part is laughable though, we all know he's past it and anyway, why try to make it out as if it is so? If he would at least knuckle down as royal and be out & about and do something (good) with his position, then yes, fine, he'd be in his prime. But like this? Always crying about mummy, showing the press the finger at every turn and playing pilot when he needs good pr and otherwise twiddling his thumbs whilst looking as if a vampire is sucking the life out of him is not being in his prime!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 30, 2017, 01:52:22 am
Physically and in regards to having it all before him, he's way past it; he was in his prime in his teens/twenties and after 2007 it all started to go downhill. He's just like the guy in high school who seemed to have a limitless future and has now hit a wall. He's not going any further and as for doing something, what on earth is he going to do? I mean really, how on earth is he going to influence anyone over anything? He's never built any real work and he's not going to be listened to; right now there is a real problem over the entire world going up in flames and no one has time for his asinine causes and whimpering. Notice how he's never at any major summits or conferences where real leadership is required and not even Obama has met with him (yet has met Harry).


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on May 30, 2017, 01:57:26 am
^^ Normally I think it's tasteless when he mentions Diana, as it's always about the sympathy card and he's a grown man in his thirties now, but in this case it would actually make sense because it's 20 years since her death, sort of a "milestone" in a way.  :dontknow:

^ What happened to becoming a full-time royal? I think when he starts doing more stuff, people will take notice and he can increase his credibility and influence over time. But it's going to take a lot of work because people are used to either not seeing him or hearing him complain about things.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on May 30, 2017, 02:25:47 am
Until he starts acting like a full grown adult I've tuned him out.  If I see a headline bemoaning his life or comparing his issues publicly with every day people, I don't pay attention.  I don't think I'm alone and this hurts his charities.  The world is not there to soothe him.  That's not how his role works.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 30, 2017, 02:43:58 am

Quote
^^ Normally I think it's tasteless when he mentions Diana, as it's always about the sympathy card and he's a grown man in his thirties now, but in this case it would actually make sense because it's 20 years since her death, sort of a "milestone" in a way.  :dontknow:

His mother has been dead twenty years and if a normal guy moaned about this he would be viewed as a complete nut-job, not a sympathetic figure. I do believe that this is the reason that no one really wants to hang around him or marry him since he's caught in the same kind of cycle that an alcoholic is.

Quote
^ What happened to becoming a full-time royal? I think when he starts doing more stuff, people will take notice and he can increase his credibility and influence over time. But it's going to take a lot of work because people are used to either not seeing him or hearing him complain about things.

 As for full time, it's too late to take himself to the level he should be at and he can't just get more influence and power when he can't control his in-laws and can't inspire his wife to work and even behave. Now, if he had worked full time from 2013 out he might be at a better level, or would in fact be at a higher level if he had worked full time since he was a teen, but regrettably he didn't and shirked his fair share of work.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: LadyLaura on May 30, 2017, 02:46:10 am
whining lying hypocrite wants his kids to have a normal life and then proceeds to photograph themselves behind a palace wall topped with barbed wire. He needs to shut up and go away.
and if he is still bringing up Diana after 20 years, then he should avail himself of some of that mental health services he and the rake he married are always promoting.
He really has no clue how to be a real living functioning man. All round hypocrite.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 30, 2017, 06:33:48 am
Why can't they just grow up like everyone else and carry their weight? I would be so fed up.

Taking a look at the comments section, almost every other comment says that the monarchy has to be abolished and something like this is getting worse. It must be a living nightmare for the courtiers and aristocrats who know all too well that revolutions are not kind to dethroned royals or aristocrats. Each new article talks about how worthless they are and how the system has to end and in some comments, violence is promoted.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 30, 2017, 10:12:31 am
Was thinking about that GQ article  -  comes to something when they have to go to a magazine to get some pr.  Again, all about him, him and him again.  Loads of comments, all seeing through him and using his mother for pr, sick to death of his "woe is me". If, as someone said on here on another thread, HM and Phil read the paps, I do hope they can see how much bill medd and council cath are disliked. Between them, and dopey haza with murky markle, they have done an excellent job of making the British monarchy a waste of space, time and taxpayer money.  Who wants z-listers as part of the monarchy?  Very few I would imagine.  Some mentioned the photo, as I did, and how it is stiff and photoshopped, and as above, get to see the backside of sprog I, and sprog II doing her own thing and a side view.  Other wondering why he has the need to tell the world how upset he was about his other.  Many saying grow up, my parent died when I was x years old, no financial support, life was tough, but we got there, shut up and go away.   A few small examples.  GQ  -  have a right laugh over that one, and that photo, if they really think the public are going to go "ga ga" over it they are sadly mistake.  Their problem is now that the more they try and make themselves look good, the more the public see through it all.  The only people on their in their defence are the old sugars and the paid trolls.  The rf need to sit back and take stock, they are the tainted, lazy, money grabbing, greedy couple  - definitely NOT the golden couple, never were, it is just that people did not see through them, but boy have they now.  Sick to death of them their laziness, lies and deceit.  The sad thing is HM does not seem to care, they can do what they like, when they like, use taxpayer public purse to buy and do whater they want, cause untold problem with the two sprogs, and still she sits back and does nothing.  She will be remember in history books as the Queen of England who sat back and did nothing to save the monarchy, she has no back bone, just thinks it is okay and the monarchy will live forever  -  in her dreams sadly.  When HM passes IMO many things will be changed, and I personally very much doubt it will make it past bill medd, if that.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 30, 2017, 07:05:02 pm
How on earth did he pull a GQ cover, that is what I would like to know.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 30, 2017, 07:51:37 pm
Who would refuse him KF, he could do their mag a lot of harm if he wanted to, we know what a petulant, nastly big brat he is.  The joke is on him, not exactly done himself any favours with it, and that photo was very badly ´shopped together, very badly.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on May 30, 2017, 09:12:13 pm
Just curious.  Do they get paid to be in GQ?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: dianab on May 31, 2017, 12:30:58 pm
I write to ministers just like my dad, says William: Duke of Cambridge reveals his interest in politics during GQ interview but insists he doesn't 'lobby' them
-Prince William is writing to Government ministers like his father Prince Charles
-Says he writes 'purely to point them towards people I think they should see'
-Also revealed he is interested in politics and can feel 'frustrated' by the constraints his position places on him
By Rebecca English Royal Correspondent For The Daily Mail
PUBLISHED: 01:32 BST, 31 May 2017 | UPDATED: 10:59 BST, 31 May 2017


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ieg7BXas
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

HAHAHAHA:
shorty larsen, Perpignan, France, 5 hours ago
He thinks he and his old man are going to be King? Nurse, come quickly. The tablets, the tablets.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ief2FNl8
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I see William as passive agressive sort of person.... I think knows exactly what he's doing when he accepted talk to Alastair Campbell

"Prince's audience with Alastair Campbell, the man who loves insulting the royals
He's made sneering comments over the years about the Royal Family. So it was a surprise that Alastair Campbell was offered an interview with Prince William, which the former Labour spin doctor boasted about yesterday on Twitter. Here's a selection of his anti-royal remarks..."



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4iefwji7W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I dont think that William and Campbell are 'that' different if you guys are getting me....


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on May 31, 2017, 01:14:04 pm
^What an absolute numpty.  Don't let your mouth write checks your ego can't cash, Billy Bob!


Title: articl
Post by: gingerboy24 on May 31, 2017, 02:50:19 pm
Re the GQ article, and those dreadful photos, a friend of mine sent me this a short while ago, interesting that many think in a similar way, not one of the bill medd great successes at all, bet he wishes he never did it now.

http://lovelolaheart.com/?p=4060#comments


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 31, 2017, 04:53:16 pm
I write to ministers just like my dad, says William: Duke of Cambridge reveals his interest in politics during GQ interview but insists he doesn't 'lobby' them
-Prince William is writing to Government ministers like his father Prince Charles
-Says he writes 'purely to point them towards people I think they should see'
-Also revealed he is interested in politics and can feel 'frustrated' by the constraints his position places on him
By Rebecca English Royal Correspondent For The Daily Mail
PUBLISHED: 01:32 BST, 31 May 2017 | UPDATED: 10:59 BST, 31 May 2017
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ieg7BXas
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

HAHAHAHA:
shorty larsen, Perpignan, France, 5 hours ago
He thinks he and his old man are going to be King? Nurse, come quickly. The tablets, the tablets.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ief2FNl8
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I see William as passive agressive sort of person.... I think knows exactly what he's doing when he accepted talk to Alastair Campbell

"Prince's audience with Alastair Campbell, the man who loves insulting the royals
He's made sneering comments over the years about the Royal Family. So it was a surprise that Alastair Campbell was offered an interview with Prince William, which the former Labour spin doctor boasted about yesterday on Twitter. Here's a selection of his anti-royal remarks..."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4iefwji7W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I dont think that William and Campbell are 'that' different if you guys are getting me....

So basically he's meddling in the political process and clearly not aware that he's giving ammo to the Republican movement? If he starts interfering in regards to corresponding with heads of state, that is interfering with the diplomatic process. As for his frustrations, he needs to channel his energy into appearances. That will always be his official level and he will not be anything more than just an ornamental representative.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on May 31, 2017, 05:25:52 pm
So, PH doesn't want his children/son to grow up "behind palace walls" but the photo is taken behind palace walls?   The guy is clueless:

http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/PrinceWilliamGQFamilyPhoto.png (http://lovelolaheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/PrinceWilliamGQFamilyPhoto.png)


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on May 31, 2017, 06:27:06 pm
walls with barb wires on top. isn't he also bulinding a tree wall around KP ?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 31, 2017, 06:48:39 pm
I have the bad feeling that William is becoming seriously sick and Kate is feeding that sickness to keep control over him. Barbed wire, huge walls, and now he's going to 'fight' for his kids to have a normal life. I wonder if whether or not Kate is getting him worked up regularly and feeding his (possible) mental illness. No way is he making any sense and I do think that Kate stokes his resentments vie her own persecution complex. Everyone thinks he sounds crazy and I do believe he is utterly unaware and needs major help/intervention. It'll come to a bad end surely and then she'll go down with him one way or another.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on May 31, 2017, 09:34:31 pm
Council Cath is definitely feeding his sickness to keep control over the Idiot Prince. She and that mother of hers do it on a regular basis. They need to be rounded up and hauled far away somewhere. Then maybe The Idiot will regain whatever sense he has in that jumbled up brain of his.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: dianab on May 31, 2017, 09:42:50 pm
I write to ministers just like my dad, says William: Duke of Cambridge reveals his interest in politics during GQ interview but insists he doesn't 'lobby' them
-Prince William is writing to Government ministers like his father Prince Charles
-Says he writes 'purely to point them towards people I think they should see'
-Also revealed he is interested in politics and can feel 'frustrated' by the constraints his position places on him
By Rebecca English Royal Correspondent For The Daily Mail
PUBLISHED: 01:32 BST, 31 May 2017 | UPDATED: 10:59 BST, 31 May 2017
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ieg7BXas
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

HAHAHAHA:
shorty larsen, Perpignan, France, 5 hours ago
He thinks he and his old man are going to be King? Nurse, come quickly. The tablets, the tablets.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4ief2FNl8
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I see William as passive agressive sort of person.... I think knows exactly what he's doing when he accepted talk to Alastair Campbell

"Prince's audience with Alastair Campbell, the man who loves insulting the royals
He's made sneering comments over the years about the Royal Family. So it was a surprise that Alastair Campbell was offered an interview with Prince William, which the former Labour spin doctor boasted about yesterday on Twitter. Here's a selection of his anti-royal remarks..."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4557220/I-write-ministers-just-like-dad-says-William.html#ixzz4iefwji7W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I dont think that William and Campbell are 'that' different if you guys are getting me....

So basically he's meddling in the political process and clearly not aware that he's giving ammo to the Republican movement? If he starts interfering in regards to corresponding with heads of state, that is interfering with the diplomatic process. As for his frustrations, he needs to channel his energy into appearances. That will always be his official level and he will not be anything more than just an ornamental representative.
Agree with everything you wrote ... BUT is he really NOT aware of his help to the Republican party? IMO he's doing his best to drag down the farce that BRF IS. IMO his behavior is totally voluntary


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 31, 2017, 11:24:32 pm
Each time he meddles, he puts himself in a position where an opposing party would work to drag him down. I know the Dems get a bad rap as a result of the Clintons, but they are ruthless in push-back if provoked. He's making more enemies for himself and his family/nation and that is the last thing he needs. If he doesn't quit at some point he will go too far. This family is utterly out of control with Charles making statements about Tibet and the economy and writing letters to ministers and meanwhile I am sure HM gets up to things behind the scenes. He doesn't do appearances and connect with the people and he has the gall to think that he knows politics and diplomacy?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: dianab on June 01, 2017, 01:02:05 pm
WELL SAID!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on June 02, 2017, 01:55:18 pm
I don't remember this being posted here, if it was the sorry, don't waste your time!
---

>> Wills wasn't ill but grieving

Prince William did an interview with GQ magazine to promote his Heads Together charity, which aims to break down the ‘taboo and stigma’ surrounding mental health.

I’ve always wondered exactly what those taboos and stigmas actually are, and how they apply when faced with the effects of someone else’s psychosis or psychopathy. And to be honest, I don’t think the Prince is helping.

During the interview, he talked again about the grief he experienced when his mother died and the difficulty he had in coming to terms with her death.

Yes, it must have been awful for him, living out this tragedy in the public eye. Yet the Prince was bereaved, not mentally ill. And it is unhelpful for everyone to unintentionally conflate his situation with serious mental illness.

Meanwhile, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge released a new photo this week. The arty black and white snap — so last decade, darling — was gloomy and odd. It featured them and their children lounging under a tree at their Anmer Hall home.

William appears as if he is wearing a Lone Ranger mask, Kate looks maniacal, Princess Charlotte is trying to get away, while Prince George has his back to the camera. ‘I don’t want him growing up behind palace walls — he has to be out there,’ said William. In the background, the huge walls of Anmer, topped with what looks like rolls of barbed wire, loom large. Another mixed message. <<

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4564802/Hen-dos-national-embarrassment.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 02, 2017, 04:08:16 pm
Given that I actually have a mental illness, there's a difference between being mentally ill and psychotic. Psychotics literally lose all connection to reality and are in a whole different mental planet of their own, which has no connection to reality at all. Mental illness means that a person has episodes where their brain chemistry is in fact utterly off-kilter and it takes treatment to bring it back on track, but fundamentally the person is sane and can be helped to live a stable life. Now, William thinks that mentally ill people are crazy, which is not true; there's just an imbalance that has to be addressed and treated. Psychotics, yes, I would use the word crazy, but like I said, there's a difference that has to be accentuated in order for the stigma to be removed.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Whiffy Leaks on June 02, 2017, 11:57:13 pm
^^ it was the Silver mask he was wearing, not the Lone Ranger one. He left that in the dress up box with the medals.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 04, 2017, 03:36:18 am
I do think that how they're living is sick; both seem to be feeding each other's paranoia and fears and I think Kate is constantly afraid of nothing relevant and he strikes me as someone who is clearly not aware that he's not as much of a target as he likes to think.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: kolkomilko on June 05, 2017, 04:38:32 pm
^ I do agree. They deserve each other.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on June 07, 2017, 04:08:44 pm
Why  are Kate and William never at celebrations of the Scandinavian royals?

In recent years, the Scandinavian royal families have had a lot to celebrate – both weddings, childbirths and various anniversaries in Oslo, Stockholm and Copenhagen. Just last month, the Norwegian royal couple celebrated their 80th birthdays with a great party in the capital, and royals from Sweden, Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Monaco, Belgium, Spain, Greece and the United Kingdom were represented.
http://royalcentral.co.uk/uk/cambridges/why-are-kate-and-william-never-at-celebrations-of-the-scandinavian-royals-83318


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 07, 2017, 04:29:29 pm
they aren't wanted so they are not invited. WK have made it clear that they have no problems going on a lawsuit spree or basically causing trouble via a PR Smear campaign, so no one wants them around.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on June 07, 2017, 10:40:41 pm
And if they were invited the galumming galoot Willy Supreme Idiot would make asinine comments and Council Potato Head Cath wouldn't have a clue who anyone was.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on June 07, 2017, 11:19:02 pm
Sue-happy people are frowned upon. They may win the lawsuit or make a bunch of money, but people will look down on them for it. Nobody wants you at their event if they're afraid of a lawsuit getting in the news (bad publicity) because you're in a bad mood or didn't like a particular photo that was taken.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 07, 2017, 11:26:59 pm
Charles very publicly insulted the Scandinavian royals a long time ago and the BRF has made it clear that they're too good for the continental Europeans. Princess Michael is disdained, even though it's clear that at least Princess Michael actually appreciates what she has in life. The rest of them are quite frankly determined to be as uneducated as possible and meddle in people's lives and frankly I can see Kate trying to make a match for her dipwit brother.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Rosella on June 08, 2017, 12:24:19 am
Can I ask please when Charles very publicly insulted the Scandinavian monarchies a long time ago, and what it was that he did or said, as I seem to have missed that?

The Scandi monarchies have always maintained excellent links with the BRF, especially the Norwegians (King Harald, who was a godson of King George VI, regularly comes to stay at Sandringham with Queen Sonja) and Queen Daisy of Denmark has a warm friendship with Queen Elizabeth. The Wessexes are always present at Scandi celebrations of one kind or another, which would be very odd if the heir to the British throne had been so insulting.

Similarly, I don't know how the BRF acts too good for its continental cousins when it's known that the Queen and Princess Beatrix talk on the phone very regularly and Beatrix and daughter in law Mabel stayed at Windsor on a regular basis when Beatrix's son was lying in a coma longterm in a London hospital. Similarly Sofia of Spain and the Greeks are very close to the BRF and socialise with Charles.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on June 27, 2017, 06:16:38 pm
There are apparently reports in France & Germany that the Cambs took a quick holiday in France right about now..


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Rosella on June 28, 2017, 01:25:44 am
Perhaps this should be on Guess the Next Scandal, lol. However, this has appeared over the last few hours on Aussie news networks. It's been reported, via a leak, that Cameron and William were present at a meeting of FIFA (the international Soccer authority)  at which dodgy tactics were allegedly  attempted in order to secure the World Cup for England.

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/prince-william-and-david-cameron-caught-up-in-fifa-corruption-scandal-report-20170627-gwzyl8.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on June 28, 2017, 03:45:17 am
The telegraph has a write about this too

Wonder what they do to distract bring out the kids use the D card




The Duke of Cambridge and David Cameron have become embroiled in a row over corruption in football as the full extent of England’s failed attempt to stage the 2018 World Cup was made public.

The former prime minister and Prince William were at a meeting during which a vote-swapping deal between England and South Korea was discussed, according to an official report released Tuesday night.

The long-awaited Fifa report has disclosed the lengths to which England’s football bosses went to court Fifa executives, many of them now discredited, as they sought to secure votes for England's 2018 bid.

At one point officials discussed the possibility of arranging a meeting with the Queen for one Fifa representative whose vote could have helped England.

The Fifa report reveals how Mr Cameron asked the South Korean delegation to back England's bid, only to be told that England would have to agree to reciprocate by pledging support for South Korea's bid to host the 2022 tournament.

Such a vote-swapping deal, the report concluded, would have been in “violation of the anti-collusion rules”.

The report, written in 2014 by Fifa’s then chief ethics investigator Michael Garcia, details how England bid officials interacted with Fifa officials in the run up to the vote.

It discloses how they were asked to bestow an honorary knighthood and arrange an audience with the Queen for one South American official



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/27/prince-william-david-cameron-caught-fifa-corruption-scandal/


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 28, 2017, 10:09:22 am
http://www.celebitchy.com/540360/duchess_kate_is_allegedly_hiring_a_supernanny_to_deal_with_the_kids_tantrums/ Hiring a nanny, another nanny and I do think that this is another extravagance.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on June 28, 2017, 02:43:21 pm
Maybe if they had "parents" who actually cared about them, and were around often enough, then the tantrums would not take place.  As far as I am aware the only one with tantrums was sprog I, yet now they are making it sound like both.  If Nanny Maria and a houseful of staff cant control them then who can´.  Bill and cath medd should be ashamed of themselves, those kids are pure pr for them and in between time they are left to run riot.  Can´t believe Nanny Maria lets them run wild, must be two incredibly difficult sprogs.  Sprogs pick up on things, maybe the atmosphere and dynamics with the odious two adults rub off on the sprogs, often happens.  More taxpayer money being wasted, never ends does it.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: jackiew on June 28, 2017, 04:00:20 pm
I'm surprised because the kids seem well behaved and calm when they are with nanny Maria, the trouble seems to start when they are with Will, Kate and Ma. Perhaps instead of a new nanny Will, Kate and Ma should take parenting classes.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 29, 2017, 02:51:37 am
I think Kate has a rigid behavioral code that creates horrendous anxiety and I don't think the kids can really run around the nursery shrieking all the time about childish things and being kids. She treats them like little adults and they might be like Victorian kids living in terror of their parents.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on June 29, 2017, 12:49:00 pm
I think the real Kate comes out when she is alone - doubt she is Super Mommy taking them to the park or outings, they probably don't get seen too often outside palace doors. She probably lounges around a lot in her skinny jeans and pops a lot of pizzas in the oven and drinks a lot of wine. When she isn't out shopping or tending to Council Caro's latest directions. Oh, and the telly.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on June 29, 2017, 06:24:30 pm
^Let us not forget all those cigarettes she smokes, bet AH stinks to high heaven of cigarette smoke.  Yuck.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on June 29, 2017, 06:35:40 pm
Both Council Cath and The Viper smoke like chimneys. Gotta keep those skinny figures with those knife knees sharply protruding.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on June 30, 2017, 04:03:47 am
I think the real Kate comes out when she is alone - doubt she is Super Mommy taking them to the park or outings, they probably don't get seen too often outside palace doors. She probably lounges around a lot in her skinny jeans and pops a lot of pizzas in the oven and drinks a lot of wine. When she isn't out shopping or tending to Council Caro's latest directions. Oh, and the telly.

Adult coloring books, scheming against HM, scheming against Charles, moping about her lot in life, and evading engagements and abusing staff.

Those kids don't have a chance.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on June 30, 2017, 11:59:30 am
^ You are right. No way do they have a chance with all of that plus with the grasping Viper running the show.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 01, 2017, 08:34:18 am
WK are determined to be victims of everyone around them and that to me is chilling; they pull all this stuff and still insist on being victims.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on July 04, 2017, 01:34:27 pm
^That is because they are stupid beyond belief.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 05, 2017, 05:25:42 pm
I kind of see them dancing on a razor's edge; they've so little to stand on that if they end up going on way or another, they'll fall. Kind of like how Kate was on edge and clearly on such thin ice. She got the ring, is married, but she was losing ground with each year that came along.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on July 06, 2017, 10:14:14 pm
Just saw advertised by that awful sycophantic Ingrid Stewart the programme below on ITV3 Tuesday.

'Kate the making of the modern queen'.

Stewart always has the most dumb expression on her face.  She knows the truth about the Cambs too.  Anything to make a fast buck.

She was gushing away as to how cath has made the Monarchy popular - in her dreams!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 07, 2017, 12:23:31 am
Oh I am so watching this once it hits Youtube.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on July 07, 2017, 07:53:50 am
Me too !!! Wish I'd seen it. The thought of waity as Queen makes me shudder. She will turn the coronation into a tackfest and priobably want to "modernize" it... Party pieces could provide all sorts  for the occasion.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 07, 2017, 09:00:06 am
I get a bad feeling Kate wants to run things in her own right without William around. Anne Boleyn wanted to run things and hounded King Henry until he cut off her head. Kate reminds me of Anne, so much ambition and so much ruthlessness. William was (and likely is) besotted and also filled with irritation. He gives in, in order to shut her up, but at this juncture he is likely tired of her BS. No wonder everyone hated the Boleyns so much.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on July 07, 2017, 11:49:51 am
It may be her dreams but it's certainly our nightmares!!!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: LadyVi on July 08, 2017, 05:15:14 pm
I didn't know which thread to out this in:

‘The naughtiest mum’ Prince William and Harry speak about Diana as a mother for first time

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/826293/princess-diana-death-anniversary-prince-harry-prince-william-kate-middleton-meghan-markle


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 09, 2017, 06:21:10 pm
This isn't the first time they've talked about their mother.

Their most recent shtick is a decade too late.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on July 09, 2017, 08:02:39 pm
I'll post this here too (as well as in the TV off topic section) if that's okay!
I somehow doubt that Bill loves the show, but who knows!!

>> Prince William loves 'gypsy' Kate in Channel 4's The Windsors

PRINCE William is a huge fan of The Windsors and finds the portrayal of his wife Kate as a gypsy traveller “hilarious”, say friends.

The Duke of Cambridge “loves “watching the Channel 4 show, starring Harry Enfield as his father Prince Charles, which returned for a second series last Wednesday.

The parody, which has courted criticism for storylines such as the Duchess of Cambridge catching ebola and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie being radicalised, is a “must watch” at Kensington Palace.

A royal insider said: “The Duke finds The Windsors absolutely hilarious. He loves it. He finds the whole ‘Kate is a gypsy’ thing particularly funny. He watched the whole of the first series and will be tuned in for the second.”

The Windsors tells the story of the Royal Family reimagined through the lens of a soap opera.

Although the stories are completely fictional, they are inspired by real events.

Camilla, played by Haydn Gwynne, is depicted as a cartoon villain hellbent on becoming Queen, while Kate (Louise Ford) is portrayed as a gypsy traveller who doesn’t fit in.

Her sister Pippa, played by Morgana Robinson, is represented as a jealous attention seeker who sleeps with Prince Harry and tries to seduce William as well. <<

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/826315/Prince-William-Kate-Channel-4-The-Windsors-TV-Royal-Family


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on July 09, 2017, 10:03:06 pm
I reckon he might have seen a couple of episodes and sat there pulling the last bits of hair he has on his head out.  He is an arrogant prig, and I honestly cannot see him finding it funny, at all. All a send up and his arrogance would dislike that intensely.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 09, 2017, 10:12:00 pm
His liking this would be cute if he had something substantial to stand on. Instead of the television, he should be working at a JOB and trying to save what last shreds of credibility he has left.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Tatiana on July 09, 2017, 11:27:52 pm
I get a bad feeling Kate wants to run things in her own right without William around. Anne Boleyn wanted to run things and hounded King Henry until he cut off her head. Kate reminds me of Anne, so much ambition and so much ruthlessness. William was (and likely is) besotted and also filled with irritation. He gives in, in order to shut her up, but at this juncture he is likely tired of her BS. No wonder everyone hated the Boleyns so much.

  Anne Boleyn didn't hound Henry VIII until he cut off her head,  she lived in much different, dangerous times and is like chalk and cheese compared to Kate.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 10, 2017, 12:05:12 am
Anne Boleyn had enemies like Kate does now and I do think that she's unaware of just how close she is living with them; we live in dangerous times as well. William might for some reason still have love left for her, but if things get any harder in his life (like losing any more shreds of respect) he will drop her quick. I don't think he loves her, so much as he loves his golden life that ended for good the minute he ended up putting that ring on her finger. He destroyed his life and ever since, ti has been one downward spiral after another. If he had a chance at a golden life if it meant dropping Kate for good, he would do it. His 'love' for Kate is tied up in his success. When he announced his engagement he could avoid facing any negativity, but after the honeymoon it came to a point where he couldn't ignore the fact that no one was taking him seriously and since his inability to get involved in any serious talks, he's been getting more and more frustrated. His talks with the Chinese happened since he wants to be a player so badly and basically can't handle being ornamental. His writing letters to ministers is one sign and it's clear that he's blaming Kate for his utter ineptitude.

IF Kate were helping him get taken more seriously, he would in fact be a lot more loving towards Kate. He (and likely Harry) is the type of man who can love someone only insofar that they're getting what they want out of them. If he were as popular as JFK, he would have a lot of love for her.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on July 14, 2017, 06:17:32 pm
Apparently they were watching Williams Helicopter

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEstzVOVoAE03V3.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEstzlXUIAA5t3K.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEstz2EUQAE6aA6.jpg


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on July 16, 2017, 06:42:48 pm
More press comments

Rosie75, London, United Kingdom, 21 minutes ago
When they thought the cameras weren't on them the body language between Kate and William was awful. Looked miserable! He was leaning away from her and she had a face like thunder.
ReplyNew


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4700854/Stars-Wimbledon-Roger-Federer-v-Marin-Cilic.html#ixzz4n15vpTjo
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on July 16, 2017, 06:53:53 pm
^ Lies! Just look how loved up they are

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/16/15/4264F56500000578-4700854-image-a-209_1500215148005.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DE3MP5hXcAAry5r.jpg

Would he look as sour lovely as he does if it wasn't lurve?

(Here he's showing Kate the door and leaning as far as he can away from her
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/16/14/42649C1200000578-4700854-image-a-147_1500211895258.jpg)


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 16, 2017, 07:58:43 pm
He could have removed her from his life at any point; when it was clear she wasn't going to go quietly, he could have gotten a lawyer and basically ejected her out via stalking/harassment charges and I am certain that he would have won since HM is his grandmother. I am sure Kate would have been happier too once it was all over and there was nothing she could do (after a stint at the Priory). So he has no one to blame but himself for his misery. At some point he was going to have to deal with a persistent ex-flame and he should have just swallowed his childishness and taken adult action.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: logically on July 16, 2017, 08:27:27 pm
Just looking at some pictures in the DM article linked above.  If Prince Albert was there and Prince Michael of Kent, the mayor, Theresa May were there and never-mind the sports/Hollywood stars who did our illustrious couple interact with?? Perhaps it was the photos i have seen but it looks like the Cam's were not asked to represent their country and talk to anyone but themselves???


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on July 16, 2017, 08:45:10 pm
^ I too have read that they basically kept to themselves, even whilst being tenichally right next to impotant people (of higher rank too, like Albert Grimaldi). However, that's sadly nothing unusual. They are too arrogant, spoilt, entitled and dumb for their job. Just remember the fiasco when they were at that commemoration for WWII and ignored Felipe and had to ask who he was!!! And still not acknowledging him, until they got behind the scenes and then curtsied to him. Yeah, the Cambs, ambassadors of the worst form, any country's worst nightmare come true.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 17, 2017, 02:53:17 am
At the 2012 Olympics they didn't socialize at all and frankly I believe that they should be ashamed. All those interesting people who could be allies are being snubbed.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on July 17, 2017, 04:40:29 am
Imagine some poor soul having to talk to William and Kate.  It would go like this:

Kate:  I like the tennis.  George likes the tennis too.  He's at home making a big pancake mess.  Erm, tennis. *waves lobster claws*

William:  My mummy died, you know.  And George is a wuss because tennis is too physical for him.  That better not be a camera in your pocket.  Where are my lawyers?

Kate:  Pippa likes the tennis. *snorts*  So does Charlotte. Does this dress make me look fat? *guffaws*

William:  Are you invading my privacy like they did my Mummy?  I'm gonna sue you!  1.3 million pounds, pleb! I'll show you!

Carole:  How much did you say that was again, Will?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on July 17, 2017, 07:01:06 am
Another article extolling their virtues !! The Republican movement's greatest gift

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4701832/The-Middletons-no-different-Kardashians.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on July 17, 2017, 08:27:11 am
^

The Queen has certainly tarnished the Monarchy and hastened its demise by allowing that awful family to gain a hold.  More and more Press articles reflect this.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on July 17, 2017, 12:20:11 pm
Everybody loves a freebie! Prince William is seen enthusiastically rifling through a GOODY BAG in the Royal Box at Wimbledon

    William seen rifling through small leather pouch at men's singles final
    Some royal watchers thought he might have adopted a 'man bag'
    The Royal Spectator confirmed on Twitter that it was a goody bag
    All Royal Box ticket holder received leather branded pouch 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4703176/Prince-William-gets-excited-goody-bag-Wimbledon.html

The Cambs finally caught at what they do best: pocketing freebies.

The negative press certainly has been piling up in the past couple of months and no one has been spared: Chuck & Camz, Bill & Waity, Harry, the Yorks, the Meddledooms, the monarchy as a whole. hmmm....  :cookie:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on July 17, 2017, 12:29:27 pm
Look at Prince Petulance. Council Cath is cajoling him to make him come about but Willy Woo Woo is in such a bad mood. Poor little Willy Woo. He's dumber than a box of rocks. What an ineffectual weak leader he will be but then again remember that Council Cath and The Viper control him and will be pulling the strings.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 19, 2017, 03:17:00 am
Never thought this would be said about William, but he is a train-wreck waiting to happen. Neither are fun, spontaneous, or at all interesting, but self destructive and pulling the nation with them to the wall. I think once they hit the wall it'll be a relief mainly since neither are doing anything other than drawing out the pain and the self degradation. I know that we think Kate derailed William, but I do believe that William was never on much of a track; he might have had a shot before university to pull it together, but after he ended up really derailing. Unreal how he thought he had it made and in fact he ruined his life. I admit that once they hit the wall and can't get out of the mess they make, it'll be a relief for a lot of people who are forced to carry them.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on July 19, 2017, 03:32:52 am
A lot of that was probably being told growing up that he was to be king one day, and that he was special and could do no wrong.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 19, 2017, 05:59:00 am
He was also given too much leeway; the minute he graduated, he had no business shirking his duties. He should have been ordered to do duties and grant honors and basically stop mouthing off and get to work. No indulgences, no slacking, no PR BS, and the minute Kate started her campaign against the BRF, he should have been given a very public ultimatum. No 'true love thwarted by evil royals" BS, HM should have had Kate denounced and William should have been flogged for allowing that kind of treason. As for Harry, Harry should have been drilled all the harder. Giving the middle finger to tradition and possible alliances should have been put a stop to. If I had been in charge, I would have ordered that every single head of state possible be invited to that wedding and I would have refused to let WK live off base. If they wanted a non-base life, he could have dropped out of the military and basically worked in London. No posh vacations and no BS about having Kate decide anything until she earns the right to make choices.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: annecros on July 19, 2017, 01:06:20 pm
Good thing you are not in charge. Granted, I have said that about myself.  :bouncy:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 20, 2017, 06:50:26 pm
I think this marriage is loaded with cheating; Kate can't even be trusted around Ainslie and go figure she's all got up for any handsome athlete. As for William, he doesn't love Kate and I am certain that she's at a point where she can't cope with the ugly reality that her belief in being an eternal renewed virgin is over. I do wonder if whether or not she'll ever truly accept that she's tolerated, not accepted and they suffer her presence because of William's stupidity.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on July 29, 2017, 07:36:36 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4741394/PLATELL-S-PEOPLE-Time-William-sock-it.html

Everyone seems to want Billy to shut his pie hole.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: kolkomilko on July 29, 2017, 08:59:13 am
^ It looks like. More, please.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on July 29, 2017, 07:24:09 pm
People are tired about hearing how 'hard' their lives are, when many can barely afford to pay bills and put food on the table, sometimes working more than one job. And of course taxes and the cost of living keep increasing, so the standard of living is actually lower now for a lot of people compared to 10 years ago. PW/PH/KM put in at best a few hours a week and get a free ride.

Most people are also not interested in hearing about Diana anymore, especially as a sympathy card. I could understand talking about losing their mother to kids and young adults who recently lost a parent, relate to them and make sure they get the counseling and have the resources they need. But on a world stage, it seems a bit much to keep bringing up the past.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 29, 2017, 07:36:37 pm
Time have changed and it's clear that William hasn't wanted to change with it. If Diana had died in these times, these struggling times, the public would not have had such a huge outpouring of grief and frankly I am certain that a lot of people would have not felt as sorry for Diana since she clearly had it good herself materially. Few would care that she had been cheated on and few would have cared about hearing about Diana's latest interview blaming the BRF for everything. People have real problems NOW and people are not tolerant about hearing those well off make their miseries apparent to the world that has it so much harder. I do believe no one really wants to even care anymore; no one wants to hear about the latest drama involving the princes and no one WANTS to actually feel any sympathy to a trio of brats who are supposed to be leading things instead of mooching and demanding that the public care and support them.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: leogirl on July 29, 2017, 09:10:29 pm
^ They are grown adults in their 30's. They really should be setting a better example, not whining or complaining, to other Millennials and the generation coming up after them. Stop being so self-centered and see how they can help other people.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 29, 2017, 10:13:02 pm
You know, one day William and Kate and Harry are going to wake up and face the facts that they aren't young and they aren't hip. An entire generation has grown up since they were born and they're adults. Harry and William are balding, while Kate is prematurely aged after the life she's led; all three are out of shape, zero stature, and they very clearly are derailed and uninterested in doing appearances, which they treat as a joke. It's not like they even care about the public except as an audience that is supposed to be applauding their 'cool' lives and I do see now fully that each level marries its own. William wrecked the track that was laid out for him since birth in favor of freestyling his way through life and has been unable to find his footing, much less go in any direction. Kate keeps pushing herself all over the place, while blaming others for the messes she causes and Harry clearly isn't going to stabilize and become a decent worker, much less a leader.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Spotted Dick on July 30, 2017, 06:45:05 am
^They will always be waiting to happen.  They don't realize there's no there there.  Never will be.  Partially because the empty vessel that is Waity is solely defined by her association with Horsey Head, her empty title and the associated trappings.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on July 30, 2017, 05:41:25 pm
I can't get over how William threw his life away; Kate was on a track to nowhere in life and he let himself get sidetracked and then derailed. He could have gone about his appearances, could have easily acquired massive experience via the Prince's Trust, and then launched into statesmanship via duties at embassies around the world and with the right additional education, he could have been at the near pinnacle of world status. Just having Charles and HM above him, he could have built something of himself that spanned the globe and given the public something massive to look forward to. Instead the dolt didn't grow up and take responsibility and now look at him.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on July 30, 2017, 07:03:50 pm
Now, look at him is right. He is a gormless galoot that makes stupid, uneducated statements who just wants the good life. He is lazy and a complete liar.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Spotted Dick on July 31, 2017, 05:35:51 am
^^That would have required a certain strength of character that he clearly lacks.  The non-existent parental guidance didn't help, either.

^Galoot -- Ha ha, I love it!  What a great word.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on July 31, 2017, 08:08:31 am
There are a lot of people out there who have lost either one parent, or both.  Some have gone into foster care, others maybe grandma or auntie/uncle have raised them.  They have worked hard, maybe against all the odds, and made something of themselves, in whatever small way.  IMO, parents or not, your strength of character will come to the fore and you will move forward.  Bill medd is a nothing in my view.  He has the most luxurious life, at no cost to himself, or had to work for it  -  all comes from the taxpayer.  And look at him, he wants to do nothing in return, palms off the medds and they get a lot of perks, financially, by being related to him.  The Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster are taxpayer funded, whichever way you look it all leads back to the taxpayer.  And there he is bleating all over the place, woe is me, my mother died in an accident, and I was only 15.  If I get something wrong, or do something wrong, I know you will forgive me because my mother is dead.  Jeez, the little horror needs to grow up and sort himself out.  We are 20 years down the line and he, plus haza, still want to ride Diana´s coat tails.  Between them and council cath, who thinks she got a wedding ring and then could just sit back and do nothing for her luxury life style, there is barely a brain cell between the three.  It is all me, me, me, and me again andagain.  What can I grab from the taxpayer this year.  I know, a hedge for a bit of privacy at KP, only 20k, pocket money, the taxpayer can fund that.  People have lived at KP for many, many years, nobody has ever complained about lack of privacy.  Anmer Hall, they want every moved around because they want a tennis court - 60k. Taxapayers can pick up the bill.  That is the tip of the iceberg, all they do is want, want, want.  Look at that gorgeous 38k kitchen ripped out at AH, council cath did not like it.  Ah, diddums, poor little soul.   Was she  paying for it , nope, otherwise it would have stayed there.  There were photos of it, a beautiful, big kitchen.  Not good enough for her ladyship.  But don´t expect me to work for it.  I am afraid any chance of them being popular has been blown out of the water by their own selfish, idle, greedy, grabbing behaviour.  Private jets to here, helicopters to there.  Public travel too much for them, they think they are above it all.  If they think the public will continue with all this, in this day and age, they need to think again.  The article about the queen a week or two ago was pretty scathing with the comments as well.  The public are sick to death of them.  Got a problem, pull out a Diana coat tail.  Want a hedge, good ole taxpayer can dip in their pockets a bit deeper.  They are not nice people, they haven´t got a clue.  They want the days of yore  -  get everything and make the odd appearce for a few minuts, give a wave, ta very much and off we go for another several months.  Times have changed, but they have not changed with them.  They are way past the time of growing up, they will be throwing the Diana card until the day they die, a disgusting bone idle unintelligent pair, with council cath riding the gravy train with them. They need outed, and fast,   The sooner the better IMO.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sanka on July 31, 2017, 09:20:59 am
Well said gingerboy24

Pulling out the 'poor me' and 'my mother was Diana and she died' with these 2 wore thin many years ago. Many other people face extreme suffering and yet they continue on and don't rely on the public for sympathy.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on July 31, 2017, 11:29:00 am
^And to have the audacity to think that people's views of Diana haven't changed over the last two decades. Those who are 20 years and younger probably don't know even who she was. They can't keep on being the sad 12 and 15 year olds who had to walk behind Mummy's coffin, because OUTRAGE.
What really ticked me off was the , "We won't be doing this again" statement, as if they were doing the public a huge favor.  Oh, shut up, you two.

Something big is brewing behind the scenes within the Windsor household, and I think Billy and Hooray Harry are NOT going to be happy campers with the outcome.
Whatever it is, it should have been done years ago.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on July 31, 2017, 12:30:38 pm
^ Let it be done and be done quickly.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Spotted Dick on July 31, 2017, 12:37:53 pm
^^^^They spend like drunken sailors.  I never understood why she needed two kitchens to heat up a frozen pizza.

^^@Sheridan, one can only hope.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on August 01, 2017, 02:14:38 am
I do think that the one thing I find ironical is how the two were supposedly going to put together this glamorous 'court' and fill it with the best, but go figure, the only types willing to toady to them is the Beckhams and the mess that is the lowest tabloid writers. Tina Brown would die to be able to dine at KP and so far no one decent wants to be around them. There won't be a 'court' since Charles has put an end to their former control and now it's just another round of hype failing to come through.

Clearly they disappointed the public and the press now has more interesting things to cover.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on August 04, 2017, 11:21:39 pm
Are the Princes' emotional outbursts linked to the surprise departure of two of the Queen's top aides?

    Christopher Geidt, the Queen’s private secretary, stepped down after 10 years
    He has been followed by her assistant private secretary, Samantha Cohen
    Royal watchers claim these events rooted in divisions between three households


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4762292/Are-Princes-outbursts-exit-Queen-s-aides.html

Haven't read the article (yet). It is a possibility. I'm glad the press is angling at what's going on behind the scenes. We have all said that W&H seem to fight back (and defend their mother), that sth/ a war is going on and now much of the staff is leaving or being moved to other positions.
Doubt it's to do with Liz's "two top aides", but I do think the speculation is going in the right direction.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on August 18, 2017, 05:17:15 pm
Duke Skywalker! Star Wars actor John Boyega confirms William and Harry DID film cameo roles as Stormtroopers for the upcoming film (but has their scene been cut?)

    Princes were filmed for cameo role as stormtroopers in Star Wars: The Last Jedi
    Revelation was made by actor John Boyega who said Tom Hardy was on set, too
    Fans might never see the royals on the big screen because 'scene was scrapped'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4802774/John-Boyega-confirms-William-Harry-DID-film-cameo.html


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on August 18, 2017, 06:10:52 pm
Harry and William can do everything but their jobs; comments are scathing as always.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sandy on August 18, 2017, 06:30:17 pm
Too 'precious' for years. Having fun and acting like professional celebrities.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on August 18, 2017, 09:19:27 pm
I cannot imagine just how insane this is making people; these three dolts (and Kate wasn't born into this lifestyle which gives her less excuse) have no reason to basically be this immature. Neither are needed in this production and someone else could use that credit; second, they are ignoring a nation of people who adore them, but it's turning into hatred at a very rapid rate. This is why no one decent wants them, they are essentially determined to be man-boys.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on August 30, 2017, 10:25:44 am
Wills rolls his sleeves up: Prince becomes full-time working royal as George, four, starts school in London

    Duke and Duchess of Cambridge will become full-time working royals next week
    William and Kate have now moved back to Kensington Palace in London
    They will steadily increase the number of duties they undertake on behalf of the Queen
    The duke and duchess  have been accused of failing to pull their weight


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4835038/Prince-William-Kate-time-working-royals.html

Just like Kate was so keen to hit the ground running .. never?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on August 30, 2017, 12:04:09 pm
Kate DOES hit the ground running, then trips and becomes a speed bump. :laugh:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sandy on August 30, 2017, 06:08:48 pm
I cannot imagine just how insane this is making people; these three dolts (and Kate wasn't born into this lifestyle which gives her less excuse) have no reason to basically be this immature. Neither are needed in this production and someone else could use that credit; second, they are ignoring a nation of people who adore them, but it's turning into hatred at a very rapid rate. This is why no one decent wants them, they are essentially determined to be man-boys.

I find it annoying that in the comments section some enthuse how the Queen wanted to give them a "normal" family life so she postponed full time duties for them. The Queen gets blamed for their idleness


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on August 30, 2017, 06:26:48 pm
You know, using HM like this is treason and any Arab King would have 'fixed' them mighty quick.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: LadyLaura on August 30, 2017, 06:55:04 pm
When HM goes they are really going to get it socked to them  :bat:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on August 30, 2017, 07:45:58 pm
I cannot get over what they've done to themselves and their people; had the world in the palm of their hand and then demanded more. Kate has less excuse since she wasn't born to any of this and shouldn't be half the waste she has proven herself to be.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on August 30, 2017, 09:05:50 pm
Kate DOES hit the ground running, then trips and becomes a speed bump. :laugh:

 :P :P :P


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on August 31, 2017, 01:46:25 pm
To Tesco Customer Service: my cart went over something hard in the parking lot. Please have one of your staff look into it. Best regards.  :sly:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: windsor2 on August 31, 2017, 01:51:40 pm
^ :tehe:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on September 01, 2017, 12:33:24 pm
The buzzards are swirling around, wondering what's up.  :James:

Sorry, off topic. Back to being on topic - Wonder what Billy is going to do 1 day after Diana-palooza? I shouldn't be so cynical but believe they (he and Henry Milquetoast) were part and parcel of it all. Funny if they were angry at the press this time?  :cookie:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on September 08, 2017, 11:03:38 pm
I think we can safely say that all three are complete inconstant hypocrites. I don't believe that any of them will ever really give any consistent anything to the press and at some point I am certain that the press will just give up and stop covering them. Too little value and too much hassle.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on September 08, 2017, 11:49:25 pm
^I dunno.  They are truly dead space for the media.  On that I agree.  But, consecutively, the press never sleeps and are always on the hunt for a chink in their armor or, more directly, an opportunity for sensationalism aka revenge.

PW really sunk himself way back with his open hostility to the press vs his privacy vs his fundamental responsibility to the tax payer.  So, any articles about them that he may want to get good coverage gets more of a dutiful bland coverage.

I was slightly surprised, for instance, how quickly the baby announcement fell off the media radar.  It was a non-story.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on September 09, 2017, 03:15:28 am
Right now there is so much more out there going on and it's not like the BRF has done anything to celebrate. This isn't the Eighties anymore and it's not at all worth covering. Kate and William clearly show their anger and *despise* of the press and frankly I am sure the press is tired of the abuse. As for Harry, he's pushing them around and I don't think that the engagement will be covered with as much zest as it might have otherwise been if Harry weren't playing his tiresome games. I am certain that there will be huge press, if only for the sake of the movies and documentaries and the endless nonstop coverage in the US. The difference is, no one is under any illusions about these people and clearly there won't be much fundamental excitement or rejoicing.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on September 09, 2017, 08:31:28 am
Must confess I was surprised about the lack of media interest in the sprog 3 announcement. That evening I expected the news channels in UK to be full of it, but all it got was a short mention at the end. Wonder if the were under orders from BP to keep it very low key.  If I recall, the announcement of sprog 2 on the way got a wall of silence from the rf itself, but this time maybe they have ordered no media kerfuffle. Who knows, but certainly find it a little bit odd.  Went down like a damp squib really.  If councils cath and caro were hoping for a shed load of pr on this one then they were way off mark, it has gone down like a lead balloon, especially with the government announcing earlier in the year that there would be benefits for families capped at two sprogs.  Previously they paid benefits for every child I believe.  And yet her is the vile duo, taxpayer funded, announcing a third sprog.  Has not gone down well in the UK at all.  If they were using their own money, working for it and doing something sensible for the country, then fine, but depriving the taxpayer of benefits for a third sprog, and those same taxpayers money being used to fund a third for these two vile lazy good for nothings, sticks in the throats of many.  A lot of complaints and hoo ha about it.  It has alienated many people  -  and rightly so IMO.  Big fail for them, nobody that interested, only the old sugars who dribble over anything anyone in the rf does.  Only have to blow their nose and the old sugars think it is wonderful, that is how sad they can be at times.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: india on September 09, 2017, 12:43:53 pm
You know it is really pathetic how the sugars just go on and on about the RF. What a bunch of mor*ns they are. Can't they see the truth about these awful, lying, grasping, sneaky unattractive people? I am sure the RF laughs at them as they go on their merry way lazing about and enjoying the vast wealth that they have available. Hideous people.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on September 09, 2017, 09:05:49 pm

^

Precisely.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sandy on September 09, 2017, 09:15:30 pm
Kate and William seem to think everybody would be thrilled at a third child. I think they may believe the hype in the media and magazines like People that people are all excited and happy over it.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Lindsay on September 10, 2017, 05:57:55 pm
I don't know why they would expect that Charlotte had minimal fanfare and this is just a joke the first time she is supposed to be a full time working royal she gets pregnant and "HG" that will postpone everything another two years. I guess narcissistic people aren't known for their logic.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on September 12, 2017, 06:06:04 am
I can't get over what both have become; neither really get it that their time has passed and her being pregnant is an excuse not to work. I'm shocked at the class conscious comments in the comment sections and I am surprised that the press has written various articles about deprived kids. I do believe that IF the UK weren't paying for that lifestyle through their taxes, that there might be more enthusiasm, but regrettably UK taxpayers are paying for a way of life neither they nor their children will be able to enjoy. UK taxpayers don't get time off to take care of a difficult pregnancy, or send their kids to exciting schools where the best teachers are. It's not like their kids get nice tailored clothes or designer shoes or anything special. If WK were out hustling to bring in job contracts and helping businesses get off the ground, I am certain it would be different, but neither are and neither get it that this is their job and they are supposed to be taking care of the people, not being taken care of BY the people. They aren't being paid to lark about and party.

As for Kate, I think she's going to just give up and not go out in public after the birth. I don't believe that she's going to come out and do her job and I'm disgusted at how completely useless she is towards her husband and nation. I can't get over how pointless her place in the BRF is. Pointless in school, pointless in her twenties, and pointless in her role of consort. She isn't much of a wife or mother, so no point to her being there either. As for William, his posturing and making up hype has become tiresome to many. It's a shame he threw his life away on that woman and on partying. No one is interested in his normalcy BS anymore either. He's not paid to be normal.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on September 12, 2017, 09:29:51 am
^Excellent, well said  :goodpost:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: kolkomilko on September 12, 2017, 10:28:31 am
^^  :thumbsup:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Lindsay on September 13, 2017, 06:24:44 pm
I do wonder which drive is stronger because we know Kate is competitive and we know she is lazy. If Meghan joins I wonder if her competitive streak kicks in or if she throws in the towel.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on September 13, 2017, 09:25:12 pm
I would say the competitive streak is stronger where MM or any woman is concerned.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on September 14, 2017, 04:52:31 pm
I do wonder which drive is stronger because we know Kate is competitive and we know she is lazy. If Meghan joins I wonder if her competitive streak kicks in or if she throws in the towel.

It won't matter; Kate has no credibility and if she starts up trouble with Meg in regards to competing, it'll only make the BRF resent Kate all the more. If Kate starts competing, clearly it'll just irritate people since it'll show that all she wants is to make trouble, not a life of her own.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Lindsay on September 14, 2017, 05:34:05 pm
I think it's in her nature to cause drama and Meghan would provide ample opportunity and provocations. She probably already has a better relationship with Charles than Kate's strained one.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Kuei Fei on September 16, 2017, 06:40:39 am
Quote
You know, I don't get her at all; she clearly isn't fitting in (and was never welcomed) and yet she isn't' even willing to build anything to stand on. She never tries with the BRF and she never really wants to try with the public and she clearly never really loved William and she never wants to just go where William went. At this point I truly do not get why she tried for that ring, thinking that she would be able to retreat into a more staid life and fancied that she would be queen bee; it's no wonder William looks so fed up with her and that the rest of the aristocrats don't like her. She can't just fall into line and just go about the business of being a royal duchess, she clearly wants to be among her own kind and she is out of her element with the aristocracy. She's making a huge inconvenience with everyone by insisting on having her son go through traffic instead of just to a nearby close school.

Quote
The logistics of getting him through traffic is just a security nightmare and will be tense for security officers on a daily basis. I am certain that at some point something might happen and then what? Security officers will be blamed, but clearly she and William should be sending their kids to a closer place, not across town, putting everyone out of their way.
   Report to moderator   69.244.160.108
To receive regular news, go to "@gossippsychotic" to get updates from various other gossip websites such as "Downtown Chatter" or "Royal Gossip Psychotic" and end up reading all about all sorts of peccadilloes.
   
Quote
Re: Kate expecting third child ~ (Read post #1 before posting)
« Reply #83 on: September 10, 2017, 08:53:12 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
^ Good question. What was the point? She doesn't want the platform she has, she doesn't want to help people less fortunate than her, she doesn't want to be a great representative of her country or at least won't put any effort in to any of it. Building relationships isn't a priority (especially if she isn't the alpha like with the BRF and aristos who all know what she did to get the Ring of Doom) which is why this big fish in a small pond school is a good fit and comfortable  for her.

Quote
She focused on the wrong things, IMHO. Pleasing her grasping family, proving her detractors wrong, getting caught in a cycle of causing drama and being "rescued" by William, loving the press attention, being treated as a celebrity, the free things and other perks, not having to work at anything or for anything, playing a role for William for so long she lost her own actual identity. Now she is stuck and still wants to not work, enjoy the attention (secretly, can't let William know), enjoy the perks, and lord her status over anyone she can easily impress and ignore her detractors and people that intimidate her.

These are quotes from the third child thread.

Given that there was a break in by a deranged fan, I am certain that this should be a wake up call to the couple that they need to stop expecting the world to just get out of their way and adjust to THEIR timetable. I do find it interesting how there has now been an open article mentioning dissension and I think this is only the beginning. Ever since the wedding, but more recently, all their grand plans have gone up in their faces. No fashion shows, no invites to make speeches at the UN, and it does give a grim satisfaction that these spoiled brats have lost out on their grand plan for themselves of global domination. Nothing for them from the wider world.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on September 26, 2017, 10:49:02 pm
Some good ones here
http://www.tatler.com/gallery/animals-that-look-like-royals?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral

 :akasha:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sandy on September 27, 2017, 12:17:07 pm
The Koala is a whole lot better looking than Charles. Charles appears to have been advised to adopt the goofy gurning.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: LadyLaura on September 27, 2017, 05:58:31 pm
all of those animals are cuter than their human counterparts  :flirt:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on September 27, 2017, 06:41:09 pm
^ My thoughts exactly  :laugh:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on October 17, 2017, 11:27:38 am
Kensington Palace
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge will undertake an official visit to Norway and Sweden at the request of the FCO in early 2018.




Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on October 17, 2017, 12:26:32 pm
In other words, it's been postponed from Nov to early next year?
Somehow, with the postponing and pregnancy and regal Victoria and well turnt out Daniel, I can't see Kate going at all tbh. The reason given will be pretend HG..  :sigh:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on October 18, 2017, 03:31:22 pm
What a surprise! Recovering Duchess makes an unannounced appearance with William and Harry at an event for young sports coaches in London

    Duchess of Cambridge stepped out for the second time in a week
    Joined William and Harry to meet young sports coaches in London
    Came just days after she danced with Paddington Bear
    Royal sources say she's feeling better and taking things 'day by day'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4993200/Duchess-Cambridge-joins-William-Harry.html

Not sure whether it's necessary to create a new thread for this and what to call it, so here it is (for now?)!
Feel free to move as seen necessary!

Wow OMG she "stepped out for the second time in a week"!!!! World record or what!?

What is up with these "surprise" appearances? Likely to keep the "poor poor me, I have HG for the third time!" charade going.  :wopedo:

PS How brave and inspirational is she? I'm awe struck! And she got even a new blazer that looks exactly like a coat she already has! No end to the strengths & talents of her!

PPS Seems the event is called "coach core"?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on October 18, 2017, 03:42:36 pm
^ What is she doing with her hands, peeling an egg?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on October 18, 2017, 04:01:36 pm
^ I often wonder wtf she does with her hands..

The jeggings are also back, thank goodness  :wopedo:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/18/15/45755A6400000578-4993200-image-a-2_1508337981676.jpg

I notice they are publishing much more flattering pics of her today than yesterday. I guess the dm got an earful?  :spy:

She also owns this very coat in red, as well as several other coats of other brands that look the same as this one (hue and cut)
(Philosophy Di Lorenzo Serafini blazer for £760)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/10/18/14/4575234F00000578-4993200-Kate_looked_glowing_and_is_said_to_be_recovering_well_from_her_b-a-18_1508334799195.jpg

http://brightcove04.o.brightcove.com/4221396001/4221396001_5322996295001_5322826867001-vs.jpg?pubId=4221396001&videoId=5322826867001

She basically wore the same when wearing the red coat, except the shoes.

What a style inspiration/ icon :yeahright: :eightball:

PS I guess she's also hauling her a*se out of bed to enjoy her possibly last months as sole "young duchess" and the threesome before someone possibly joins The Firm and she has another female being a direct threat to her. Possibly also trying to polish the image somewhat before the rival takes up space and threatens to kick her further down the popularity meter?


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on October 18, 2017, 05:41:40 pm
^Can she go any further down ?!!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on October 18, 2017, 05:50:15 pm
Looks more and more manly every time I see her


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on October 18, 2017, 05:53:06 pm
^^ The jeggings are back?!  I had hope but alas... :NOwhy:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on October 18, 2017, 07:43:21 pm
The spray-on jeggings were out in their full glory

https://s1.postimg.org/48z94axw9b/IMG_6445.jpg

https://postimg.org/image/5qi5k7olob/

 :ick: :thumbsdown:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on October 19, 2017, 04:29:30 am
I wish somebody would burn those freaking things!!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Sheridan_is_appalled on October 19, 2017, 04:59:53 am
^She'll just go to Ma's and get another ratty pair.  I think they bought up all the ratchet jeggings they could get their hands on.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on October 19, 2017, 06:37:44 pm
Lots of adverse comments on those hideous crotch clasping jeggins from DM commenters.
Insiders say the DM break their own rules by allowing posters to have multiple aliases
probably because they are Mids

From another forum

'Jess, Hayle, is another Cambridge fan who is always rude to those who disagree with her.  I see that James Allenby has yet another version of that name.  Why is he allowed to have so many aliases?  Is is because he's James Middleton...'



Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: marion on October 19, 2017, 10:18:50 pm
Letters of complaint have been sent to DM but they just make excuses and say they're not aware of any rule- breaking, even when they are given evidence


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Val on October 19, 2017, 10:39:28 pm
^

They are frequently reported to IPSO who should be investigating further re above plus their blatant withholding of comments to distort true opinions.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: sandy on October 19, 2017, 11:48:12 pm
Lots of adverse comments on those hideous crotch clasping jeggins from DM commenters.
Insiders say the DM break their own rules by allowing posters to have multiple aliases
probably because they are Mids

From another forum

'Jess, Hayle, is another Cambridge fan who is always rude to those who disagree with her.  I see that James Allenby has yet another version of that name.  Why is he allowed to have so many aliases?  Is is because he's James Middleton...'



James A. is an ardent royalist as are Eddy and bingofan.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Little light on October 20, 2017, 12:09:49 am
What a depressing, futile way for a grown man to fill his days. Writing sycophantic tripe about the Medds.

Isn't he supposed to be a successful businessman? If so, he should have his head stuck in work mode, not thinking up aliass to try and bolster his sister's plummeting image. A more effective way of using that time and energy would be thinking up ways for his failing businesses to make money.  :work:

And I did try and find a gif for JM, but couldn't find any with a dead squirrel or a marshmallow face. So just pretend I have that gif at the end of this post.   :thankyou:

And yes, I'm off topic here MODs. But this reply wouldn't work in JM's thread, I don't think.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on October 20, 2017, 12:26:50 am
^Fyi, this is our James smiley:   :James:

Just a little comedy relief.  Seems like we could all use it.   :flower:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Snowpea on October 20, 2017, 03:50:25 am
 :James:

I love this one - it's pretty versatile.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Little light on October 20, 2017, 01:17:31 pm
I didn’t know that. Sorry.

It making me  :laugh:


Thanks YM


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: YooperModerator on October 20, 2017, 04:43:37 pm
If it made you or anyone smile or laugh, you've made my day!   :hi:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on November 06, 2017, 10:39:34 pm
Prince William, Kate and children spotted at Chester Railway Station

http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/prince-william-kate-children-spotted-13867155


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on November 07, 2017, 12:47:39 am
^ Like it says in the article I think they were there for the Grosvenors's bonfire night thingy at Eaton Hall.
Missed their train.. How unorganized are they.. had to get "an empty train to Crewe", does that mean missed the intended deliberately and then sponged another train to have for themselves? Maybe my imagination went a bit wild with this, but kind of reads like that.


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: Fly on the wall on November 07, 2017, 01:22:45 am
won't be surprise if they really did miss the train on purpose


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: BostonLibby on November 07, 2017, 08:20:09 pm
^^ I read it the same way you did HRHOlya.  My first thought was that they did it on purpose to get an empty train to themselves. :sigh:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on November 07, 2017, 10:10:34 pm
I'm glad I'm not the only one!


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: CathyJane on November 08, 2017, 02:58:10 am
No I thought the same thing. Great minds think alike!  :thumbsup:


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: gingerboy24 on November 14, 2017, 09:06:39 pm
Love this piece from LolaLoveHeart   - comical but oh so true

♕ KATE MIDDLETON & BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
THE RMS WINDSOR
NOVEMBER 9, 2017 117 COMMENTS
The ocean liner The Titanic was thought to be unsinkable, until of course it sank, the iceberg it hit compromising five of its sixteen watertight compartments, one more than the ship could withstand.

The British Monarchy may no longer be viewed as unsinkable, but it survived the annus horribilis, Diana’s death and Hurricane Fergie, albeit with damage to the hull, so what exactly did it hit for it to be taking on so much water recently?  Or did someone release the Kraken?  I hope not, I love a good Kraken release party.

Currently Compromised Compartments:


http://lovelolaheart.com/

Another one too

♕ KATE MIDDLETON & BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY
DANCING QUEEN JOINS PRINCES TO MEET PADDINGTON BEAR
OCTOBER 17, 2017 LOVELOLAHEART   115 COMMENTS

There are a couple of possible explanations for Kate going from bed ridden in the care of doctors at Kensington Palace to Dancing Queen.  The first is that Kate probably just had regular morning sickness but the Palace Press Office declared it Hyperemesis Gravidarum to make Kate sound like a brave little trooper to give the rather dull duchess something that seems like a personality trait. The second far more credible-sounding excuse is that Carole Middleton has Kate locked in a dungeon somewhere and has assumed her identity because what woman in her thirties would look this frumpy on purpose?


http://lovelolaheart.com/?p=4195


Title: Re: Dukes of Cambridge: Press Articles & Random Chat 2017
Post by: HRHOlya on November 17, 2017, 11:45:11 pm
Royal play date! Roger Federer and his two sets of twins drop in on the Cambridges at Kensington Palace ahead of tennis ace's clash with Wimbledon rival Marin Cilic

    Roger Federer, 36, and his family are in London this week for the ATP finals
    The Swiss tennis champ dropped in on the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
    Roger, his wife and children staying in a hotel near Kensington Palace
    Cambridges are close friends with Federers and invited them to their wedding
    Federer secured a three-set win against Croatian Marin Čilić the following day


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5093161/Roger-Federer-family-visit-Kensington-Palace.html